R.k Narayan is regarded as one of the greatest of Indian Hagiographas in English. He is the most artistic of the Indian authors, his exclusive purpose being to give aesthetic satisfaction and non to utilize his art as a medium of propaganda or to function some societal intent. The novelist was ne’er a good pupil. He failed in both high school and intermediate scrutiny. He could acquire his grade merely when he was 24 old ages old. These failures at school and college have made him shy, reserved and diffident, an introvert and non an extravert.
The Guide received the shatiya Akademi award for the twelvemonth 1960.He was awarded padma Bhushan in 1964, University of leads conferred on him the Honrary D.Litt in 1967, and Delhi University followed suit in 1973.He has been included in the authors and their Works series being published by the British Council ; he was the lone Indian so far to hold achieved this differentiation. He visited U.S.A in 1956, on an invitation from the Rockfeller Foundation. Many of his narratives and studies have been broadcast by the B.B.C, a rare differentiation. His plants have been published both in England and the U.S.A and both these states he has enjoyed broad popularity. In America he is regarded following merely to Faulkner and graham Greene. His plant throw considerable visible radiation on his character and personality
We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!
R.K Narayan is non merely a great novelist, but besides a prima author of short narratives in English. From 1939-1945, He did non print any full lengths novel. Between The Dark Room, 1938 and The English Teacher, 1945, there is a spread of seven old ages. The flooring domestic calamity, and the horrors of the universe WarII, it seems touched the sensitive Narayan excessively about and he could non do any sustained artistic attempt. However, He was non wholly idle. During this period he contributed a figure of short narratives to the Hindu and to the short lived Quarterly Journal Indian Thought. These short narratives were subsequently on published in book signifier and are among the finest Indo-Anglian short Stories. R.K Narayan is one of the greatest of Indian authors of fiction. R.K Narayan is a novelist who has no axe to crunch. He is the rare illustration of a pure creative person. One who writes for the interest of art and non out of any subterranean motivations? That is why his popularity has been world-wide and permanent. His plants have been translated into a figure of linguistic communications of the universe, and his repute as an creative person has been steadily lifting.
His deliberate withdrawal from the societal and political agitation of the clip distinguishes him from his modern-day novelist. Without doing castanetss he asserts:
“ Do n’t bury I am merely a fiction author and non a historian
philosopher or societal scientist. My wont is to take things as
as they are. Excessively much analyses proves a disability to my
Understandingaˆ¦It is indispensable that I should keep my
Objective ” .
“ One should non resuscitate history blindly and stir up the
resentment of other yearss. It serves no intent. Let us
Forget the yesteryear and see what we may make now ” .
R.k Narayan is one of those lucky authors who have achieved acknowledgment with the publication of his very foremost novel. He has ten novels, approximately hundred short narratives, a figure of articles and studies, to his recognition, and all his big organic structure of work, with few exclusion [ as The Dark Room ] , is uniformly of a high criterion, his first three novels trades with the life of the three different phases in the life of the same character, though he is given different names. Swami and Friends, The Bachelor of art and The English Teacher are novels of school and college life and they are profoundly autobiographical. The Dark Room and the sweet-vendor are besides fresh of domestic life. The Financial expert, Mr.Sampath, The Guide and The Man Eater Of the malgudi, trades with the callings of money runing work forces of the universe. Normally Narayan takes no note of the stirring political event of the twenty-four hours, but in the Waiting of the Mahatma Gandhi he has introduced the figure of the great Mahatma, and the consequence is instead melodramatic, but this excessively is non a political novel. It was no uncertainty an artistic error to hold dragged in the great mahatma, excessively large for any individual work of art, but the Gandhian motion is non its subject.Its existent subject is the love narrative of Sri Ram and Bharati, and it has been dealt with efficaciously and believably.
