Economic development in any economic system requires sustained economic growing Mobarak, 2003. Economic growing can be defined as the increasing capacity of the economic system to fulfill the wants of goods and services of the economic agents of society, thereby increasing the populating criterion of the people of the state ( Sentsho 2000 ) .Facts and figures provided in growing literature show that economic growing of Pakistan remained extremely volatile since independency. This volatility in economic growing is chiefly due to miss of uninterrupted political government. In the 65 old ages history of Pakistan, democratic authorities did non govern even for a individual whole decennary. Military powers indiscriminately interfered in administration affairs and ruled the state for more than 30 old ages. This non-democratic intercession resulted in the variableness of political governments that leads to fluctuating economic growing rates throughout of the history ( Carmignani 2003 ) .

Lack of uninterrupted political government consequences in political instability, which adversely affects economic public presentation through multiple channels.Democratic and non-democratic governments have different precedences and aim different sectors of economic system without following a common national economic policy. The deficiency of common nonsubjective between two governments result in higher volatility in economic growing and therefore the aim of economic development can non be achieved ( Barro 1999 ) . This survey considers macroeconomic direction as a cardinal instrument for accomplishing higher growing rates and compares it between democratic and military governments. By macroeconomic direction we mean direction of macroeconomic policies i.e. pecuniary policy, financial policy, and exchange rate policy.Effective macroeconomic direction is helpful in heightening economic growing by commanding rising prices through appropriate pecuniary policy, and minimising financial and current history shortage through financial and exchange rate policies severally ( Mehmood 2009 ) .

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

However macroeconomic direction is non the lone manner through which different political governments affect economic public presentation. Economic success depends on multiple factors hence macroeconomic direction is necessary but non the sufficient status for high economic growth.After a brief literature reappraisal in approaching subdivision, this survey presents a conceptual model which clarifies the channel through which political governments are associated with economic growing. Following subdivision analyzes the macroeconomic direction by comparing its results on economic growing, rising prices, financial and current history shortage during different political governments. Differences in these results are besides briefly discussed in this subdivision. Concluding subdivision concludes the survey by emphasizing that Pakistan has to accomplish democratic adulthood for successful macroeconomic direction and hence sustainable economic growing.

A brief expression at relevant Literature:

The ultimate mark of the macroeconomic policies in any economic system is the accomplishment of high and sustainable economic growing. However economic policies are capable to many other factors including economic liberalisation, political construction and stableness, resource gift, and international personal businesss of an economic system. This subdivision reviews some of theoretical every bit good as empirical surveies conducted to analyze the relationship between administration mechanism and macroeconomic policies. Different political governments have different attitude toward macroeconomic direction of an economic system, so a closer expression at literature will assist us to pull reasonable illations about the impact of political construction on macroeconomic indexs.

Harmonizing to fisher ( 1991 ) macroeconomic direction is concerned with the direction of macroeconomic policies of an economic system which include pecuniary policy, financial policy, and exchange rate policy. Based on these policy steps macroeconomic direction trades with the direction of rising prices, budget shortage, and balance of payment. These macroeconomic variables have important impact on short tally every bit good as long run economic growth.Author argued that higher rate of rising prices, financial shortage, and balance of payment crisis show misdirection of macroeconomic policies and indicate that authorities has loosed the control over the economic system. Author concluded that it is non merely macroeconomic policies that affair for economic success, but stableness in macroeconomic direction every bit good as associated political governments and policy reforms are besides of import for economic growing.

Barro ( 1999 ) argued that democracy is non a requirement for economic growing of any state. For a state with hebdomad establishments and small democracy, regulation of jurisprudence and belongings rights are more of import than democracy for exciting economic growing and investing. He farther explained that democracy on one manus promotes redistribution of wealth and land reforms which cut down offense rates and enhance stableness. On the other manus it reduces work and investing inducements in the presence of higher income revenue enhancements and other transportations. This survey besides highlighted two chief determiners for advancing democracy i.e. higher per capita income and instruction installations. These two factors improve populating criterion of persons and promote democracy. Writer did n’t underestimate the function of democracy in economic development but he stressed that the impact of democracy will be negligible on economic growing of state holding inauspicious jurisprudence and order state of affairss and hebdomad institutional model. Writer concluded that for accomplishing long tally and stable democracy and economic growing, short tally accent must be given to keep jurisprudence and order and institutional development.

