Background of the Problem

The bankruptcy of Enron in December 2001 shocked the concern universe since anterior to its bankruptcy, it was merely late declared a top acting company. Its bankruptcy was a consequence of excessively much debt and high hazard investings. However, its catastrophe was non chiefly due to the mistake of the company but by other factors such as ordinances ( Niskanen, 2002 ) .

Although Enron declared bankruptcy on December 2, 2001 as a consequence of excessively much debt and hazardous investings, the job is non with Enron, it is a symptom of a greater job that must be addressed. The issue that must be confronted is related to the huge sum of wealth being transferred from the populace to private corporate directors through fiscal markets and as such authorities should happen a control mechanism to forestall similar jobs that can happen in the hereafter. It is besides deserving observing that scrutinizing houses who monitored the fiscal minutess of these houses were non able to detect or forestall the fiscal calamity ( Niskanen, 2002 ) .

The Enron debacle was merely the “tip of the iceberg” and served as symptom of the bigger fiscal crisis that would be go oning to the United States and throughout the universe. The subprime mortgage crisis was a major factor that caused the United States economic crisis. The crisis started with the lodging bubble with the rates of defaults on subprime and other adjustable rate mortgages get downing to speed up. About 1.3 million of houses were foreclosed during 2007 which increased to 79 per centum from 2006 ( RealtyTrac Staff, 2008 ) .

The 1s that were responsible for the recognition hazard as borrowers defaulted on their payments such as the major Bankss and other fiscal establishments around the Earth reported losingss of around U.S. $ 379 billion as of May 21, 2008 ( Onaran, 2008 ) . The loaners had forwarded the mortgage payments rights to third-party investors through mortgage-backed securities ( MBS ) and collateralized debt duties ( CDO ) . Many of these corporate and institutional investors possessing these MBS or CDO suffered enormous losingss as the value of the mortgage assets decreased. In add-on, this is compounded by the major diminution of the stock market in the U.S. every bit good as in other states ( Onaran, 2008 ) .

In add-on, the subprime crisis affected the growing of the U.S. economic system since fewer or more expensive loans decreased investings which are a major factor in exciting the economic system ( Bernanke, 2008 ) . Furthermore, the downswing in the lodging market resulted in the important lessening in new place building and lodging monetary values and these caused downward force per unit area on growing ( Bernanke ) .

The U.S. economic crisis triggered by the subprime bubble was ab initio considered as a domestic job. However, other establishments around the universe were affected such as the Bank of China which is the figure two bank in China. This bank announced in August 2007 that it holds US $ 9.7 billion dollars of US subprime debt ( Shaw, 2007 ) . Besides, in January of 2008, the South Korean stock market fell due to the “selling spree” of portions of U.S. mortgages ( Arirang News, 2008 ) . The International Monetary Fund ( IMF ) reported that the planetary loss due to the U.S. subprime mortgage crisis is estimated at US $ 945 billion ( Finfacts Team, 2008 ) .

Furthermore, the prostration of fiscal giants of Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, American International Group ( AIG ) and other major Bankss and fiscal establishments in the United States affected other fiscal establishments and corporations around the universe.

Based on information and information by timeline from the World Bank ( 2009 ) , the fiscal crisis escalated in the United States and Europe during 2008. This began with the take-over of Bear Stearns by J.P. Morgan in March and stoping in September and October with several large fiscal establishments under major fiscal quandaries ( World Bank, 2009 ) ..

On September 7, 2008, the authorities of the United States seized control of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. These are fiscal establishments which own or guarantee about one half of all the assets mortgaged in the state. During 2007, these companies financed about four in five U.S. mortgages.

The undermentioned hebdomad, Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy puting a record as the highest in the history of the United States affecting assets valued at $ 639 billion. Merrill Lynch was besides purchased and was taken over by the Bank of America for $ 50 billion with authorities support involved ( World Bank ) .

The authorities of the United States besides took control of American International Group ( AIG ) with an exigency bailout loan of $ 85 billion.

In Britain, its largest mortgage loaner, HBOS, was bought by Lloyds TSB for $ 18.9 billion. In Russia, the authorities promised to assist with $ 120 billion to fiscal markets and Bankss ( World Bank ) .

The U.S. Treasury formulated the Troubled Asset Relief Program ( TARP ) , this is a major plan which made it possible for the authorities to buy up to $ 700 billion of mortgage-backed securities.

The authorities of the United Kingdom nationalized the mortgage bank Bradford and Bingley with a loan bundle of $ 90 billion.

During the hebdomad of September 28, the largest bank failure in United States history happened with Washington Mutual fall ining with assets valued at $ 328 billion. A fiscal bubble besides happened in Belgium and Holland as their authoritiess each tool 49.9 per centum of equity in the operations of Fortis, a major banking and insurance company. Each authorities invested $ 16.4 billion in capital ( World Bank ) .

A hebdomad subsequently, the Dutch authorities seized control of the company in the Netherlands by puting $ 23.2 billion to buy its assets.

The operations of Fortis BENELUX states were purchased by the Gallic commercial bank, BNP Paribas.

The authorities of Germany in concurrence with commercial Bankss and federal regulators gave a $ 50 billion warrant to Hypo Real Estate. This estate company is the largest commercial belongings loaners in Europe. A hebdomad subsequently, this sum was increased to $ 68 billion.

Again, traveling to the U.S. crisis, Citigroup offered to purchase out Wachovia. This bank is ranked 4th largest in Bankss assets in the state with $ 812 billion. However, during the hebdomad a better command was made by an American bank Wells Fargo and the trade was accepted.