All this work is unusually even in the quality of its accomplishment. Naturally, his ulterior work is more complex, and more introverted than his earlier work, but there can be no inquiry about the quality even of his earlier work. Narayan ‘s is an art for art ‘s interest, but it does non intend that he is a author without any vision of life. It merely means that there is no intrusive message, doctrine or morality in his novels. Narayan is the Godhead of Malgudi. He has put this peculiar part of south Indian on the universe map. His intervention of it is realistic and graphic, so much so that many have taken the fabricated to be the existent, and have tried to place the assorted geographical characteristics and other landmarks that invariably recur in his novels. Narayan is a great regional novelist. It is against the back-drop of Malgudi scenes and sights that Narayan surveies life ‘s small sarcasms, which have ever been the same in every age and state. His novels are tragic-comedies of bad luck and misdirection, surveies in the hu8hu adult male quandary which, basically, has ever been the same. From the peculiar Narayan rises to the general, and strength and catholicity are achieved by concentration.Narayan is the Godhead of a whole picture-gallery of the immortal of literature. A figure of life-like memorable figures move in and out of his novels, and one time we have been acquainted with them, we can ne’er bury them. He writes of the in-between category, his ain category, the members of which are neither excessively good off non to be worried normally modest, sensitive, fervent and sufficiently witting to hold an active.
Narayan regarded as one of the large three among the Indian novelist in English has been admired for his singular for stating narratives.portraying memorable people of little oddnesss and eccentricities, and for his temper. Narayan ‘s fiction seldom addresses political issues or high doctrine. He writes with grace and temper about the fictional town Malgudi and its dwellers ; and their small lives. Narayan ‘s amusing vision is ironical. His across-the-board sarcasm which includes the peculiar societal context in his work forces and adult females who have their assorted dealing and the experiential world based on their peculiar experiences. Narayan is authoritative Teller of narratives ; an digesting entreaty springs from his canvas where common adult male and adult females of all the times and topographic points are joined in their commonality. Narayan weaved a universe bing nowhere, but striking a chord of perfect world with readers across the English reading peoples. His books appeal in a quiet reassuring manner and have a remained a popular really many decennaries. His authorship is besides portion of literature coursework in some American universities. Narayan evokes a alone enunciation of unusual freshness and rare inventiveness with English literary parlance.
Narayan can be said to be a regional novelist in a higher originative sense. Narayan ‘s narratives have a functional locale-Malgudi, an fanciful universe. Malgudi a little south Indian town provides the scene for about all of Narayan ‘s novels and short narratives. The category between the tradition and modernness in which Narayan ‘s characters are sandwiched has ironical deductions. In his fresh modernness is the roseola and unprompted force that disturbs the peaceable equilibrium of traditional life. The character in the thick of this struggle emerges as amusing and monstrous figures. Narayan is the author with a full committedness to certain religious and spiritual thought with which the Indian are familiar and he has been able to perforate into the nucleus of Indian life without being hampered by jobs of regionalism, faith, dramatis personae and category with which an Indian author has to come to clasps. Narayan is a short author and novelist, has its restrictions excessively. The universe of his creative activity is non full of volcanic inferno or tragic ups and down. Even so it is a large universe full of smiling and cryings and ideas and play, blending them into a degree. It does non necessitate a really great creative person to do an interesting narrative out of really ordinary daily incidents of life. Narayan ‘s novels are straightforward realistic images undisturbed by phantasy. The rational involvement is the chief spring of his inspiration and that is the angle from which he approaches all the facets of his capable affair. The consequence is that he analyses actions and diagnoses motivations.
Narayan characters are true kids of Malgudi. He portrays a assortment of characters covering the whole gamut of life. Narayan ‘s character covering the whole gamut of life. Narayan character represents varied aspects of human nature which are neither good nor bad. Human nature is presented interestingly and unforgettably, there is no over disapprobation or congratulations. Narayan intentionally restricts himself to and insists on affairs of mundane life, and hence he chooses ordinary work forces and adult females for his novels. His supporters are anything but outstanding. Malgudi is peopled by norm and ordinary work forces and adult females, who by and large belong to middle and lower-middle categories of the Indian society. In the novel of Narayan without outlook it is the adult male or adult female of ordinary abilities instead than the extraordinary individual that seeks to gain some or other aspiration, fails or achieves a step of success in society which is more traditional than modern.
