Poverty can be defined in many different ways. In certain efforts. it can be used in Numberss. while other definitions can be more obscure. and used to specify a life manner. The defined term of poorness is “the province of one who lacks a usual or socially acceptable sum of money or stuff possessions” . ( Mirriam Webster. 2011 ) Harmonizing to the U. S. Census Bureau. more than 37 million people live below the poorness line. “The ranks of America’s hapless swelled to about 1 in 6 people last twelvemonth. making a new high as long-run unemployment left 1000000s of Americans fighting and out of work. The figure of uninsured edged up to 49. 9 million. the biggest in more than two decennaries. ” ( Yen. 2011 ) Poverty is evidently really common in our state. and all over the universe. Even with the United States being the wealthiest state in the universe. we still have many Americans who struggle mundane to last. The subject I chose to concentrate on is the high cost of poorness. and how it really costs more to be hapless. Although it seems like an oxymoron. it is a really realistic subject.

I chose this subject because I have personally been involved in both sides of economic positions. Although I do non populate in utmost poorness. I technically have an income that falls within the line of poorness. but I do non hold a household to support and have pupil loans to populate off of. I wanted to cognize farther item of how those who merely experience poorness. have limited picks. and how their disadvantages really cost them more money. My personal life experience is one from an upper center category household. and was raised in a affluent suburb in a predominately white community. My household ne’er had fiscal battles. so I had no experience with combating measures. I worked in high school and had my ain money. but I had nil to pay for. I thought I made a nice sum of money doing $ 7 an hr. and merely working 15-20 hours a hebdomad. For a individual with no measures or rents to pay for. $ 150-200 a hebdomad was a batch to me.

Recently. I moved out of my parent’s suburban place and into the metropolis to be closer to school and derive some independency as an grownup. I make about $ 250-400 a hebdomad. depending on the activity of the eating house I waitress at. I shortly realized that I am really dependent on my two roomies to divide measures and rent. because I could ne’er afford to populate on my ain. Although we live in a low income vicinity. the cost of nutrient. rent. electric. heat and overseas telegram measures stack up. and I struggle to pay them. I besides merely pay one tierce of the full cost. I have a auto I need to set gas in. a gym rank I pay monthly and recognition card measures every month. I now see how people that make merely every bit much. or less than I do. fight even more to do terminals run into when their income is at the caput of the family.

I wanted to demo to people that it is more expensive to be hapless. because of the deficiency of resources. income and recognition. and besides what their options become for survival due to these fortunes. I besides did a quantitative survey on leasing versus having an point. to demo that it really costs more to lease something than to buy it upfront. I chose to try the same three points from two different shops. and entering the monetary values to see the differences of leasing and having it. I am cognizant that most persons in poorness. normally do non hold adequate money to buy points or places upfront so they frequently rent them. believing they can afford hebdomadal or monthly payments to stretch out their income to afford other life necessities.

My first construct I chose to concentrate was entree to nutrient. I thought about how much I spend on the nutrient I enjoy for merely for me personally. and I think it is expensive. I enjoy fruits and fresh veggies. trade name name cereals and expensive staff of lifes. Since I grew up eating the certain trade names. I continue to seek and afford the things I like. Bing an person with a low income. I can non conceive of back uping non merely myself. but a household entirely on my income. In this research paper. I will explicate the adversities of acquiring to and from the food market shop. and if you can non. you need to shop elsewhere. such as corner shops. ” Prices in urban corner shops are about ever higher. economic experts say.

And sometimes. monetary values in supermarkets in poorer vicinities are higher. Many of these shops charge more because the cost of making concern in some vicinities is higher. ” [ ( Brown. 2009 ) ] This can take to passing excess clip. danger. emphasis. and in the terminal. bing the person more money. It besides forces those with less money to pass. higher hazard for fleshiness. “Inequitable entree to healthy nutrients is one mechanism by which socioeconomic factors influence the diet and wellness of a population” . ( Drewnowski. 2009 ) Since they do non hold the money to afford healthy picks. they must take nutrients that they can stretch out in order to feed their households. even if it is non healthy.

My following construct I chose to analyze was the monetary value of minimal pay. and how it isn’t truly the minimal coverage of standard life. In New York State. the minimal pay is $ 7. 25. “About 20 % of American grownups who have occupations are gaining less than $ 10. 65 an hr. Even at 40 hours a hebdomad. that amounts to less than $ 22. 314. which is the poorness degree for a household of four” . [ ( Isidore. 2011 ) ] . This merely states that a monthly income of approximately $ 1. 000- $ 2. 000 is about impossible to last on. This may take to bad recognition. forced into leasing. and holding people do unsafe or condemnable activity to acquire money or points for their households.