Traveling back to the planetary fiscal crisis in other states, France, Belgium, and Luxembourg infused $ 9.2 billion into French-Belgian bank Dexia and the authorities of Iceland bought a three-fourth equity interest with Glitnir, the county ‘s 3rd largest bank. The financess extract was valued at $ 864 million ( World Bank ) .

In Sweden, their cardinal bank announced that it will impart $ 700 million to Kaupthing, and Icelandic bank. Ireland besides made limitless warrants on retail, commercial and interbank sedimentations which covered $ 575 billion of liabilities which followed similar steps made in Austria, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Italy and Portugal. The authoritiess of Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States besides increased their bounds on sedimentation warrants ( World Bank ) .

Durng the hebdomad of October 5, 2008, the Icelandic authorities gave loan aid valued at $ 683 million to Kaupthing and took over Landsbanki, the state ‘s second-largest bank. Due to the crisis, the state is inquiring to acquire a $ 5.5 billion loan from Russia. In Spain, the authorities created a $ 40 to $ 68 billion exigency fund in order to obtain control of Spanish Bankss ( World Bank ) .

The US Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, the Bank of Canada, Sveriges Riksbank and the Swiss National Bank made cuts for their benchmark rates by half a per centum point. This marked for the first clip coordination attempts which are unprecedented in universe history. Besides, the cardinal bank of China lowered its loaning rate by 0.27 footing point which is the 2nd lessening in merely three hebdomads ( The World Bank ) .

The Icelandic authorities announced its determination to put Glitnir ( the state ‘s third-largest bank ) into receivership, seized control of Kaupthing Bank ( the state ‘s largest

The authorities of Britain announced a $ 685 billion program to reconstruct assurance in fiscal establishments. This is to include sing $ 438 billion in new bank debt and shooting $ 88 billion in equity capital. Besides, the National Bank of Ukraine took over Prominvestbank, the state ‘s 6th largest bank ( The World Bank ) .

During the hebdomad of October 12, 2008, Austria, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, and Spain invested a sum of $ 262 billion for bank recapitalization and $ 110 billion of bank assets purchases. In add-on, these authorities are coming with up to some $ 1.5 trillion in bank debt warrants ( The World Bank ) .

In the United States where the crisis started, the authorities announced that it will give a $ 250 billion committedness out of the $ 700 billion bailout bundle to assist the banking sector.

Further injections of money to deliver Bankss were made by authoritiess and the authorities of U.K. invested $ 64 billion in Royal Bank of Scotland.

The authorities of Holland invested $ 27 billion capital extract to giant banking and insurance group ING. The Swiss authorities besides injected $ 5.3 billion in the Swiss bank UBS. In bend, UBS used the financess to reassign some of its U.S. subprime mortgage related assets into a sort of a authorities fund designed to keep $ 60 billion of such troubled assets ( The World Bank ) .

In the fiscal crisis in South Korea, the authoritiess announced $ 100 billion in recognition warrants for its fiscal sector and allow Bankss to pull on its foreign militias to run into their foreign currency funding demands.

These timeline suggest of universe economic crisis spurred by the U.S. subprime crisis with major Bankss and fiscal establishments affected by the U.S. fiscal crisis. Governments around the universe came to the deliverance of troubled private Bankss and fiscal establishments and nationalized them in order to prehend control and these connote that authoritiess are larning from the jobs of fiscal globalisation which made their fiscal establishments vulnerable to a crisis. By nationalising private Bankss under the control of their authoritiess, the province is strengthened and made them less vulnerable to private investing uses such as the lessons learned in the mortgaged backed securities in the U.S. subprime crisis ( The World Bank ) .

As the fiscal crisis that started in the United States triggered a planetary crisis, this survey will analyze the economic systems of the United States, Italy, and Russia as instance surveies for fiscal market ordinances during conditions of the universe crisis.

Statement of the Problem

In the chief, this survey will analyze the economic systems of the United States, Italy and Russia in the visible radiation of the planetary crisis and fiscal markets ordinance. As such, the following specific research inquiries will be answered in the survey:

  • How have they developed historically and what grounds were at that place for the general growing and what grounds were at that place for the major up and downs?
  • What impact did their old determinations have in footings of macroeconomic policies in the short tally and long tally?
  • How did the economic system develop during the fiscal crisis in USA, Italy and Russia as can be viewed through chief economic indexs?
  • What did the three authoritiess do to alter the state of affairs? What was their motive? Were the determinations made on the footing of short term deliverance of fiscal markets or for long term stableness? Were the determinations made more on political considerations?
  • Which consequence did the determinations have and what result can we anticipate in the following 5, 10 and 20 old ages? Was the determinations macro economically efficient or driven by political motivations?

Research Aims

  • To measure the historical and comparative economic growing of the United States, Italy, and Russia ;
  • To measure the impact of their economic policies of the states mentioned ;
  • To analyse how did their economic systems develop during the planetary fiscal crisis ;
  • To find their authorities actions during the planetary fiscal crisis in order to work out the jobs induced by the crisis ;
  • To measure their determinations and their possible results in the short and long tally.

Importance and Rationale of the Study

This paper is really of import because it analyzes the impact of the planetary economic crisis in the United States, Italy and Russia and the actions of their authoritiess in contending it. Directors, economic experts and the academia have to understand why the universe is holding a planetary economic crisis and what is the function of the U.S. economic crisis in it. By understanding the factors that contribute to the crisis, policymakers can explicate solutions to minimise the job or to forestall such crisis to happen in the close hereafter.

