EU has come under increasing unfavorable judgment for its unjust trade policies. During G8 acmes, it is common to see dissenters fighting to do their voices heard. Most of these dissenters are out to advance just trade between Europe and the underdeveloped universe ( Palmer et Al, 2006 ) . The end is to hold international trade that is characterised by a win-win policy. Unfortunately international trade has largely favoured western states because they have stronger fiscal and political bargaining power ( Khor, 2005 ) . In order for the European Union to accomplish just trade with its trading spouses in the development states, trade has to be done in equal footings ( Palmer et Al, 2006 ) . This implies that trade barriers have to be removed. This would necessitate new crystalline constructions and policy. The EU is expected to besides get down by opening up its markets. Opening of markets require much more than subscribing statute laws that call for free trade. In world, there are no ordinances that prevent husbandmans from developing states from marketing their produced within the boundary lines of the EU. The existent job is that subsidies granted to European husbandmans make it hard for the African husbandman to vie with European husbandmans within the Union. This is non in any manner different from declining to allow entree to the European markets for hardworking husbandmans from developing states.

The EU has continued to transport on with protectionist policies in a command to up with the demand of husbandmans who have voting powers. Politicss is the chief ground why protectionism is still around the corner ( Khor, 2005 ) . The issue of subsidies requires much more attempt to be resolved. It is dearly-won for the authoritiess that support them. It besides goes on to advance unjust trading patterns in the planetary economic system, a move that has been widely condemned by the WTO in its understandings ( Khor, 2005 ) . Meanwhile Europe is expected to cut back on this pattern and extinguish the usage of farm subsidies by the terminal of 2011, which is a promise that might be hard for both the Europe and US to implement ( Khor, 2005 ) . At the same clip, if the position quo remains uninterrupted, it is upseting to larn that the planetary agricultural industry would go on to witness unjust trade.

The hypothesis for this survey is that protectionism is decelerating down the procedure of globalization. At the terminal of this survey, the research conducted would either corroborate or disregard this hypothesis sing the fact that it is a conditional and unseasoned statement. In the ulterior chapters of this work, the hypothesis shall be tested against the world that obtains in the field. In order to prove the hypothesis, this survey shall get down by puting out a theoretical model and place constructs. It would besides research the assorted trade patterns that are presently used in the agricultural sector in Europe. It shall travel on to reexamine the planetary trading system and the assorted signifiers of trade limitations used by states in international trade.

2. ) Theory and elucidation of the chief constructs

Protectionism: This refers to the assorted schemes that authoritiess and regional administrations use to barricade trade with other states and parts ( Sicilia & A ; Cruikshank, 2000 ) . Protectionist policies are frequently implemented through the usage of import subsidies, import duties, trade quotas and other policies that purpose at controling the inflow of goods into a state or part in an attempt to forestall foreign competition within local markets. Governments today make usage of no-tariff trade limitations ( Sicilia & A ; Cruikshank, 2000 ) . This is because planetary trade understandings have led to the riddance of trade duties in most states.

Dumping: Dumping refers to a state of affairs whereby a company or maker exports his or her merchandises at a monetary value which is lower than the on he sells the green goods at his or her place state ( Brander & A ; Krugman, 1983 ) . The chief ground why this happens is that these manufacturers have to vie with other manufacturers who sell cheaper in the foreign markets. If he or she fails to take down the monetary values for his trade goods abroad, it would be impossible to sell in these foreign markets. The pattern of dumping can harm the domestic economic system by cut downing the gross revenues volume every bit good as the equilibrium monetary value ( Brander & A ; Krugman, 1983 ) . In the worse instance scenario, it puts domestic houses out of concern and leads to a general bead in profitableness and an addition in unemployment. Many people misunderstand the term dumping and believe any thing that sells truly inexpensive is dumping. If a Chinese house sells cell phones at 10 lbs per phone in Beijing and markets those phones at 10 lbs here in the UK, the phones are inexpensive ; but this should non be confused with dumping. It becomes dumping if the phones are sold in China for 10 lbs, and here in the UK, the same Chinese house starts selling those phones for 6 lbs. However, dumping is frequently common with absolutely competitory goods such as agricultural merchandises.