Malgudi experiences some more fleet alterations, the impact of which is reflected on the traditional Indian society with its century-old civilization, imposts, beliefs and superstitious notions. He wrote about people in a little town in South India: little people, large talk, and little behaviors. To some extend that reflected the life of Narayan. Narayan ‘s universe is non, after all, as rooted and complete as it appears. His little people dream merely of what they think has gone earlier, but they are without personal lineage ; there is the great space in their yesteryear. Their lives are little, as they have to be: this littleness is what has been allowed to come up in the ruins, with the simple new construction of the British colonial order ( school, route, bank, tribunals ) .
The heroes of the Narayan are ne’er drawn on a epic graduated table. Narayan is the Godhead of un-heroic heroes. The heroes of the Narayan do non command events, the events command them. They are incapacitated animals torn by desires. Raju, the Guide dies a destroyed adult male non because he wanted to decease, but fortunes so conspired that the lone surrogate before him was to go a willing sufferer. It hence transpires the heroes as besides heroines of Narayan depend upon a opportunity or fortune for their felicity or sadness ; and if things go contrary, they merely run off and sometimes even become Sanyasis. It might look that the best solution harmonizing to Narayan for immoralities of life is: “ If you are defeated, runaway ” .
Fictional characters of Narayan bear the same cast of rational analysis. They are drawn, in their ain limited sphere, with convincing psychological consistence. These characters are full of life and verve. They are thoroughly human in their like and disfavors. Krishna, the philosophic minded lector in English with all his idealism stands in crisp contrast with the worldly minded Ramani, who founded felicity in a kept woman. Mr. Sampath, the carefree self-seeker serves as a foil to Raju, the Guide, who of all his inventiveness loses his caput on the love of Rosie. Savitri, the proud staunch Hindu married woman is rather different from the independent minded Rosie. Even the minor characters have a lasting imprint on the head of the reader.
It is surprising to observe that exhaustively bad characters and the alleged villans so beloved to the Black Marias of the novelist have no topographic point in the novels of Narayan. Narayan is non out to prophesy any moral or to plead any cause.
Narayan is the most nonsubjective author among the Indo-Anglian novelists. This really objectiveness reflected in Narayan ‘s attack to his capable affair. In most of the Indo-Anglian novels there are figure of the character and incidents woven unit of ammunition immature hero and heroine and it ends with the happy stoping. But Narayan ‘s attack is wholly different. Narayan starts with an thought of character and state of affairs and the secret plan progresses on the line he conceives to be the logical development of the thought. It means no matrimony, no happy stoping and no hero of standardised stature. In the Swami and friends, the hero is merely a immature male child making nil brave or baronial or adventuresome. The hero of The Bachelor of Arts, chandran is an ordinary college pupil. The heroes of Narayan of Narayan do non near the conventional heroic type. Since the action of the narratives of Narayan logically springs from characters, such as inflectional morphology, concidence, sudden reversal of fortunate have no topographic point in the secret plan of Narayan. Narayan give a image of life unaffected by any desire for dramatic attempts. His narratives are conditioned wholly by the logical demands of the state of affairs or character.
The pick of his capable affairs shows that Narayan is a originative creative person. He begins his novels with assurance and engages our attending from the really first page ; so that we settle down to watch him construct his universe. The secret plan of the Narayan are built of stuff and the incidents that are neither extra-ordinary nor epic. The tone of his novel is quiet. Narayan selects day-day-day incidents that happen to about every one of us one clip or the other. His universe of creative activity is the large universe of smiling and cryings and ideas and play.