Tavares and Wacziarg ( 2001 ) through empirical observation analyzed the different channels through which democracy affects economic growing. Author argued that democracy affect economic growing indirectly through different variables which may include authorities size and outgos, distribution of income, and accretion of human and physical capital. Analysis based on panel informations of 15 states over the period of 1965 to 1994. Major findings show that democracy on one manus increase economic growing by bettering the stock of human capital and minimising income inequality. On the other manus it may impede growing by increasing authorities ingestion outgos and take downing the stock of physical capital. Overall effects of democracy found to be negative and writer concluded that democratic authoritiess provide instruction and cut down inequality at the disbursal of physical capital accretion.

Harmonizing to Mubarak ( 2003 ) economic development of any state requires non merely higher but sustainable economic growing rates. Economic development enables the society to confront economic, environmental and natural uncertainnesss and let its economic agents to maintain on bettering their life criterions. This survey established the nexus between democracy and economic development by sing volatility in economic growing. Following the Ramey and Ramey ( 1995 ) , this survey through empirical observation examined the informations of 80 developing states during 1972 to 1998 and concludes that higher degree of democracy leads to minimise the volatility in economic growing which consequences in long run economic development.

Jong ( 2006 ) through empirical observation examined the impact of political instability on economic growing. Author argued that empirical surveies used different indexs like figure of putschs, political blackwashs, and political revolutions for mensurating political instability. As these indexs capture some of the facets of political instability so they can non be considered as perfect placeholders for mensurating political instability. This survey highlighted four dimensions of political instability which include civil protest, politically motivated aggression, instability of political government and eventually instability within the political government. Empirical findings derived from panel informations analysis of 98 states over the period of 1984-2003 revealed that civil protest and instability of political government have important effects on long tally economic growing. Author concluded that political instability is a multidimensional construct and every dimension of instability consequence economic growing otherwise through different channels.

The relationship between democracy and economic growing remained inclusive both in theoretical every bit good as empirical literature. No direct decision has been drawn either in cross subdivision or state specific analysis. Doucouliagos andUlubasoglu ( 2006 ) challenged this consensus of an inconclusive relationship by using meta-regression analysis. This survey reviewed 81 published documents on democracy-growth association. Major findings leveled that on norm there is no grounds of democracy being damaging to economic growing. Furthermore democracy may non hold direct effects on growing but it significantly affects growing rates through indirect channels. Political democracy promotes economic growing through increasing the accretion of human capital, take downing the rising prices, minimising political instability and heightening economic freedom. Writer concluded that whatever other effects democracy may hold on society, its net consequence on the economic system is non damaging.

Santhirasegaram ( 2007 ) argue that political freedom for choosing the leading is a challenge for accomplishing rapid economic growing in developing states. Author presented two beliing positions sing relationship between democracy and economic growing. Harmonizing to the pessimistic position democracy is non good for economic growing. This position is based on the statement that democratic policies leads to higher demand for public assistance disbursement, which cut down societal economy and hence capital accretion. There is a trade-off between democratic administration and rapid economic growing. These two ends are incompatible, and developing state must take democracy or stuff growing, non both. On the other manus optimistic position explains that democracy promote capitalist economy, which result in efficient allotment of resources and creativeness. Democracy outputs long run growing rates and consequence in sustainable economic growing in long tally. This survey through empirical observation analyzed above statements by using panel informations for 70 developing states over the period of 2000 to 2004, by using least square quantitative methodological analysis. Consequences revealed that political freedom is negatively and significantly associated with economic growing in developing states.

Harmonizing to Zakaria and Fida ( 2009 ) there are three schools of ideas that explain the relationship between democracy and economic growing. Harmonizing to struggle position autocratic governments promote economic growing as they do n’t hold to do popular investings at the cost of profitable investings. Harmonizing to this position democracy is luxury that developing states can non afford. Compatibility position stresses that democracy promote economic growing by increasing motive of persons to work and put, net income maximising private activities, and efficient allotment of resources. Furthermore under democratic authorities struggles among the states are decently managed which improve universe peace and hence promote economic growing. Finally disbelieving position provinces that there is no systematic relationship between democracy and economic growing. Institutional strength, industrial construction and authorities policies are more of import than government to advance economic growing. This survey explores the empirical relationship between democracy and per capita GDP in Pakistan over the period 1947 to 2006. Result revealed that there is a hebdomad negative relationship between democracy and economic growing in instance of Pakistan.