Anti-dumping: Anti-dumping refers to corrective step that is used by domestic economic systems that are victims of dumping from foreign industries. The intent of anti-dumping is to guarantee that just trade is re-established and the negative effects of dumping are eliminated in the exploited state ( Brander & A ; Krugman, 1983 ) . The WTO strongly encourages the usage of anti-dumping steps to battle against the pattern of dumping in international trade. Anti-dumping is different from protectionism in that its end is non to shut domestic markets to foreign rivals. Alternatively, these steps are at that place to advance free and just trade. Dumping is non a just trade policy ( Sicilia & A ; Cruikshank, 2000 ) . Anti-dumping provides alleviation and helps handle the harm caused in the local economic system by the foreign company that dumps its merchandises in the local market. In some cases, states use a longer clip to implement relatiative policies so as to take advantage of the state of affairs protect their markets even if that has to be merely for a few months or old ages.

Non-tariff barriers: Non-tariff barriers refer to merchandise policies used to curtail imports other than import duties. Import duties had been identified as one of the easiest protectionist policy used by authoritiess to barricade imports in the 1980s ( Krugman, 1990 ) . Today, protectionism has taken a new dimension. Alternatively of enforcing duties, many economic systems restrict imports utilizing other steps. For case, when there is eruption of bird grippe, many authoritiess take advantage of that chance to curtail the import of birds. Even after the eruption of the disease has been contained, the import prohibitions remain in topographic point for several months or old ages. These protectionist authoritiess claim its all about safety when in world ; they merely want to utilize the chance to shut their markets for some clip. China is one of the fastest turning economic systems today, and exports all kinds of merchandises abroad. After the “ corrupt ” milk dirt a twosome of old ages ago, many western authoritiess closed their markets to Chinese makers mentioning safety concerns. Another illustration of non-trade barriers includes subsidies, offseting responsibilities and prolonged anti-dumping steps. Today, the usage of non-tariff barriers has become the trade limitation tool of pick.

Globalisation has many different definitions in the assorted academic subjects today. In economic sense, globalization implies that more states are taking active portion in the universe ‘s economic system be it by bring forthing and exporting goods and services or importing them ( Donner, 2005 ) . Economic globalization is altering the universe and assisting to eliminate poorness in many parts across the universe since manufacturers are able to market the goods and services in markets that are 1000s of kilometers off. This has been made possible thanks to new information and communicating engineering. The Internet has helped to ease planetary trade between states ( Donner, 2005 ) . This is because all it takes today for a concern adult male to make is register on a B2B web site from London and station messages about what he needs. If for case he needs chocolate or java, a husbandman in far off Vietnam or Africa who has the green goods in stock responds to the advert. In merely a chink, a concern partnership is formed. Such is the nature of advancement that has taken topographic point in universe trade.

GATT and the World Trade Organization:

The GATT was reviewed in 1994 and upgraded to enforce new ordinances onto member states. One of the most recognizable alterations included the debut of the World Trade Organisation ( WTO ) . All the 75 signers of GATT and the all the member provinces of the European Communities ( EC ) were amongst the establishing members of the WTO ( Sicilia & A ; Cruikshank, 2000 ) . The WTO now has more than 150 member provinces. The difference between GATT and the WTO is that the former was based on a set of regulations that governed its signers meanwhile the latter is an establishment ( Fergusson, 2008 ) . The WTO does non restrict its activities to the trading of goods and services. It besides covers rational belongings rights issues. The chief end of the WTO is to advance the liberalization of international trade by advancing free and just trade policies and extinguishing the barriers imposed on trade through protectionism. In other words, the WTO ‘s mission is to open up markets and advance just competition between all the member provinces ( Steinberg, 2002 ) . The WTO is working hard to modulate trade within member states. Within this context, the administration has formulated an efficient model which guides the preparation and dialogue of trade policies between states. It besides has a disciplinary organic structure that helps to decide differences within merchandising spouses to guarantee that all signers adhere to the footings and status of the WTO understanding ( Steinberg, 2002 ) . The end of this organic structure is to guarantee that states adhere to the footings and conditions. Without such a organic structure, the administration would merely stay a toothless bull Canis familiaris.