The principle for this survey is that the there is a demand for a theoretical or conceptual model to analyse and synthesise the interrelatedness between the United States economic crisis and the planetary economic crisis peculiarly in Italy and Russia. The importance of understanding this interrelatedness has been explained in the importance of the survey subdivision.

The conceptual model which will analyse the research inquiries of this survey would be macroeconomic theory. Policymakers and the academia demand to understand the planetary deductions of the economic crisis. As such, this survey is needed by directors and decision-makers worldwide as a major part in explicating strategic and policy programs in both public and private entities in their ain states.

Definition of Footings

  • Sub-prime rates – this is one type of loan that is offered at a rate above prime to persons who do non measure up for premier rate loans. Quite frequently, sub premier borrowers are frequently turned away from traditional loaners because of their low recognition evaluations or other factors that suggest that they have a sensible opportunity of defaulting on the debt refund.
  • Mortgages – a impermanent, conditional pledge of belongings to a creditor as security for public presentation of an duty or refund of a debt.”
  • Recognition hazard – the hazard of allowing a recognition to a borrower. The hazard of default would be assumed by the fiscal establishment allowing the recognition.
  • Macroeconomicss – this field examines either the economic system as a whole or its basic divisions or sums, such as the authorities family, or concern sectors. The overall construction of the economic system and the relationships with each other set up theories and doctrines that are used to find problem-solving applications.
  • Balance of Payments ( BOP ) – a systematic record of all the economic minutess between one state and the remainder of the universe in a given period, normally one twelvemonth. Each dealing gives rise to a foreign claim for payment, recorded as a debit, or a foreign duty to pay, recorded as a recognition.
  • Balance of Trade ( BOT ) – the difference between the value of goods that a state exports and the value of goods that it imports. The BOT differs from the BOP in that it excludes capital minutess, payments for services and cargos of gold.
  • Capital Formation – the net add-on to capital stock in a given period. It represents the add-on of new capital stock to bing stock after deducting depreciation, harm and other physical impairment of the bing capital stock.
  • Capital Goods – economic goods used in the production of other goods. It includes factory edifices, machinery, trucks and tractors.
  • Devaluation – the lowering of the value of a national currency relation to gold or the currency of other states.
  • Elasticity – the comparative response of one variable to a little per centum in another variable. The construct of snap is dimensionless ; that is, it is wholly independent of units of measurings. Price snap, for illustration, is the per centum alteration in measure demanded in response of a per centum alteration in monetary value.
  • Endogenous Variable – in econometrics, any economic clip series that influences a set of economic relationships that is being studied and is besides influenced by alterations in the same set of relationships – hence a variable which is determined within the system itself.
  • Economic System – it is the system of the economic system in a state or group of states wherein there are manufacturers and consumers and the corresponding monetary value system involved. This system besides includes the function of authorities in relation to the market system in a given economic system.
  • Equilibrium – the province of an economic system wherein all the forces of alterations are balanced, so the net inclination to alter is zero.
  • Fiscal Policy – the usage of a authorities disbursement and gross bring forthing activities to accomplish specific aims.
  • Gross National Product ( GNP ) – the most comprehensive step of the entire end product of goods and services in a state.
  • Housing Start – the beginning of the building of a new residential unit designed for housework, normally counted when digging for the foundation has begun.
  • Human Capital – the investing in the instruction and accomplishments in the population of a state ;
  • Cost-Push Inflation – a rise in monetary values believed to happen because of lifting cost such as rewards wherein its addition to an extent is greater than productiveness.
  • Demand-Pull Inflation – a rise in monetary values believed to happen because consumers and investors with lifting incomes increase their wants and vie for a comparatively limited supply of goods.
  • Structural Inflation – a rise in monetary values believed to happen because of extra demand for the end product for peculiar industries even when overall economic demand is non inordinate.
  • Monetary Policy – direction of the national money supply by the Federal Reserve to guarantee the handiness of recognition in measures and at monetary values consistent with specific national aims.

Structure of the Study

This survey will be organized into five chapters. Chapter one will show the background of the job ; statement of the job ; importance and principle of the survey ; definition of footings ; and construction of the survey. Chapter two will reexamine the literature peculiarly on macroeconomic theory every bit good as the planetary economic crisis. Chapter three discusses the methodological analysis of survey peculiarly its research design.

Part one of Chapter four relatively and historically analyzes the economic systems of the United States, Italy and Russia. The chief economic indexs will be analyzed. How have they developed ( historically ) and what ground was at that place for the general growing and what grounds were at that place for the major up and downs. Short description of each in concern of how they antecedently have dealt with roars and recessions. What impact did their old determinations have ( successful or non. Short term vs. long term ) ?

Part two of Chapter four will show a current comparative analysis of the three states mentioned. How did the economic system develop during the fiscal crisis in USA, Italy and Russia ( analysis of chief indexs ) . What did the three authoritiess do to alter the state of affairs? What was their motive: changeable term deliverance of fiscal markets vs. long term stableness or possibly more political? Analysis of all the determinations made from a macroeconomic point of position. Which consequence did the determinations have and what result can we anticipate in the following 5, 10 and 20 old ages. Was the determinations macro economically efficient or driven by political motivations?

Finally, Chapter five will reason and urge based on the findings of the survey. As such, the survey will be structured chiefly as follows: Chapter 1 Introduction Background of the Problem Statement of the Problem Importance and Rationale of the Study Definition of Footings Structure of the Study Chapter 2 Review of Literature Chapter 3 Methodology Chapter 4 Research Findings, Analysis and Discussion Chapter 5 Conclusions and Recommendations



This chapter will reexamine basic economic constructs and will besides touch on province theory or the function of authorities in economic development since macroeconomics is related closely to authorities actions in supplying solutions to market failures. Economic theories of development will besides be discussed in relation to the function of macroeconomics in supplying solutions to it.