Narayan is the author of the societal novels, which are more or less amusing novels. Every event is described with preciseness and attention, so that the inside informations are right and the event is psychologically converting. His societal life is full of college male childs, college instructor, school Masterss, merchandisers, municipal members, tourer ushers, cab drivers and most of other full blooded character, which form lower center and hapless categories of Malgudi. Princes of blood, commercial barons and rich people turn overing in wealth have no captivation for Narayan and the hapless and the down-trodden category of workers does non animate Narayan with imaginativeness. Narayan tips the in-between class and does non travel beyond the people he has seen and lived with.
His canvas has a limited scope. Sub-plots and interludes are few and far between in the novels of Narayan. His secret plans usually move from one incident to another, taking up to the concluding crisis. All his novels are consecutive forward narratives told by extremely rational head ; as such their involvement is basically rational. They appeal more to the caput than to the bosom.
R.k Narayan is the narrative Teller in the Indian tradition of story-telling. The narrative travel frontward chronologically, each wining event being linked causally with the old 1. Narayan is a short narrative author and novelist, has his restriction excessively. He is an rational who has known the in-between category life of South India at close quarters. But deepnesss of poignancy that move the really interior fibers are beyond the scope of Narayan. He is good at undertones but bold and dramatic flashes are non for him.
Narayan ‘s intent is to entertain, to divert his readers by stating them an interesting narrative, which does ask any great attempt on their portion. He does non prophesy or moralize. Though there is an analysis of human feelings, emotions and motivations, there is no examining into the subconscious and the unconscious as is the instance with the modern novelist. The settlings of poorness, the oppressing tonss of wretchedness can non be found in the pages of Narayan. But within his limited scope, Narayan is an keen maestro of the art of story-telling. In short, Narayan is story-teller, nil less and rarely more.
Human relationship-relationships within the household circle-and relationships focus oning unit of ammunition sex and money, are his of all time repeating subjects, and we can larn from them how to set up right relationships. Life must be accepted and lived ; despite its many short-comings, but it has to be gleaned by each reader harmonizing to the visible radiation that is in him. Narayan has intentionally avoided political relations and polemics of any sort. The subjects he chooses his fresh be seem to be perennial involvement particularly to a sensitive head interested in human existences. One of them is adult male ‘s susceptibleness to self-deceit due to entertaining semblances. It is the most perennial and it provides first-class field for Narayan ‘s relationship, the repudiation, struggle between the tradition and modernness, the east -west brush, instruction, etc. Narayan ‘s method is to handle his subjects, non in abstract or didactic footings but in footings of persons in flesh and flood their experiences And the cosmopolitan entreaty of his novels, although they confine themselves a narrow part in south Indian. The subjects of Narayan are all inter-related and inter-dependent. But for the intents of survey and analysis one may hold to insulate them.
The mainspring of Narayan ‘s fictional art is his abiding, humane and responsible involvement in assortments of people, particularly the huge bulk of the norm and the ordinary, and in the illimitable possibilities of their lives. The fictional universe of R.K Narayan in its geographic expedition of the familial relationship of the domestic universe is mostly devoted to the survey of the household and assorted household relationships in item, as the household forms the basic unit for any society. Narayan presents his supporters against the background of their households and dealingss. He skilfully draws peculiar attending to assorted inside informations of their households. Many of them are seen rooted in the tradition, imposts, beliefs and superstitious notions of their households. Therefore every one of the of import character is given a recognizable individuality and helped to come alive.
The first two novels of Narayan, Swami and Friends and The Bachelor of Arts illustrate this point. The cardinal subject of either novel is growing towards emotional adulthood which involves a crisis. Some of his novels trade with characters who strive to recognize their absurd purposes and aspirations, irrespective of the effects. There are others who in malice of the obstructions, duty, and restrictions placed over them by the bonds of household and restricted by a rigorous societal codification, strive to recognize their purposes and aspirations, irrespective of the effects.