One of the major challenges of the WTO is the prostration of the 2001 Doha round which was aimed at guaranting that poorer states, which constitute the bulk of the universe ‘s population have just engagement ( Fergusson, 2008 ) . During this unit of ammunition, a major difference emerged between some of the developed economic systems that export agricultural merchandises and hapless states that most of their population relies on subsistence agriculture ( Fergusson, 2008 ) . The poorer states want to be able to do certain that their hapless husbandmans are protected from the inflow of inexpensive agricultural exports from the industrialized states. This is because most of these industrialized states are able to export inexpensive merchandises as a consequence of the fact that their husbandmans receive immense subsidies from their authoritiess ( Steinberg, 2002 ) . Such subsidies lead to unjust competition with husbandmans in poorer states. These hapless states open up their markets, but they can non tap into the market of developed states.


It is said that political relations make unusual bedfellows but the combination of economic sciences and globalization introduces a wholly different motion. This helps to explicate why Europe and the USA are stand outing today. These parts do everything within their powers to protect their local economic systems and occupations ; meanwhile they continue to research bing chances abroad. And this is chiefly done through export and domestic subsidies in across the European Union. This makes it in such a manner that developing states in Africa and Asia are forced to open up their markets meanwhile Europeans continue to transport their merchandises to these abroad market. This is an unjust trade pattern which the European Union is unwilling to give up ( Khor, 2005 ) . Since the authoritiess of these states are non every bit rich as those of the EU member provinces, they are unable to offer their ain husbandmans subsidies. The merchandises exported by European husbandmans to Africa are made cheaper by the subsidies and now sell cheaper than locally produced agricultural merchandises in Africa and Asia ( Khor, 2005 ) . Until the EU uplifts these subsidies, African and Asiatic markets will go on to see the dumping of unnaturally cheaper goods from Europe. These authoritiess would prefer to indulge in the pattern of dumping instead than go ill-famed for cutting subsidies that have existed for decennaries in a move that hazard doing unemployment.

It is of import to observe that economic globalization is traveling at a slower gait as a consequence of Europe ‘s protectionist economic policies. Protectionism came along with the birth of autonomous provinces in Europe. Europe foremost witnessed the growing of crowned head states which worked difficult to stand out as the best in footings of economic, political, societal and cultural positions. There has been a general talk about the demand to switch from protectionism to globalization when it comes to international trade. However, much of this has ended in theory without any thing being done in pattern to supplement the statements. In France and many other states, the authoritiess make much committednesss and promises about the demand to globalize the universe ‘s economic system ( Khor, 2005 ) . At the terminal of the twenty-four hours, what largely happens is all speaking. Mainstream political parties in France favour freer trade. On the other manus, radical political parties support protectionism. This is because most of them concentrate their heads within the state and neglect to see that the economic system can non be operated in isolation from the remainder of the universe. It is sad to larn that today, the trade argument in France has moved off from the argument over free trade and protectionism ( Khor, 2005 ) . It is all about victims of free trade and particular involvement motions on the other. Most particular involvement motions have come to larn that France can non insulate its ego from the economic globalization procedure.

Meanwhile Europe claims to be in favor of a free economic system, which is merely in theory. In world, European authoritiess are making all what they can to protect their economic systems from abroad competition. In the agricultural industry, for case, authoritiess are cognizant that husbandmans in developing states enjoy the benefits of lower cost of production ( Sicilia & A ; Cruikshank, 2000 ) . This makes it possible for many of them to sell their exports their green goods to Europe and do immense net incomes. At the same clip, authoritiess in Europe know that these husbandmans would do it hard for local husbandmans to sell. Alternatively of utilizing instruments such as quotas or ordinances to forestall farm imports from fluxing into the state, these authoritiess prefer to offer subsidies to local husbandmans doing it possible for them to vie with their foreign rivals ( Sicilia & A ; Cruikshank, 2000 ) . Governments have seized doing usage of quotas and duties because they know other states can besides revenge.

WTO trade dialogues: the Doha Development Agenda

The Doha WTO negotiations that held in Qatar in November 2001 marked a controversial episode in the history of the WTO. To get down with, this trade unit of ammunition was expected to brood on the demands of developing states when it comes to international trade. It was expected to assist poorer states to accomplish sustainable development through trade and non assistance. Unfortunately, the negotiations collapsed because developed states were unwilling to give up some grants ( European Union, 2011 ) . The end of the dialogues was to reform agricultural policies in developed states and reviews the policy of farm subsidies that European authoritiess offer to their husbandmans. Developed states were expected to besides open up their markets for husbandmans from developing states by cutting back on these subsidies. Unfortunately, delegates of these states came under force per unit area from husbandmans back place who want to go on having subsidies which gives them an unjust advantage over their opposite numbers in developing states ( European Union, 2011 ) . Subsidies constitute an unjust trade policy when the sums offered to husbandmans go excessively much. This is because it has the same consequence as dumping even though it is a different construct. Subsidies destabilise monetary values in the economic systems to which subsidized European husbandmans export their agricultural merchandises to.