Economic Systems

The types of economic systems in the universe ( Samuelson, 1973, McConnel, 1969 ) are classified as follows: the traditional economic system, the market economic system, the bid economic system, and the assorted economic system. However, there are besides certain fluctuations to these systems.

A traditional economic system would near its economic system based on imposts and how it was done in the yesteryear. The market economic system is based on the flow of free markets and with no sum of authorities ordinance. The bid economic system is fundamentally run by the authorities and production of goods and services are besides run by them.

The assorted economic system is a combination of free market economic system and authorities ordinance. The fluctuations would go around around the extent of authorities intercession involved in the flow and production of goods and services.

Basic Market System

In an economic system, the market is where manufacturers and consumers ( McConnell, 1969, Samuelson, 1973 ) meet and monetary values are determined by the jurisprudence of supply and demand. Basically, the jurisprudence of demand provinces that if monetary values are lowered, measure demanded additions and if monetary values are additions, demand lessenings. On the one manus, the jurisprudence of supply provinces that if the monetary value additions measure of supply additions and if monetary value lessenings, measure of supply lessenings.

The equilibrium of supply and demand would find concluding monetary values such as where there is a excess or deficit. In a province of excess, equilibrium monetary values tend to diminish while in a province of deficit, equilibrium monetary values tend to increase.

The State and Macroeconomic Theory

Many of the constructs of Wallerstein ( 1974 ) saw the United States as a major economic power commanding the planetary economic system. Frank ( 1967 ) coined the U.S. as city and the developing states as orbiters. The other major industrialized states are considered portion of the city in the universe system. The orbiters are dependent upon the city and as such it is this system which is the necessary unit of analysis.

The World System Theory is besides related to province theories of development. These groups of theories are concerned with the function of the province in socio-economic development.

Assorted and contrasting paradigms on the province runing from Weberian to Marxist models will be discussed as there is resurgence on research workers in their involvements on the survey of “the state” .

As Skocpol writes: “A sudden rush of involvement in “the state” has occurred in comparative societal scientific discipline in the past decennary. Whether as an object of probe or as something invoked to explicate results of involvement, the province as an histrion or an establishment has been highlighted in an extraordinary spring of surveies by bookmans of diverse theoretical propensities from all the major subjects. The scope of subjects explored has been really broad. Students of Latin America, Africa, and Asia have examined the functions of provinces in establishing comprehensive political reforms, assisting to determine national economic development, and dickering with transnational corporations ( Skocpol 1985, p. 457 ) .”

This resurgence of involvement in province theories had become a really utile model of analysis in explicating social development. “State” , as based on the definition of Max Weber ( Roth 1968 ) argued that provinces are mandatory associations claiming control over districts and the people within them. Administrative, legal, extractive, and coercive organisations are the nucleus of any province. These organisations are variably structured in different states, and they may be embedded in some kind of constitutional-representative system of parliamentary determination devising and electoral competitions for cardinal executive and legislative stations.

Skocpol ( 1985 ) discussed that states conceived as organisations claiming control over districts and people may explicate and prosecute ends that are non merely brooding of the demands or involvements of societal groups, categories or society. This is what is truly meant by “state autonomy” . Unless such independent end preparation occurs, there is a small demand to speak approximately provinces as of import histrions. “Furthermore, one may so research the capacities of provinces to implement official ends despite the existent or possible resistance of powerful societal groups or in the face of fractious socio-economic fortunes.

Migdal ‘s ( 1988 ) strong and weak provinces continuum besides utilised World System Theory in the sense that it views provinces merely like Wallerstein as nation-states capablenesss.

As Migdal amply explains: “Capabilities include the capacities to perforate society, modulate societal relationships, extract resources, and appropriate or usage resources in determined ways. Strong provinces are those with high capablenesss to finish these undertakings while weak provinces are on the low terminal of a spectrum of capablenesss. ( Migdal 1988, pp. 4-5 ) ”

In another school of idea, Evans ‘ ( 1989 ) predatory to developmental provinces continuum is a heuristic tool in finding the grade of the province to consequence socio-economic development. As Evans ( 1989 ) explains:

“Some provinces may pull out such big sums of otherwise investable excess and supply so small in the manner of “collective goods” in return that they so impede economic transmutation. It seems sensible to name these provinces “predatory” . Zaire might be considered an archetypical instance of such a province… Other provinces, nevertheless, are besides able to further long-run entrepreneurial positions among private elites by increasing inducements to prosecute in transformative investings, and take downing the hazards involved in such investings. They may non be immune to lease seeking or to utilizing some of the societal excess for the balance, the effects of their actions promote instead than hinder transmutation. They are lawfully transformation considered as “developmental states” ( Evans 1989, pp. 562-563 ) .”

The predatory province is fundamentally one that exploits the state ‘s resources for the good of a few and non for the well being of the bulk ( Evans cited Zaire as authoritative illustration of such a province ) while the developmental provinces are those that utilized the excess of society for the betterment of its components. Evans theorized that embedded liberty is the key to a province ‘s developmental effectivity. Embedded autonomy points to the province ‘s capacity of blending two contradictory characteristics which is a “Weberian bureaucratic insularity with intense submergence in the environing societal construction. This liberty depends on the being of a treaty between the province ‘s bureaucratic machinery and the private sector to travel into shared development undertakings for the common good.