The poorness rate for all people disguises significant fluctuation between racial and cultural subgroups. Poverty rates for inkinesss and Hispanics greatly exceed the national norm. Harmonizing to the United States Census Bureau. “In 2010. 27. 4 per centum of inkinesss and 26. 6 per centum of Hispanics were hapless. compared to 9. 9 per centum of non-Hispanic Whites and 12. 1 per centum of Asians. ” ( Bureau of the Census. 2011 ) Poverty rates are most frequently the highest for households headed by individual adult females. peculiarly if they are black or Latino. “In 2010. 31. 6 per centum of families headed by individual adult females were hapless. while 15. 8 per centum of families headed by individual work forces and 6. 2 per centum of married-couple families lived in poorness. ” ( Bureau of the Census. 2011 ) . “The official poorness degree is an one-year income of $ 22. 314 for a household of four “ . ( Yen. 2011 )

On norm. depending on the size of a family. a household life in poorness has an mean income of less than $ 20. 000. This can include twosomes with kids. individual parents with one or more kids. Acerate leaf to state. this is non a batch of money to back up a household on. and therefore they have to take excess stairss to last. which consequences in higher costs. and lending to the statement of the high cost of poorness. You have to be rich to be hapless. This is what some people. who have ne’er lived below the poorness line. don’t understand. The poorer you are. the more things cost. Extra stairss in money. clip. fuss. exhaustion. and danger. This is a fact of life that telecasting. magazines and media. do non frequently explain. Take for illustration. nutrient. First. if you do non hold a auto. acquiring to the supermarket can take anyplace from one to three hours of public transit. and bing a monetary value to utilize the coach or a cab. To utilize the method of public transit. it is necessary to hold to lade all of your food markets into the coach. or cab.

This is restricting to infinite and capableness of transporting all of the food markets. A simpler version of this would be to walk to the corner shop. for free. but where the food market choice is limited and monetary values are doubled. “Prices in urban corner shops are about ever higher. economic experts say. And sometimes. monetary values in supermarkets in poorer vicinities are higher. Many of these shops charge more because the cost of making concern in some vicinities is higher. ” ( Brown. 2009 ) Besides. if you are populating in poorness. you will most likely non be doing adequate money to purchase $ 100 or more worth of food markets for your household. This consequences in the individual or household disbursement more money. to either acquire to the food market shop. or paying more for the nutrient to salvage money going to and from. In the terminal. it is a losing state of affairs. and the hapless are paying more in the terminal than person who is affluent and has entree to the necessary resources.

Spending more money than in-between category. or affluent category to purchase food markets is one illustration of how high the cost of poorness is. If the hapless is passing money in the corner shops. they are most likely non acquiring alimentary nutrients or healthy picks that most corner shops do non transport. Obesity is a direct consequence from that. seeing that unhealthy nutrients cost manner less than healthy feeding does. ” Obesity and type 2 diabetes follow a socioeconomic gradient. Highest rates are observed among groups with the lowest degrees of instruction and income and in the most disadvantaged countries. Inequitable entree to healthy nutrients is one mechanism by which socioeconomic factors influence the diet and wellness of a population” . ( Drewnowski. 2009 ) Low income degrees leave people no pick but to take nutrients that are alimentary hapless. because it is a monetary value that can afford and something they can stretch out among their whole household to feed them. It is besides the best manner to supply day-to-day Calories at an low-cost cost.

Those who are fighting financially are clearly the most deprived when it comes to healthy eating wonts. In our food market shops today we have so many unreal sweetenings. preservatives. fats and Sweets that are certain to savor good. but non good for our wellness. Fats and Sweets tend to be manner less. where as healthy nutrients cost more. It makes no sense to hold unhealthy nutrients cost less than healthy nutrients. but it is the fabrication and production that determines the cost of nutrients. Therefore. those who do non hold the money to buy healthy options have to take nutrients that fit in their budget. These are normally unhealthy. packaged. canned or frozen options that have little to no nutritionary value.

Even those households that have authorities support. public assistance cheques and nutrient casts are still on a restricted budget. The nutrients they are allowed to acquire for free or decreased monetary value are points such as fruit juices. canned fruits. cereal. grits. and maize tortillas. These points are all packed with sugar and Calories which is non helping in healthy life styles. “Researchers have shown that low-income vicinities pull more fast-food mercantile establishments and convenience shops as opposed to full-service supermarkets and food market stores” ( Drewnowski. 2009 ) . This besides relates back to travel costs. transit and affording nutrient. Since it is easier to acquire to the corner shops. it is a disadvantage to the clients because the corner shops are normally merely packed with unhealthy options. It is economic want that is a cardinal factor in fleshiness. and one cardinal factor of weight addition may be low diet cost.