Harmonizing to the European Union ( 2011 ) the universe stands to profit more if the Doha Round is implemented. A trade papers published by the EU in January 2011 notes that, “ The Doha Development Agenda ( DDA ) would hold positive effects on the universe economic system: A successful and comprehensive DDA would add a‚¬135 billion ( $ 167bn ) to planetary end product on an one-year footing after the full execution period ( 2026 ) . This means an addition of 0.24 % in universe GDP. World exports would increase by a‚¬310 billion ( $ 383bn ) on an one-year footing. This equals a 2.56 % addition. Even in the first twelvemonth of execution, duties will get down to come down across the board, and by the 5th twelvemonth half of the Doha additions will hold been reaped. – If there is a top up negotiated for industrial goods and services, these GDP additions would increase, harmonizing to one survey, to merely under $ 300bn per twelvemonth. ”

The 8th unit of ammunition of planetary trade negotiations was organised in Uruguay. It was organised within the model of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade ( GATT ) . It is during this unit of ammunition that the GATT was transformed into the WTO. The Uruguay unit of ammunition focused on agricultural trade issues ( Kay & A ; Ackrill, 2009 ) . Its chief ends included the riddance of subsidies, put limitations on foreign investing, and to open trade in services like banking and insurance every bit good as set the model to develop trade ordinances in the country of rational belongings rights. The unit of ammunition was criticised for non paying sufficient attending to decide the jobs often raised by developing states when it comes to planetary trade ( Kay & A ; Ackrill, 2009 ) . After the unit of ammunition, critics besides accused the developed states of utilizing their fiscal and trade powers to handle developing states below the belt particularly when it comes to agricultural trade. This paved the manner for the creative activity of the WTO.

Common Agricultural Policy ( CAP ) :

The Common Agricultural Policy ( CAP ) foremost appeared when the EC was created following the 1957 pact of Rome. Prior to 1957, the assorted European states had been supplying different signifiers of support to the agricultural industry ( Palmer et Al, 2006 ) . The CAP merely came along to harmonize the types of aid that was given to the agricultural sector by the assorted authoritiess of the so European Community member provinces. The chief aim of CAP from its origin has been to subsidise agricultural husbandmans ( Khor, 2005 ) . However, the construction of the programme has experienced major reforms over the old ages. In the early old ages of the programme, it chiefly consisted of subsidies paid to the husbandmans per unit of the merchandise sold. Unfortunately, this led to a batch of inefficiency and hapless end product as a consequence of the fact many husbandmans knew they would acquire a per centum of the merchandise sold ( Palmer et Al, 2006 ) . This has changed today as subsidies largely lead to better end product since they come in as income subsidies and enable husbandmans cultivate big parts of land that they would non be able to cultivate if left on their ain. This has brought about higher output and lower nutrient monetary values. This is because husbandmans benefit from economic systems of graduated table when they cultivate larger parts of land. CAP is a major beginning of authorities outgo in the EU. It is of import to observe that CAP costs every bit much as 40 % of the budget of the European Union ( Palmer et Al, 2006 ) . However, most of the authoritiess in within the EU believe that that CAP is assisting to accomplish the undermentioned ends:

-Better productiveness due to technological betterments.

-Guarantees a good criterion of life for most husbandmans.

-Food security

-Stabilising the market monetary values

-Helps maintain low-cost nutrient monetary values ( Brander & A ; Krugman, 1983 )

Looking at the above mentioned goals/advantages of CAP, it is easy to state that it would take rather a long piece for Europe to acquire rid of protectionism. For the mere fact that the part spends about 40 % of its budget on subsidies, it is easy to mensurate how much this pattern has eaten deep into the cloths of the EU society. Based on this statement, it is accurate to province that that the terminal of CAP and protectionism is non in sight.