World System and the Theory of Imperialism

Harmonizing to Lenin ( 1917 ) , imperialism has certain features: ( 1 ) there is a monopolistic control of production and capital which is important in the firming and expanding of the economic base ; ( 2 ) the creative activity of “finance capital” by a fiscal oligarchy as a consequence of the amalgamation of bank capital and industrial capitals ; ( 3 ) the export of capital which has become really indispensable to the oligarchy ; ( 4 ) the formation of international capitalist monopolies which portion the universe among themselves ; and ( 5 ) the completion of the territorial division of the universe as a whole among the greatest capital powers.

Lenin viewed that in the event that the exportation of capital by developed states has reached big proportions, stagnancy sets in. This is because export capital isolates the rentiers from production more wholly which develops into a parasite which thrived on the development of labour in several states and settlements. The rentiers create and accumulate more wealth with the usage of inexpensive labour in the developing states. Capital is invested or channeled from the place state of multinational corporations where labour is expensive to the foreign colonial investing where there is cheaper labour and therefore promises higher returns.

State and Financial Institutions

Michael Todaro ( 1985 ) discussed the function of the province in developed states through pecuniary and fiscal policy caused a major impact to spread out economic activity. The ability of these developed state authoritiess to spread out and contract their money supplies and to raise the cost of borrowing in the private sector is made possible by the being of extremely organized, economically independent, and expeditiously working money and recognition markets. Fiscal resources are continuously fluxing in and out of nest eggs Bankss, commercial Bankss, and other nationally controlled public and private fiscal mediators with a lower limit of intervention ( Todaro 1985, pp. 502-503 ) .

On the contrary, markets and fiscal establishments in most underdeveloped states are extremely unorganised, frequently externally dependent, and spatially disconnected. As Todaro writes: “Many LDC commercial Bankss are simply abroad subdivisions of major private banking establishments in developed states. Their orientation hence, like that of transnational corporations, may be more toward external and less toward internal pecuniary state of affairss. The ability of 3rd universe authoritiess to modulate the national supply of money is farther constrained by the openness of their economic systems and by the fact that the accretion of foreign currency net incomes is a important but extremely variable beginning of their domestic fiscal resources ( Todaro, 1985, p. 502 ) .” Thus, the orientations of foreign bank subdivisions in developing states are outward in orientation and non focused for the benefit of domestic economic activities. Todaro farther explains: “Most of import, the commercial banking system of the LDCs restricts its activities about entirely to rationing scarce loanable financess to “credit worthy” medium and big graduated table endeavors in the modern fabrication sector. Small husbandmans and autochthonal fabrication and service sectors must usually seek finance elsewhere-usually through local money loaners and loan sharks who charge extortionate rates of involvement ( Todaro, 1985, p. 503 ) .”

Therefore, most developing states operate under a double pecuniary system, a little and mostly externally controlled money market providing to the fiscal demands of the in-between and upper-class foreign and local endeavors in the modern industrial sector, and a big unorganised, uncontrolled and exorbitant money market wherein low-income people are obliged to borrow in times of fiscal demand.

In footings of the province ‘s liberty in banking as of import, Harris ( 1990 ) , contend that successful provinces in Asia and in Latin America control or largely own the Bankss in their states. He writes:

“As in South Korea and Taiwan, the control of recognition gave great power to the Brazilian. At its extremum, two tierces of all loans were made by the collectivist Bankss ( and 40 per cent by the elephantine Banco de Brasil, the assets of which were equal to the combined assets of the top 20 private Bankss. The expropriation of public disbursement and activities was besides the cardinal factor in prolonging high domestic demand ( Harris 1990, p. 84 ) .”

The control and ownership of Bankss in South Korea, Taiwan, Brazil and other Latin American states by the province played a important function in the socio-economic development of these states.

Economic Growth and Macroeconomic Theory

Harmonizing to Rostow ( 1961 ) the phases of growing school of idea, economic growing and development follows through certain phases as follows:

  • The first phase would get down as the Traditional Society. This is a phase wherein a society has limited production resources and engineering such as a state which is predominated by agricultural systems and with a societal construction that is slow in mobility ;
  • The 2nd phase of this growing would be the Preconditions for Takeoff. The alterations in growing are in the outgrowth of basic industries, addition in societal capital and betterment in the political and societal construction ;
  • The Takeoff. In this phase, an economic system increases its rate of production and investings, fabrication additions, societal and institutional models improved quickly ;
  • The Drive to Maturity. This is a phase wherein an economic system has matured in its technological promotion and it is being harnessed to fabricate merchandises to increase grosss for the economic system ;
  • The Age of High Mass Consumption. This is a phase where the displacement will be from supply to demand. As such, mass ingestion will be the focal point alternatively of jobs of production.

As such, the footing for growing would be the development of engineering and investings of a state in order to turn and develop as an economic system ( Rostow, 1961, Todaro and Smith, 2006 ) .

The additive phases of economic growing theory have been supported by two economic experts Harrod and Domar ( Todaro 2000, pp. 80-83 ) which subsequently formulated the Harrod-Domar Growth Model which fundamentally reemphasized the importance of nest eggs, and investing in the development of an economic system. This place of stressing engineering, and investings in a state ‘s competitory advantage have besides been reiterated by Michael Porter ( 1990 ) of Harvard University.

