Philip Larkin ‘s ‘High Windows ‘ written in 1967 was seen really much as a dialectic between the Yeatsian and Hardy-esque elements of his poesy, traveling from the banal to the transcendent. The subjects in ‘High Windows ‘ that are identified from this contradictory argument are that of young person, old age, sex and faith. Larkin adopts an eclectic scope of techniques to picture these subjects and by making so enacts the mismatch between human life and the existence it inhabits.

‘High Windowss ‘ is centralised around the sexual freedom portrayed by the younger coevals and the sorrow of Larkin ‘s ain deficiency of chance in his younger old ages as he is now excessively old to take portion in this new permissive society. High Windowss ‘ is a reaction from an older coevals to a sexually liberated young person. In the first stanza Larkin employs a calculated commonplace tone: ‘And conjecture he ‘s sleep togethering her and she’s/Taking pills ‘ . The usage of conversational enunciation creates an crude and awkward tone. Although Members of Larkin ‘s coevals may hold been shocked by its usage, such words were more acceptable in the universe of this new broad society. This is further emphasised by the rough usage of vowel rhyme and initial rhyme, ‘a twosome of childs ‘ which demonstrates the withdrawal between the older and younger coevalss. The usage of the phrase ‘fucking her ‘ is Demotic and street-wise, this shows this new coevals ‘s reductive position of love by oversimplifying the complex ideal of love and disregarding its nuances. Larkin has created an equivocal character who is evidently angry and bitterly disappointed at the young person of today because they have been granted ‘paradise ‘ by the betterments in contraceptive method: ‘she ‘s /Taking pills or have oning a stop ‘ . Larkin mocks this new young person with the usage of practical enunciation such as ‘diaphragm ‘ and ‘pills ‘ as these are comparatively new words that have entered the vocabulary of this new laissez- faire society. This is a really harsh and farinaceous description of a lifestyle unfamiliar to the talker. Larkin was likely unaccustomed to their usage and jealous of the sexual revolution that now existed. This is dry, in that, the linguistic communication moves from the provocative slang to a rarefied poetic one, ‘fucking ‘ and ‘paradise ‘ are non precisely synonymous. This conversational articulation can besides be found in the gap line of: ‘This Be The Verse ‘ ‘They screw you up, your Dendranthema grandifloruom and pa. ‘ By taking on the slang used by a younger coevals, Larkin links the two coevalss together to give significance to their emancipation. The usage of this expletive linguistic communication serves to demo how Larkin perceives the relationships of this new coevals and the promiscuousness that now pervades. Larkin uses the technique of enjambement to allow his train of idea addition impulse through the lines and stanzas to allow the signifier of the verse form uncover the edifice up of anxiousness in the talker ‘s voice.

The moral force of ‘High Windows ‘ from the first stanza to the 2nd becomes much more symbolic. Larkin ‘s plaint is shown in depicting his coevals as being ‘like an out-of-date combine reaper ‘ . Larkin compares the out-of-date traditions, emotional ‘bonds ‘ and old fashioned ‘gestures ‘ to a monolithic, disused piece of farm machinery. This uneven rural simile is somewhat absurd and suggests that each consecutive coevals is treated better than the predating one and that there is a certain inharmoniousness between the two. In ‘To the Sea ‘ Larkin besides uses the simile of ‘the corroding soup-tins ‘ to picture an image of the aged at the beach via the image of disintegrating and creaky objects to stand for the ripening procedure.

In contrast to the ageing procedure Larkin continues with a young person subject with ‘and everyone immature traveling down the long slide/To felicity, infinitely. ‘ gives an ambivalent image which heightens the sarcasm of strife between the immature and the old. Not merely is it a enjoyable journey for the younger coevals, it is apparently “ eternal ” and without effect. The slightly phallic mention to the ‘slide ‘ and the word ‘long ‘ has a sexual intension which conjures up an image of incursion. On the other manus it could be interpreted as the artlessness of the resort area being diminished by the moral diminution of present twenty-four hours young person once more demoing the disagreement between the two coevalss.