The Global Trading System

The WTO is at that place to modulate trade and design a model for trade policies that would assist open up markets and promote just trade between states. However, the WTO can non vouch the result of its policies. This is because we live in an evolving economic environment where it is hard to accurately foretell economic results. The planetary trading system is governed by the undermentioned five common rules ( 2011, WTO ) . These are the same rules that governed both GATT and the WTO today.

a. ) Non-discrimination: Trade liberalization implies that there should be no favoritism between states. There are two constructs under non-discrimination: the most favoured state and the national intervention rule. These two constituents are included in the WTO ‘s rules that govern the trade of goods, services and belongings rights. Harmonizing to the most favoured state regulation, there must be no signifier of favoritism between two WTO member states. Each member state must offer the same intervention to all WTO member states. In the yesteryear, it was common to see states taking which states to merchandise with. For illustration, the UK could take to merchandise merely with EU member states and discriminate against Brazil. This is non permitted under the WTO trade regulations. The national intervention rule holds that imported goods must have the same intervention as locally produced goods. The end of this ordinance has been to guarantee that foreign goods are non discriminated against one time they enter the local markets. In the yesteryear, and even today, some states use non-tariff barriers to know apart against goods imported from abroad. Such favoritisms include safety steps and proficient criterions to advert merely those.

B. ) Reciprocality Policy: The purpose of this policy to cut down the degree to which states can advance the prejudiced policy of most favoured state. This intended to open markets in the sense that each state has to open up its markets while seeking to tap into other markets. The WTO condemns the pattern of seeking to acquire into other markets without opening up your ain market. Reciprocal grants means that both trade spouses stand to hold about the same degrees of benefits by merchandising with each other. It makes no sense to come in into a trade understanding where one party would hold ninety per centum of the benefits that arise from the trading dealingss. In this light hence, before a state enters into bilateral trade dialogues, it is of import for that state to do certain that the addition from the trade is greater than the addition that can obtained from one-sided trade. The major end of this policy is to guarantee that additions would happen for both parties.

c. ) Adhering Agreements: The duty committednesss signed by WTO member states have to be adhering. This is because non-binding understandings are most frequently down played by signers. And if this has to go on, so the WTO would ne’er run into its end of guaranting that there is free trade around the universe. Duties have placed immense barriers in international trade over the last several decennaries. One of the first steps that the WTO took in order to halt protectionism was to grate off trade duties. Many states took committednesss to grate of these duties. Accepting to scraping of duties is non plenty. What is most of import is to guarantee that these states enter into adhering understandings with their trade spouses.

d. ) Transparency: In order to avoid doubtful and unscrupulous trade patterns, the WTO expects member states to print their trade ordinances. Member states are besides expected to let WTO inspectors to do regular cheques in their states to guarantee that what they publish is really what they implement. Failure to make so would take to a state of affairs where members would subscribe ordinances that they would non implement. These states are besides expected to continuously update the WTO on alterations in trade policies. The WTO ‘s Trade Policy Review Mechanism ( TPRM ) besides publishes periodic studies on the province of trade ordinances and processs in member provinces in order to guarantee that the planetary community is kept abreast with developments happening in the industry.

e. ) Safety Rules: Under peculiar fortunes, it is right for authoritiess to curtail trade. This is because the fact that a state has signed WTO conventions does non intend it should non protect the wellness and safety of its citizens. When there are safety concerns, states can implement trade limitations to protect their citizens. When there is bird grippe or pes and oral cavity disease in Germany, it is incorrect for the UK to let import of meat and birds from Germany as a consequence of safety concerns. This is because such merchandises would set the lives of British occupants at hazard. Trade limitations can be introduced to accomplish non economic ends. For illustration, the British and EU trade stoppages on Zimbabwe are aimed at seting the state under force per unit area so as to acquire it to reexamine its political relations. Trade limitations are besides allowed when they are carried out in revenge to unjust trade policies.