The structuralist theory of Furtado ( 1976 ) besides were formulated on the footing of the underdevelopment experience in Latin America, nevertheless, his theories differs from Frank although there were some points where their theories would run into. The basic dogmas of Furtado ‘s theory are as follows:

  • An developing economic system is characterized non merely by a low per capita income but by certain critical structural factors such as the sectoral composing of end product, employment, and the capital stock ; economic establishments, including agricultural systems ; the joint consequence of the foregoing on snaps of supply and demand.
  • Key structural characteristics of 3rd universe economic systems are: ( a ) the apposition of a traditional mostly agricultural sector utilizing a engineering with low degrees of productiveness and a modern sector utilizing much more advanced engineering ; ( B ) the modern sector is normally established by foreign capital engaged in the primary production for capital ; ( degree Celsius ) the modern sector is characterized by a high grade of openness ( a big portion of its end product is exported and besides a big proportion of its demands for equipments and stuffs are imported ; and ( vitamin D ) developing economic systems themselves are non able to plan and fabricate the capital goods required by the modern sector.
  • The features mentioned above inhibit the coevals of an internal growing dynamic. Meanwhile, low snaps of supply and demand besides create built-in inclinations towards rising prices and balance of payments crisis.
  • Economic development consists non merely of raising per capita incomes but besides in structural transmutation, i.e. the transmutation of the economic construction of developing economic systems so that they get the internal capacity to originate and prolong economic growing.
  • The chief restraints to economic development are those outlined above, and the unequal distribution of income caused by the monopoly of elites in the economic system. Policy recommendations centre on happening ways in which authorities can step in to assist private manufacturers change these structural features via the publicity of import permutation in single developing states and the constitution of common markets among them ( Furtado: Hunt 1989 ) , pp. 123-128 ) .

As such, it is of import that authoritiess should be strong and play a cardinal function in doing economic policy determinations for the development of a state. Harmonizing to Encarta ( 2009 ) macro-economics is defined as: “Macroeconomics, subdivision of economic sciences concerned with the sum, or overall, economic system. Macroeconomics trades with economic factors such as entire national end product and income, unemployment, balance of payments, and the rate of rising prices ( Encarta, 2009 ) .”

Therefore, macroeconomics trades with whole systems and sums of a state ‘s economic input and end product and formulates development policies based on it. When the market failed as in the United States Great Depression, the Keynesian influence of Macroeconomics was used to convey economic recovery to the state.

Market Failures and the Role of Government

Markets sometimes fail because of certain structural defects in the economic system. As such, the authorities intervenes in order to salvage ( McConnell, 1969 ) the economic system from farther harm. A recent illustration is what happened here in the United States fiscal markets wherein the large fiscal establishments such as Bankss began to crumple and was endangering to impact the whole domestic economic system every bit good as globally. Therefore, the Bush disposal intervened and issued a multibillion dollar bailout.

Macroeconomic Concepts

In footings of macroeconomic constructs, people ( Samuelson, 1973, Friedman, 2008 ) should understand that the gross national merchandise is an of import step of the public presentation of the economic system, it measures entire ingestion, entire investings, entire goods and services, and net exports. From the point of view of production, it besides measures the extent of agribusiness, industry, and services public presentation.

Aggregate demand is the entire demand public presentation in the full economic system in a given state while aggregative supply is the public presentation of the production of goods and services in the full economic system. These are of import information for people since these provides them with an thought of what is traveling on in the economic system peculiarly the market for goods and services.

When the degree of unemployment ( Samuelson, 1973, Friedman, 2008 ) in an economic system is high, it is non a good index for the hereafter of its citizens since employment is of import to gain income while if there is rising prices monetary values addition and in such a state of affairs the buying power of people will worsen. During deflation, monetary values would diminish ; it might be good intelligence for consumers but non for manufacturers which depend upon moneymaking monetary values to bring forth their merchandises.

There are two basic policies wherein authorities regulators control the flow of financess in an economic system and these are through pecuniary and financial policies. Monetary policy normally is utilised through the cardinal bank or the Federal Reserve wherein the flow of money is controlled through easy or tight money policies. Easy money policy occurs when circulation of money additions through diminishing the rediscount rate of the Federal Reserve. These encourage Bankss to diminish their involvement rates so that more business communities will be encouraged to acquire a loan. If there are more loans, money circulation additions and there will be more money for disbursement and investings.

On the one manus, the Federal Reserve ( McConnell, 1969, Samuelson, 1973, Friedman, 2008 ) can deter money circulation through tight money policy. This is done by increasing the rediscount rate and the Bankss will increase their involvement rates which would ensue to lesser business communities to use for loans. Therefore, there will be a lessening in the circulation of money available for investings or disbursement.

Fiscal policy is utilized when the ( Samuelson, 1973, Friedman, 2008 ) authorities sees that there is a demand to increase or diminish money to go around in the economic system. Increasing the money circulation could be done through public disbursement such as edifice substructures, public employment, etc. These would ensue to more employment, and income ensuing to more available money for disbursement.

Fiscal policy can besides be utilized through revenue enhancement wherein money circulation can be controlled through higher revenue enhancements. On the one manus, higher revenue enhancements can besides supply the authorities with more money to pass for authorities undertakings and once more increase money circulation.

Macroeconomic theory calls for the use of nest eggs, investings, pecuniary policy every bit good as financial policy in implementing economic alteration and development which will ensue to the addition in aggregative end product as reflected through the Gross Domestic Product ( GDP ) of a state. Therefore, the theoretical model of this survey will be based on it.


The World System Theory model of Wallerstein ( 1974 ) was influenced by the fundamentally viewed the universe as a planetary capitalist system dominated by the industrialised states led by the United States. These industrialised states were called as Metropolis and the development states which were dependent upon them as orbiters.

Migdal ( 1988 ) which besides utilized the World System Theory ( WST ) focused on strong and weak provinces continuum under the planetary capitalist system. Strong provinces such as the U.S. controls the universe economic system and weak provinces are dependent and disconnected merely like the “satellites” in dependence theory.