Yang ( 2010 ) through empirical observation examined the impact of political and economic liberalisation on volatility of economic growing. Economic liberalisation is measured though the extent of openness of an economic system to the remainder of the universe while political liberalisation is analyzed by sing democratic publicity. Panel of 158 states was analyzed over the period of 1970-2005. Major findings revealed that economic liberalisation significantly reduces growing volatility while political liberalisation seems to increase macroeconomic instability. Joint consequence of both types of liberalisation remained undistinguished on growing volatility. Based on the findings writer recommended that developing states should see economic liberalisation foremost so travel towards political democratisation for accomplishing sustainable economic growing.

Ministry of finance ( 2010 ) developed a study for increasing sustainability and fight of Pakistan ‘s economic system. Harmonizing to this study Pakistan have to follow long run macroeconomic direction and stableness which is non possible without stable democratic administration construction. Macroeconomic direction is indispensable to avoid higher budget shortage, public debt, rising prices and balance of payment crises. Sound macroeconomic direction is indispensable for retrieving investor ‘s assurance that will take to higher and sustainable economic growing. It is besides necessary for cut downing dependence on foreign assistance and grants through steering domestic nest eggs, bettering gross aggregations, and hiking private investing. Successful macroeconomic direction is non possible without guaranting belongings rights and contract enforcement, which in bend depends on stable and strong democratic authorities. Therefore it can be concluded that democracy promotes sustainable economic growing through guaranting sound macroeconomic direction.

Aims of survey:

The chief aims of this survey are:

To analyse how macroeconomic direction is linked with economic growing

To compare the macroeconomic direction patterns of different political governments

To look into the factors for unstable macroeconomic direction and growing variableness

To foreground the demand for stable democratic authorities to accomplish economic success

Conceptual Model:

The administration mechanism of any state affects its economic public presentation through multiple channels, which may include keeping jurisprudence and order conditions, institutional growing, macroeconomic direction, and foreign policies etc. However, in this survey we have analyzed the impact of administration construction on macroeconomic direction, and therefore on economic growing of Pakistan.Governance construction includes the impact of democratic and bossy governmentswhile macroeconomic direction include direction of macroeconomic policies i.e. pecuniary, financial, and exchange rate policies which are used to find rising prices, budget shortage, and balance of payment in any economy.Following diagram shows how governance construction is related with economic growing through macroeconomic direction.

Budget Deficit

Fiscal PolicyFigure 1: Self Extracted

Economic Growth



Monitory Policy


Exchange Rate Policy

Federal bureau of prisons

On one manus economic growing to a great extent depends on the macroeconomic policies of any economic system. These policies affect cardinal economic variables as shown in above figure, and hence determine economic public presentation of that state. Macroeconomic direction i.e. direction of macroeconomic policies, on the other manus is affected by administration mechanism of that country.Therefore analysis of macroeconomic direction is important for understanding economic growing under different political governments.


Pakistan has remained under different political governments sinceindependence. Military has stepped in for three times and ruled the state for more than 30 old ages. Intervention of non-democratic military authoritiess is the major ground behind the political instability in Pakistan. This political instability leads to fluctuating economic growing over the decennaries. Therefore the aim of high and sustainable economic growing has non achieved during 65 old ages history. This survey considers macroeconomic direction as a key deciding economic success and compares it between democratic and military governments. Our analysis is based on comparing of cardinal macroeconomic variables mentioned in above model between democratic and non-democratic regimesover the period of 1960 to 2012. We have divided the clip period into five decennaries and two old ages, dwelling of three democratic and three military governments. Respective clip period and public presentation of macroeconomic variables are summarized in following tabular array.

Political governments and their clip period



( Military )


( Democracy )


( Military )


( Democracy )


( Military )


( Democracy )








Budget Deficit














Current Account Deficit







Foreign Aid







Table 1: Shows Average growing rates for GDP and Inflation, mean % of budget shortage, current history shortage, and foreign assistance to GDP.

Beginnings: Zaidi ( 2009 ) , Mehmood. et all 2009, Economic study of Pakistan 2010-11.