Multilateralism, Globalisation to Protectionism

Many economic systems around the universe are working hard to accomplish multilateralism via WTO rank and other independent attempts. Regionalism and sub-regionalism is one of the ways through which states can accomplish multilateralism ( Schlumberger, 2008 ) . This is because by inscribing in regional and sub regional economic blocks, states automatically derive entree to the markets of all the member states that make up the economic block ( Schlumberger, 2008 ) . In add-on to regional and sub regional economic associations, WTO helps to advance multilateralism on a wider forepart. The EU trade policy is clearly spelt out in article 31 of the European Community ( EC ) pact. The article lists the ends of the common trade policy adopted by the states that made up the so European Community at the pact was signed. The common end of the EU trade policy as defined by the article is to lend to the development of universe trade and the abolishment of the limitations on international trade. The article goes on to province that the EU trade policy would be to take down imposts responsibilities so as to advance the free flow of goods between states ( Schlumberger, 2008 ) . At the clip the article was written, it was widely expected that such free flow of goods between states would take to more competition and better end product. Very few people, if any, could anticipate at the clip that economic involvements would turn over the article. The pact was touted for its good purposes to advance trade and sustainable development non merely within the European Community, but besides with the remainder of the universe. Unfortunately, the pact turned out to be a theory as in pattern, Europe continued to see a high degree of trade barriers.

Irrespective of the fact that globalization is taking the universe by storm, it is sad to larn that protectionism has remained around several old ages after the Doha trade negotiations ( Donner, 2005 ) . European Union member states are loath when it comes to to the full opening up their markets for foreign histrions to export their goods and services. This is really seeable within the agricultural industry where husbandmans receive subsidies to do them more competitory than hapless husbandmans in other developing states.

One of the early ends of European integrating was to advance free and just trade within the EU and between the EU and the remainder of the universe ( Neep, 2004 ) . The purposes were good at the clip. This is because in the free market economic theory, the universe ‘s economic system would be best if we can witness a free economic system where there are no trade barriers ( Palmer et Al, 2006 ) . The advantages of such a truly ‘global economic system ‘ is that it would take to higher competition and optimal end product. However, it is of import to acknowledge that this could merely be in theory and non in pattern ( Hills, 2007 ) . The ground why it is hard to hold such a absolutely broad economic system is that there are many non economic factors that determine the economic policies ( Neep, 2004 ) . These include the political relations and policies of a state. When a leader finds out that opening up the local market would set local husbandmans out of concern and lead to unemployment, he becomes faced with a quandary. He has to take between protecting occupations for local occupants who would vote in approaching elections and run intoing up with international trade committednesss ( Neep, 2004 ) . For the most portion, it is the former that prevails. This helps to explicate why the Doha negotiations prostration.

The EU is a large participant when it comes to planetary trade. In fact, the EU is the universe strongest merchandising power today ( Palmer et Al, 2006 ) . The EU has bilateral trade understandings with many merchandising spouses across the Earth today. These bilateral understandings are largely designed with the model of wider many-sided trade understandings drafted and signed by the EU and planetary trade establishments and other regional economic axis.

EU trade: the large participants

Trade spouse

Imports into the EU

( billion euro )

Exports from the EU

( billion euro )

Percentage of entire trade

( importsA

+A exports )

EU planetary trade




1. United States




2. The 10 states that joined the EU in 2004




3. Switzerland




4. China




5. Japan




6 African, Caribbean and Pacific states ( ACP )




7. Russia




8. Norge




Figures for 2002, trade in goods.

Beginning: Eurostat.

Protectionism & A ; The paradox of voluntary duties:

The EU continues to implement protectionist policies amid widespread calls for economic liberalisation. The ground why the Europium has continued to keep its policy is chiefly political. Most of these authoritiess are under force per unit area from the husbandmans who want to remain in concern and procure their occupations ( Woodgate, 2006 ) . For this ground, it is hard for the authoritiess to wholly eliminate protectionist policies such as subsidies, import duties every bit good as quotas. Most of these authoritiess know that they would lose the ballot of husbandmans who constitute a sensible cabal of eligible electors ( Woodgate, 2006 ) . In order to remain in power and be re-elected into office during approaching elections, many of these authoritiess are faced with a quandary on whether to protect globalization or local husbandmans. Most of the clip, these authoritiess decide to protect the husbandmans to guarantee that they do non lose their ballots during elections. They go against international trade conventions in order to do certain they achieve their political motivations.