Todaro ( 1985 ) argues that markets and fiscal establishments in most underdeveloped states are extremely unorganised and frequently externally dependent, and spatially fragmented. Many commercial Bankss in developing states are simply abroad subdivisions of major private banking establishments in industrialised states such as the United States. Their orientations merely like transnational corporations are more towards external instead than toward internal pecuniary state of affairss.

The openness of 3rd universe economic systems and their dependence upon foreign currency net incomes and investings would do them vulnerable to external jobs such as U.S. crisis.

Wallerstein ( 1974 ) World System Theory views the planetary economic system and market as dominated by the nucleus states and supported by buffer provinces called semi-periphery states. Besides, the fringe states are largely if non all from the developing states and these are the 1s who are dependent and exploited by the industrialised states. The fringe states are the 1s that are more susceptible and vulnerable to external crisis such as the U.S subprime crisis since their trades and foreign dependent industries would be affected by jobs in the industrialised states.

Macroeconomic theory would be an effectual tool in contending market failures such as the current planetary crisis and these calls for the use of nest eggs, investings, pecuniary policy every bit good as financial policy in implementing economic alteration and development which will ensue to the addition in aggregative end product as reflected through the Gross Domestic Product ( GDP ) of a state. Therefore, the theoretical model of this survey would be anchored on macroeconomic theory and analysis.


Research Aims

This survey will be conducted based on the undermentioned research aims:

  • To measure the historical and comparative economic growing of the United States, Italy, and Russia ;
  • To measure the impact of their economic policies of the states mentioned ;
  • To analyse how did their economic systems develop during the planetary fiscal crisis ;
  • To find their authorities actions during the planetary fiscal crisis in order to work out the jobs induced by the crisis ;
  • To measure their determinations and their possible results in the short and long tally.

Quantitative, Descriptive, and Qualitative Research Methods

Even though the survey can be explained chiefly through the historical method, the author included besides some assorted methods of research such as the quantitative, and descriptive research methods. These assorted methods have been included because the natures of the phenomena being studied are quite recent and still go oning in the United States, Italy, and Russia.

The descriptive method was used to back up to complement the historical method. The phenomena being studied were merely recent and still go oning and so the descriptive method was used to depict the events and facts in order for the reader to understand the state of affairs.

In add-on, the informations were analyzed through charts and tabular arraies using chart analysis and tendency finding. The growing rates and tendencies of fiscal and economic informations were computed so as to find the impact of a peculiar variable to another.

Quantitative informations uses Numberss. It tends to be based on numerical measurings of specific facets of phenomena ; it abstracts from peculiar cases to seek general description or to prove causal hypotheses ; it seeks measurings and analyses that are easy replicable by other research worker ( Thomas, 2003 ) .This is a good attack to be used in this research because by holding this attack the research worker could understand the phenomena being studied.

Theory Construction

Hempel ‘s methodological analysis ( Hempel, 1968, 1973 ) is based on the construct of empirical scientific discipline which is really applicable peculiarly in the physical scientific disciplines. Harmonizing to this position: “ … all account is achieved finally by mention to causal or correlativity ancestors. In the instance of the Fieldss of psychological science and the societal and historical subjects harmonizing to some, even in biological science – the constitution of causal or correlativity connexions, while desirable and of import, is non sufficient. Proper apprehension of the phenomena studied in these Fieldss is held to necessitate other types of account ( Hempel, 1973: p. 179 ) .”

As such, harmonizing to Hempel, one of the explanatory methods that have been developed for this purpose is that of functional analysis. This method of analysis has somewhat found some jobs in the country of societal scientific discipline because whereas in natural philosophies, experimentation can me do in a research lab, it is hard to insulate variables in the societal scientific disciplines and organize an experiment. Therefore, the Hempellian school of idea may non be practical to utilize in the societal scientific disciplines.

May Brodbeck ‘s article on “Methodological individualities: Definition and Reduction” , ( Brobbeck, 1968: pp. 280-304 ) slightly supported Hempel ‘s attack of scientific analysis as applied to sociological jobs. As Brodbeck would reason that to compare Indians are red-skinned with Indians are vanishing. She opined that in the former, each and every Indian is said to be red-skinned, while in the latter Indians as a group are said to be vanishing, that is, decreasing in population. As such, harmonizing to Brodbeck, when a belongings is attributed to a group jointly, so that the group itself is logically the topic of the proposition, instead than distributively, in which instance, each and every member of the group could logically be the topic of the proposition, so we have a group belongings. Clearly, there is no issue about the happening of group belongingss.

Therefore, Brodbeck has a point here in footings of shaping and distinguishing single belongingss from group belongingss. On the other manus, Emile Durkheim ( 1968: pp. 245-254 ) contend that basically persons were and are born with bing societal constructions which influence the person.

As Durkheim argued:

“But in world there is in every society a certain group of phenomena which may be differentiated from those studied by the other natural scientific disciplines. When I fulfill my duties as brother, hubby, or citizen, when I execute my contracts, I perform responsibilities which are defined, externally to myself and my Acts of the Apostless, in jurisprudence and in usage. Even if they conform to my ain sentiments and I feel their world subjectively, such world is still nonsubjective, for I did non make them ; simply inherited them through my instruction. How many times it happens, furthermore, that we are nescient of the inside informations of the duties incumbent upon us, and that in order to introduce ourselves with them we must confer with the jurisprudence and its authorised translators! Similarly, the church member finds the beliefs and patterns of his spiritual life ready-made a birth ; their being prior to his ain implies their being outside of himself ( Durkheim, 1968: p. 245 ) .”