Another illustration of how the high cost of poorness is. is the monetary value of minimal pay and if it truly acceptable to be the minimal pay you can last on. Most people and experts agree that to acquire out of an economic slack. we need more occupations. But another job is that 1000000s of Americans already have occupations that don’t pay really much. “About 20 % of American grownups who have occupations are gaining less than $ 10. 65 an hr. Even at 40 hours a hebdomad. that amounts to less than $ 22. 314. which is the poorness degree for a household of four” . ( Isidore. 2011 ) In New York State. the federal lower limit pay is $ 7. 25. Minimal pay is supposed to be the pay in which it is the bare minimal sum of money that one can last on. Even at 40 hours a hebdomad. that equals to be $ 290 without revenue enhancements taken out.

This would be a payroll check of about $ 250 for one hebdomad. and this peers about $ 1000 a month. Taking into consideration that those who are the on the job hapless. they need to pass more money acquiring to and from work. which besides costs excess clip. They besides need to pay measures. feed themselves and their households. For an single doing $ 1. 000 a month. this is about impossible to last on even in minimum conditions. An mean cost of rent in Buffalo NY is reasonably cheap. and taking into consideration that Buffalo on of the poorest metropoliss in the United States. we have to be cognizant that there is many people in the metropolis below the poorness line. Harmonizing to Rentjungle. com. An mean one sleeping room flat in Buffalo is $ 679 a month and two sleeping room flat rents mean $ 750. To see this in comparing to another big metropolis. one sleeping room flats in New York City rent for $ 2356 a month on norm and two sleeping room flat rents mean $ 2767.

Minimal pay is clearly non plenty to last on if your mean monthly income is $ 1000. Out of $ 1000 income. you have to put aside an norm of $ 600 for rent. go forthing you $ 400 for auto fees. if you have one. or transit fees if you depend on them. If your flat does non include public-service corporations. you need money for electric measure. gas measures. which can skyrocket in our country when it is winter. overseas telegram or cyberspace if possible. and nutrient budget. Another illustration of a disadvantage the hapless have is the existent procedure of cashing their cheque to acquire their money. The rich or in-between category normally have the option of direct sedimentation for their payroll checks.

The hapless have check-cashing and payday loan articulations. which cost clip and money. The hapless wage more for fiscal services. and many people who can non be capable to hold a bank history may hold to pay excess money for a money order to pay their measures and hard currency their cheques. “They may pay a 2 per centum check-cashing fee because they don’t have bank services. ” ( Brown. 2009 ) Many people in poorness literally unrecorded payroll check to paycheck. If they have a measure that’s due. they do non hold a luxury of on-line payments. because they can non afford computing machines or cyberspace. so they have to get off it. If they do non hold the money in clip for a measure. they have to wait for their following payroll check.

This can be late fees. and in an terminal consequence. disbursement more money than a individual with those luxuries. While many people are lasting in this mode. people will look for any manner to acquire by without passing their money. Many people in poorness may depend on recognition cards to assist them afford things they can non. Recognition cards can assist out for impermanent grounds. but if non paid off. this can do more jobs. Peoples who are fighting to pay their measures will most probably have bad recognition. and have no other option but to lease places. points. and many other things they can non afford. due to their recognition and income. Bad recognition besides costs more money than those with good recognition. If a individual does non hold adequate money to pay off measures in full. they will acquire excess involvement charges and fees that stack up and stop up bing more for them.

Since I did non hold the option of traveling into places of the people in poorness. I decided to make research on points. instead than places. to compare the costs of rent to have. Poor people do non hold the option of having places. because of their recognition and/or income. so they have no pick but to lease. I wanted to see if the monetary value you pay for being a low income single really costs you more. than to ain something. This is to demo that poorness does in fact cost more to populate I chose to look at a icebox. a scope and a telecasting from two different section shops to compare monetary values on a rent versus having the point. My first point. the icebox. a 25. 3 three-dimensional pes. Side-by-Side with thru-the Door Ice and Water. Black colour. was $ 799. 99 to have instantly from Best Buy.

At Rent- A-Center. the same exact icebox was $ 37. 99 to lease per hebdomad. for 91 hebdomads. At first. it seems like a inexpensive trade and a realistic monetary value for those who do non hold the $ 799. 99 upfront to pass. When you do the math. $ 37. 99 per hebdomad for 91 hebdomads is $ 3457 sum to have after leasing at the $ 37. 99 per hebdomad. This is over four times the monetary value it would be to purchase at Best Buy and ain instantly. I besides learned that consumers can acquire a “discounted” monetary value by buying the point after 90 yearss. which seemed a small better to me. When I did the math once more. it would be out to be $ 1728 sum to have after leasing for 90 yearss. This is still approximately double the monetary value of purchasing it instantly.