One of the economic grounds why the Europium was created was to ease trade within member provinces. This in itself is a good class for the fact that it encourages regional trade. Unfortunately, the EU continues to advance protectionism ( Khor, 2005 ) . European integrating has been touted by most EU member states and other smaller states in the fringe of Western Europe have continued to show their want to fall in the EU. However, some critics of some of these states, such as Bulgaria were speedy to knock when it foremost expressed its connotation to fall in the EU ( Grier, 2010 ) . One of the grounds advanced by critics at the clip was that if Bulgaria joined the EU, it would hold to give up some of the rights and autonomies enjoyed by leaders of autonomous provinces. One thing is clear ; most European Union member provinces have had to give up one or two of their crowned head rights. This is because there are EU criterions that these states need to run into up with such as the European criterions of democracy, environmental pollution, trade unionism and human rights criterions ( Grier, 2010 ) . In this regard, fall ining the EU means giving up some of the rights to run these issues the manner single states would hold preferred to run them. At the same clip, there are no tough countenances dished out to member provinces that defy one or some of these Torahs ( Grier, 2010 ) . Some of the voluntary duties that bind EU member provinces are aimed at doing them better states when it comes to upholding moral values such as contending to control corruptness in some member states of the EU. However, these duties largely have to make with human rights and democracy concerns. They fail to turn to the issue of protectionism. As such, it is accurate to province here that Europe is decelerating down the gait of economic globalization by making the free trade country within the EU and know aparting against non- EU member states when it comes to the agricultural industry.

The Advantages of European regional integrating

European Integration has led to increased protectionism meanwhile it favours trade within the EU. Trade barriers between the EU member provinces have been torn down. On the other manus, EU member states have upgraded the degree of limitations on foreign goods fluxing into the part via subsidies. Since most of the EU member provinces use the Euro, this has facilitated trade amongst them. This research confirms the hypothesis of this survey which states protectionism is decelerating down the procedure of globalisation. EU protectionism is cut downing the volume of trade between the EU and other parts out of the EU.

European Integration Favours Trade within The EU Member States & A ; Protectionism:

European integrating as we know it today is a procedure that began long ago and evolved from one phase to another. European integrating was motivated by the fact that member states understood that integrating would come along with tremendous economic benefits. Trade liberalization within Europe began with the European Free Trade Area, which subsequently progressed to the imposts brotherhood, common market and today the economic brotherhood. The creative activity of the EU, Euro and Schengen zones have all led to immense economic advantages for the member provinces ( Halliday, 2007 ) . To get down with, the Schengen zone has facilitated both the transit of goods and people across the European Union. Prior to its creative activity, motion was made complex as a consequence of the fact that people needed visas to travel from one state to the following ( Halliday, 2007 ) . Besides the visas, there was strong control of goods traveling from one state into another with immense imposts and excise responsibilities. All these have changed and makers have a larger market to sell their merchandises ( Karamva, 2005 ) . This has brought about the advantages of economic systems of graduated table and created more occupation chances as many companies now operate across a larger geographical part. However, it is of import to observe that most of these benefits are largely enjoyed by the EU member states. This is because when it comes to some sectors such as the agricultural industry, the EU has shut down its markets to foreign competition from developing states through subsidies. Subsidies have made it possible for European husbandmans to see a comparatively lower cost of production irrespective of the fact that the cost of labor is several times more expensive than in the remainder of the universe.

After political integrating was achieved, Europe began looking past the political advantages of integrating. Alternatively, the continent began developing a strong economic bond with member states. At the terminal of it all, Europe is cognizant of the fact that it can non stay an Island within a extremely ‘globalised ‘ economic environment. It has been forced to construct strong ties with other merchandising spouses from abroad. However, when of all time Europe finds that its involvements would be threatened, it has to make some thing to protect local involvement. This explains why Europe has adopted a figure of protectionist policies aimed at guaranting that its husbandmans remain in concern.

The advantages of European integrating are tremendous and seeable on about all aspects of life. To get down off with, one of the most touted benefits of European integrating has to make with the economic deductions. British spends presently spend up to $ 3 billion in purchasing and selling foreign currency in order to transport out trade with the EU ( Neep, 2004 ) . Euro zone member provinces do non hold to travel through such fusss and outgo. This goes on to better profitableness for local EU concerns that trade with other concerns within other EU member provinces ( Neep, 2004 ) . Prior to the debut of the Euro, concerns used to pass immense amounts of money on currency exchange and cost of reassigning money from one European state within the Euro zone to another ( Cesari, 2004 ) . This explains the of import function of free trade

Still on the economic forepart, families and houses within the Euro zone benefit from transparence in monetary values since they do non hold to cover with exchange rates each clip they compare goods from any part within the Euro zone. Price transparence encourages trade within the euro zone ( Palmer et Al, 2006 ) . This leads to efficiency and competition since makers become more cognizant that consumers now have entree to recognition cards and can rapidly put order for goods from anyplace across the euro zone.