Above informations set shows that military authoritiess performed relatively good than democratic governments. GDP growing rates remained high during non-democratic authoritiess, with low degrees of rising prices, financial shortage, and current history shortage. While democratic authorities failed to accomplish high growing rates and commanding rising prices, budget shortage and current history shortage. Therefore on the footing of our informations we can state that military governments are attributed with good macroeconomic direction as compared to democratic authoritiess. Can we reason that military authorities is suited administration construction for the economic success of Pakistan? ? ?

The reply is a large no due to several grounds. First if military is suited for pull offing the economic personal businesss of state so why there has been a down autumn in the economic public presentation after the terminal of every armed forces government? The reply lies in the fact that we have failed to accomplish sustainable economic growing chiefly due to the intercession of military in administration which resulted in political instability ( Barro 1999 ) . On one manus strengths of economic agents are non promoted because whole system is owned and controlled by a individual person instead than market forces.On the other manus persons are promoted alternatively of establishments for accomplishing short term seeable consequences. Therefore whole concentration is given to results alternatively of beef uping the foundations of system. As engagement of persons or their representatives is non considered in developing the policies, so they do n’t have the system which resulted in prostration of that specific policy model after the terminal of “ one adult male show ” and leads to volatility in economic public presentation.

Second military is good for macroeconomic direction if we consider merely outcomes of its macroeconomic policies. However how these results are achieved is every bit of import. Our informations for foreign assistance influxs shows that foreign assistance to Pakistan remained high during military governments as compared to democratic governments.Pervez Musharraf and Ayub Khan ‘s clip period shows high economic public presentation due to higher degrees of foreign aid ( Chauvet 2002 ) .If appropriate financial policy were implemented so we had adequate resources to finance our outgos. Therefore if we consider financing side of our economic system, it shows failure of macroeconomic direction of military authoritiess.

Third, military governmentsachieved public support by stressing on that sector of economic system which can turn fast and demo seeable consequences. Developmental outgos remained low which adversely affected societal sector of economic system ( Carmignani 2003 ) . Due to this intercession of military in economic activity, we have failed to develop and implement national economic policy. Due to command economic system, market forces could non work in their true kernel so economic system remained dead due to miss of competition and hence inventions.

Finally we can state that although military authoritiess performed good in instance of macroeconomic direction, but macroeconomic direction is necessary but non the sufficient status for sustainable economic growing. For long tally sustainable economic growing publicity of independent establishments is necessary and military authoritiess failed to develop these establishments which resulted in variableness of economic public presentation after every military government ( Zakaria and Fida 2009 ) .

Due to intervention of military powers we have failed to advance values of a pure democratic system which include citizen ‘s authorization, protagonism, transparence, engagement and successful sequence. Due to miss of these values democratic authoritiess failed to bring forth expected consequences. Today our political parties are dependent on their top leading without any successful replacing. Therefore in order to develop the strengths of persons and produce quality leaders from within society have to advance democratic system.


This survey considered macroeconomic direction as a cardinal determiner of sustainable economic growing. Economic public presentation of different democratic and military governments is evaluated on the footing of their expertness in macroeconomic direction. Our consequences revealed that military authoritiess performed good for pull offing macroeconomic policies as compared to democratic authoritiess. However macroeconomic direction in non the lone parametric quantity for measuring the public presentation of a specific political government. Therefore if democratic authoritiess failed to execute good in this facet, we can non reason that military should run the economic system. As Quaid-e-Azam, Muhammad Ali Jinnah said: “ Pakistan is made for the improvement of the people populating in it. Peoples will themselves choose their Leader and it ‘s the duty of the Leader to carry through the demands of the people and work twenty-four hours and dark for this Motherland ” ( Zaidi 2009 ) . Almost 50 % of our state is populating below poorness line, so to eliminate poorness we need to advance democracy, as explained by Democracy theory by Robert Petric: “ A state holding a better ranking in the Democratic index will be holding a better ranking in the Poverty decrease index. So there is a connexion in both and we can clearly obtain a consequence that Democracy is a solution for poorness decrease in a state ” ( Yang 2010 ) .

To reason we can state that democratic authoritiess can execute good if we let them to make so, as they are making in 106 states of the universe. For accomplishing high and sustainable economic growing let the democracy prevail and mature.