My following point I compared was the scope. A GE-30” Freestanding Electric Range. Black-on-Black Quickset III oven. At Best Buy this was $ 429. 99 to have instantly. Rent-A-Center had the same oven for $ 24. 99 to lease per hebdomad for 74 hebdomads. The entire to have after leasing for 74 hebdomads at $ 24. 99 was $ 1849. After 90 yearss of leasing. the entire monetary value to have would be $ 924. 63. The monetary values are clearly different. but yet it seems manageable when you are at that place. Looking at a monetary value of $ 25 a hebdomad for a nice. trade name new range seems reasonably manageable if you have a low income. When you look at the math and how much it will really be to lease instead than ain. it is really over four times the original monetary value to have the oven upfront.

The last point I compared was a telecasting. an Insignia© Advanced 42” Class/1080p/ 120Hz/ LCD. This point from Best Buy was $ 749. 99 to have instantly. Rent-A-Center had the same telecasting for $ 39. 99 to lease per hebdomad. for 74 hebdomads. It seems like a sensible. low-cost monetary value until you calculate it and recognize that it would be $ 2959 sum to have after 74 hebdomads of leasing. This is approximately four times the original monetary value. After 90 yearss of leasing. the “discount” monetary value to have. at Rent-A-Center is $ 1479. still double the original monetary value.

All three of the points I chose to compare are most needed in places. with the exclusion of the telecasting. Although it is non a necessity. about all places have at least one telecasting. When those who are populating in poorness want to have these points. they will hold battles to afford paying them. They turn to the option of leasing because they see the low monetary value and it entreaties that it is low-cost to them. The little payments they think they can afford hebdomadally add up and stop up bing them quartet of original monetary values.

In decision. being hapless is a battle. It costs much more money and clip to be hapless. Working tonss of hours and doing small money takes a toll on many people here in the United States. I wanted to demo readers that this is a really realistic subject to analyze. and that the cost of poorness is high. The obstructions and disadvantages those in poorness have to cover with are thwarting. nerve-racking. and in demand of alteration. Poverty is a really hard thing to understand and take control over because life styles can non be forced upon. Peoples choose their ain waies of life. and deficiency of instruction. occupations. motive. kids and many other state of affairss are unmanageable. In our society. I think it is of import to cognize the battles of those in poorness afflicted state of affairss and to understand their adversities.

This can be motive to those in it. or headed towards it in their hereafter. Learning about the costs and disadvantages poverty comes with can be a motivative factor for people to travel to college and acquire an instruction to have a well paying occupation. acquire a occupation in general. educate themselves about salvaging money. and larning that leasing is non cheaper than having. Hopefully my research will be good to those in college. populating on low income. to make good in school to derive better occupations. educate those in poorness about the costs they are passing and calculating new options. and to open eyes to those that think it is inexpensive to be hapless. Bing in poorness costs clip and the cost of poorness is surely high. In the terminal. the high cost of poorness will be a ne’er stoping rhythm of clip and money and I hope this research paper opens the eyes of all persons to assist do this job alteration.

Bibliography
Brown. D. L. ( 2009 ) . The High Cost of Poverty: Why the Poor Pay More. Lexis Nexis Academic. A-4. Bureau of the Census. ( 2011 ) . Income Alternative Poverty Estimates in the United States. Washington D. C: U. S Census Bureau. Drewnowski. A. ( 2009 ) . Nutrition Reviews: Fleshiness. diets. and societal inequalities. Seattle: University of Washington. Isidore. C. ( 2011. September 27 ) . CNN Money. Retrieved November 15. 2011. from Not acquiring by on minimal pay: hypertext transfer protocol: //money. cnn. com/2011/09/27/news/economy/minimum_wage_jobs/index. htm Jason M. Sutherland. E. S. ( 2009 ) . Geting Past Denial — The High Cost of Health Care in the United States. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1227-30. Mirriam Webster. ( 2011 ) . Mirriam Webster Dictonary. Dictionary. Brittanica Company. Hankering. H. ( 2011. September 13 ) . Yahoo News. ( A. Imperativeness. Ed. ) Retrieved November 15. 2011. from Census: US poorness rate crestless waves to about 1 in 6: hypertext transfer protocol: //news. yokel. com/census-us-poverty-rate-swells-nearly-1-6-142639972. hypertext markup language