A individual currency in a individual market makes much sense non merely for consumers but for investors every bit good ( Woodgate, 2006 ) . Investors do non hold to worry about how much they will take back place at the terminal of the twelvemonth when they invest within the euro members provinces. This is because puting in different currency markets is sometimes hazardous as a immense ball of net incomes is sometimes swallowed up unfavorable currency fluctuations ( Palmer et Al, 2006 ) . European integrating has hence helped to extinguish some of the concerns brought approximately by currency exchange and makes it easier for concerns to run across national boundaries. It is merely so sensible to hold a individual currency for a large geographical market such as the 1 that exists in the Euro zone that includes about 20 three states ( Cesari, 2004 ) . Most of these states feature amongst the universe ‘s strongest economic systems ( Palmer et Al, 2006 ) .


In decision, protectionism is rife in Europe. It is upseting to see how much resources European authorities are puting in supplying husbandman subsidies, most of which is geared towards forestalling new histrions from come ining into the market. Alternatively, authorities would prefer to subsidize husbandmans to the degree where they have to get down making dumping in order merely to maintain them employed. In Europe, one of the first tools through which authoritiess are evaluated is the degree of employment. It is difficult to happen a European authorities that can take the hazard of cutting subsidies sing the fact that it would take to unemployment. For this ground, up to 40 % of European budget is invested into farm subsidies. The advantages of subsidizing husbandmans are tremendous. No authorities is willing to take the hazard of extinguishing these subsidies. In this visible radiation, the hypothesis for this survey can be confirmed. European authoritiess are decelerating down the gait of trade and globalization all in order to run into up with their internal political challenges. If these authoritiess change class, they risk being voted out of office given the fact that the agricultural sector is a major employer in most of these states. In order to keep nutrient security and better productiveness, these authoritiess have remained inexorable to the Doha trade negotiations. They use the least chance to curtail trade. Such chances include the visual aspect of an agricultural disease that affects either workss or animate beings ( Khor, 2005 ) .

EU has come under increasing unfavorable judgment for its unjust trade policies. During G8 acmes, it is common to see dissenters fighting to do their voices heard. Most of these dissenters are out to advance just trade between Europe and the underdeveloped universe. One of the major challenges of the WTO is the prostration of the 2001 Doha round which was aimed at guaranting that poorer states, which constitute the bulk of the universe ‘s population have just engagement. Meanwhile Europe claims to be in favor of a free economic system, which is merely in theory. In world, European authoritiess are making all what they can to protect their economic systems from abroad competition. In the agricultural industry, for case, authoritiess are cognizant that husbandmans in developing states enjoy the benefits of lower cost of production. Trade liberalization implies that there should be no favoritism between states. There are two constructs under non-discrimination: the most favoured state and the national intervention rule. These two constituents are included in the WTO ‘s rules that govern the trade of goods, services and belongings rights. Harmonizing to the most favoured state regulation, there must be no signifier of favoritism between two WTO member states. Each member state must offer the same intervention to all WTO member states. Many economic systems around the universe are working hard to accomplish multilateralism via WTO rank and other independent attempts. Regionalism and sub-regionalism is one of the ways through which states can accomplish multilateralism. This is because by inscribing in regional and sub regional economic blocks, states automatically derive entree to the markets of all the member states that make up the economic block. The ground why the Europium has continued to keep its policy is chiefly political. Most of these authoritiess are under force per unit area from the husbandmans who want to remain in concern and procure their occupations. For this ground, it is hard for the authoritiess to wholly eliminate protectionist policies such as subsidies, import duties every bit good as quotas.

Unfortunately, the chief ground why protectionism would non halt any clip shortly is that most European states have chosen to follow non-tariff policies. These include wellness and safety concerns to curtail trade with other states. When European markets notice the presence of bird grippe in Asia, they instantly impose trade limitations mentioning wellness concerns. But when these diseases stop, these states continue to keep on to these limitations for a really long clip. They pretend to be detecting in an attempt to guarantee that contaminated merchandises do non come in the state. But in world, these states take advantage of the chance to close down their markets for some clip, giving room for local husbandmans to sell without holding to confront competition from abroad.