As such, Durkheim emphasized the being of societal facts and belongingss that already exist as a societal construction that affects the behaviour of persons. Besides these constructions are outside or external to the person.

In another school of idea, Ernest Gellner ( 1968: pp. 254-269 ) as written in his essay entitled, Holism versus Individualism” , argued that certain state of affairss encourage temperament or balance between holistic theory and individuality. As Gellner put it:

“To the individualist, his ain place appears as true that it hardly needs the verification of really carried out riddances, whilst, he joyously points out that in pattern the holist can and does merely near his establishments, etc. , through what concrete people can make, which seems to the individualists a practical presentation and inexplicit confession of the absurdness of holistic theory. By contrast ( and with orderly symmetricalness ) the holist sees in the fact that the individualist continues to speak in holist footings a practical presentation of the unworkability of individuality, and he surely non see the fact that he can merely near groups and persons to be something which he had implicitly denied and which could number against him. Both sides find comfort in the existent patterns of the opposition… ( Gellner, 1968: p. 256 ) .”

What is at issue here is the ontological position of the entities referred to by the holistic footings. As the impression of ontological position is non clear as it might be in the argument between holistic theory versus individuality, Gellner pointed to something which is of import to a reductionist and which to him is an index of being — – viz. , causing.

Gellner farther writes:

“He does non wish to let the Whole could of all time be a cause and to take a firm stand that accounts which make it appear that it is can be translated into others. That which is a mere concept can non causally consequence that which “really exists” ; this is, I suspect, the feeling of the individualist, the reductionist. This is in concurrence with the truism that a whole is made up of its parts, that nil can go on to a whole without something go oning to either some at least of its parts or their common dealingss… ( Gellner, 1968: p. 256 ) .”

Therefore, the holistic counter-argument plants in contrary: if something ( a ) is a causal factor ( B ) can non be reduced, so in some sense it truly and independently exists. Thus, Gellner called for a balance between holistic theory and individuality. He argued that non all things can be reduced to individualistic footings. On the other manus, non all things can be explained in societal or group footings.

In another position, Watkins ( 1968 ) does non precisely agree with Gellner and even with Hempel. As he argued: “I am non an advocator of mechanism but I have mentioned it because I am an advocator of an correspondent rule in societal scientific discipline, the rule of methodological individuality. Harmonizing to this rule, the ultimate components of the societal universe are single people who act more or less suitably in the visible radiation of their temperaments and apprehension of their state of affairs. Every complex societal state of affairs, establishment, or event is the consequence of a peculiar constellation of persons, their temperaments, state of affairss, beliefs, and physical resources, and environment. There may be unfinished or half-way accounts of such large-scale phenomena until we have deduced an history of their statements about the temperaments, beliefs, resources, and inter-relations of persons. And merely as mechanism is contrasted with the organicist thought of physical Fieldss, so methodological individuality is contrasted with sociological holistic theory or organicism ( Watkins, 1968: pp. 270-271 ) .”

From holistic theory ‘s point of position, societal systems constitute ‘wholes ‘ in the sense that some of the large-scale behaviour is governed by macro-laws which are in kernel sociological in the sense they are ‘sui generis ‘ and non to be explained as merely regularities or inclinations ensuing from the interaction of single behaviours. The behaviour of persons harmonizing to sociological holistic theory can be explained at least partially in footings of such Torahs. An illustration of this sociological factor is the long-run cyclical moving ridge in economic life which is supposed to self-propelling, unmanageable, and unaccountable in footings of human activity.

Watkins argued that societal inclinations are the merchandise of human features, activities, and state of affairss, of people ‘s ignorance and indolence every bit good as their cognition and aspiration. He besides mentioned that there are two countries where methodological individuality does non work. The first is a chance state of affairs where accidental and unpredictable abnormalities in human behaviour have a reasonably regular and predictable consequence. The 2nd sort of societal phenomenon to which methodological individuality is unsuitable is where some sort of physical connexion between people ‘s nervous systems short-circuits their intelligent control and causes automatic, and possibly in some sense appropriate bodily responses ( Watkins, 1968 ) .

The place of the methodological analysis of this survey is anchored on sociological holistic theory and macroeconomic theory. It is the place of the research worker that societal and economic phenomena can be more explained from a societal systems point of position. Although, it would be agreeable, in a sense, that collective single behaviour would organize certain societal inclinations ( e.g. , the liquidness penchant behaviour of investors in the event of lower involvement rates in the fiscal system ) , most societal phenomena could be explained in holistic signifiers such as traditions, civilizations, societal stratification, Torahs, fiscal system, administrative, and political construction.

Data Gathering Method

The information aggregation and assemblage of this survey were based on hunts in the cyberspace since it is the lone manner to garner informations worldwide. The information comes from the undermentioned beginnings:

  • Office of the Comptroller of the Currency/US Department of Treasury
  • US Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis
  • Federal Reserve System, Flow of Funds Accounts of the United States
  • Reuters informations base
  • World Bank
  • Italy authorities bureaus
  • Russian authorities beginnings

Cogency of Datas

The informations are valid since these were taken from dependable beginnings in the web. Most of the informations came from valid beginnings such as the U.S. section of commercialism, Reuters, World Bank, U.S. Department of Treasury, Federal Reserve System, and Company Annual Reports, Italy authorities web sites, and Russian authorities web sites.

Originality and Restrictions

The informations are original. The restrictions are that these beginnings came from the web and some of these informations came from secondary beginnings.