‘High Windows ‘ besides trades with the issue of faith. Larkin adopts a instead misanthropic and heartsick position of faith and that it no longer has a topographic point in modern society. The idiom ‘bonds and gestures ‘ has intensions of believing faith was simply meant as a show and was something that people were really pessimistic about, it represents committedness and fondness that is no longer recognised into today ‘s young person. We besides find this position portrayed in ‘The Building ‘ , with the reference of ‘a locked church ‘ and the comparing between patients of the infirmary and an ‘unseen fold ‘ this conjures up the image of a barrier to prayer thereby cursing them. ‘Vers de Societe ‘ uses the line ‘Playing at goodness, like traveling to church? ‘ This clearly hints that faith is a shallow waste of clip and is something to ‘play at ‘ without being serious.

In the 3rd stanza Larkin changes the position of the verse form through the usage of italics ; he adopts a 2nd character who is both covetous and sullen. The linguistic communication is non ever vulgar but sometimes leans towards the more colloquial and conversational to ironically denote the deficiency of echt feeling. Despite Larkin ‘s dissatisfaction with what has been endorsed in his epoch, he looks at how life has treated those who were old when he was immature: ‘I admiration if / Anyone looked at me, forty old ages back ‘ . Larkin seems to experience that life dainties each consecutive coevals better than the one before but that this advancement is non easy seen at the clip. ‘That ‘ll be the life ; /No God any more, or sudating in the dark / About snake pit and that ‘ , this look while unsophisticated, seems to take in, non merely the captivation but besides the disdain of faith. It captures each coevals ‘s longing for something better that can do them experience more fulfilled. It suggests that faith was something that older coevalss were forced to believe about when they did n’t desire to and that they envied the freedom of the young person of the twenty-four hours from spiritual or sexual guilt and fright of damnation.

Larkin ‘s coevals got rid of the impression of Eden and snake pit and godlessness was acceptable. They experienced a kind of religious emancipation that purportedly followed their rejection of traditional Christianity. They did n’t hold to worry about wickednesss made against God ‘or holding to hide/What you think of the priest ‘ . Larkin speculates whether or non his seniors were covetous of his spiritual freedom as he is of this younger coevals that is now one of irreligious and vicarious sexual autonomy. There is a sense of the cyclic nature of life as Larkin besides indirectly refers to the fact that person older than the storyteller likely watched him when he was immature and that now the older coevals expression yearningly on the younger coevals ‘s newborn chances. This allows Larkin the opportunity to demo the polar attitudes that prevailed during each of the coevalss that he refers to.

In the last two lines of the 4th stanza Larkin returns to the ‘down the long slide ‘ image mentioned earlier. He is still conceive ofing what the older coevals might hold said about him forty old ages earlier. The simile ‘ like free bloody birds ‘ serves to add fuel to the statement that the talker still feels difficult done-by.

The concluding stanza suddenly surprises and takes a lyrical bend, instead than words he describes the ‘thought of high Windowss ‘ ‘the sun-comprehending glass ‘ and the ‘deep blue air ‘ beyond them. The surprise besides includes the motion of the verse form from an awkward earthiness of ‘And conjecture he ‘s sleep togethering her ‘ to the beautiful extended emphasiss of ‘the deep blue air, that shows/ Nothing, and is nowhere, and is eternal. ‘ This last stanza is n’t informal, but alternatively more thoughtful, distant and emotional and tends to travel the talker from the context of human fallibility. A paradox is created as there is an utmost contrast between the first four stanzas and this last one as there is a switching from the rumble, ironical and conversational address to a more symbolist strength: from the mundane to the sublime. The “ nil ” and “ nowhere ” and “ endless ” beyond the Windowss is a absolutely tripled meter and seems to mention to something that is ubiquitous, but still feels empty. The usage of curse, slang and sexual slang that would n’t hold any significance if they were n’t used persistently epitomize the emptiness and the quest for what is beyond the Windowss. The Windowss act as a barrier between the talker and the existent universe exterior. In each instance, both coevalss are seeking for something that has influence and can give their life significance. While both coevalss seem to travel through really different journeys, their hunts are the same and are united together in the changeless chase of something more important in their lives. The former retired Poet Laureate Andrew Motion contrasts Larkin ‘s enthusiasm for ‘symbolist minutes ‘ and ‘freely inventive narrations ‘ with his ‘remorseless factualness ‘ and ‘crudity of linguistic communication ‘ : it is a ‘life-enhancing battle between antonyms ‘ . Larkin was an atheist seeking to happen significance in life and this reflects the emptiness that he feels. Larkin leaves the reader with an disconnected sense of something losing, an elusive empty infinite where words are of no farther usage.