The supporter of some of the novels feel impelled to seek some signifier of repudiation because of defeat, letdown, failure and failure of the relationship. The English instructor depicts Krishna ‘s heartache at the premature decease of his married woman and his approachs to term with the tragic fact. His coming into psychic contact with the spirit of his married woman enables him bit by bit to accept her decease every bit good as. The usher presents the subject of the deceitful sanctum adult male or guru from a fresh angle. The novelist makes a satiric exposure of the false sannyasi far less of import than concentrating attending on the function of religion that a credulous community topographic points in one who is believed to be holy adult male and its effects to both the ascetic as an persons and a public figure, and to the humanity.
Narayan is a author with a full committedness to a certain religious and spiritual thoughts with which Indians are usually familiar and he has been able to perforate into the nucleus of Indian life without being hampered by jobs of regionalism, faith, caste and category with which an Indian author has to come to clasps.
Narayan ‘s manner embodies his vision of life, the typical life of Malgudi in an inordinately simple and unpretentious linguistic communication with no staining after effects. Narayan has a singular bid over English linguistic communication and used it as a medium of storytelling in simple, natural, limpid and unaffected mode. His manner is rich with images and metaphors ; allusions and citations non merely from the Sanskrit classics, but besides from the Gallic literature. Narayan attempts to shoot the spirit and pacing of Tamilian parlance into English address in a natural and unaffected mode. Narayan ‘s manner is so uniformly simple that the most farcical every bit good as the most serious events are described in the vena.
Narayan ‘s linguistic communication belongs to the mundane universe of ordinary people. It is the linguistic communication in which the norm Malgudians dream, love and indulge in their little wars. Laugh and plaint. His manner gives the distinguishable feeling of a little South Indian community confined to peculiar temporal and particular scene, their manners and contemplations, conversations and ideas, and natural reactions to the things.
Narayan ‘s sarcasm dissembles in temper, and the reader realizes merely when hit. Narayan ‘s simple manner of narratives holds up a mirror to the simple, on occasion ambitious, and the relaxed manner of life of the Malgudians.
Narayan ‘s novels have so many surveies in human relationships, peculiarly, household relationships. Of relationships within the household, father-son relationship is most often studied. As his art matured, his survey of human relationships became more complex and intricate. Such comAplex relationships which he explores are those which centre unit of ammunition sex or money. These relationships are of peculiar importance in The Financial Expert, The Guide, and The Man-Eater of Malgudi. In these novels money and sex appear in different pretenses and are explored and studied from difAferent angles. Excessive preoccupation with either money or sex is an aberrance which consequences in strifes and disharmony-in the disrupting of the normal household life, for instance-but peace and harmoniousness finally return and normalcy is restored. This is so much so the instance that the break of the recognized order and ultimate Restoration of normality may be said to be the cardinal subject of the, novels.
Narayan is an Indian authorship novels in the Indian tradition of story-telling. Fantasy is a common quality in Indian narratives and so, despite his pragmatism, phantasy is besides an component in the narratives of R.K. Narayan. Fantasy may be defined as the absurd, the flake, and the unlikely, as something which is barely possible in existent life. It is as if the novelist gives free reign to his imaginativeness, throws the Torahs of logic and natural causing to the air currents and the consequence is antic and absurd. The first half frequently has first-class realistically-drawn scene, word picture and action. About half manner through, there is a distinguishable interruption and fantasy takes over.
Narayan has a singular bid over the English linguistic communication and used it as a medium of storytelling in a simple, natural, limpid and unaffected mode ; the conversation of his character ne’er reads like a interlingual rendition, while it is at the same clip free from English colloquialism which in the circumstance would peal false. He manages to do his people speak ; in fact, as they would talk if English were their linguistic communication. Narayan ‘s manner is so uniformly simple that the most farcical every bit good as the most serious events are described in a same vena. Simplicity of linguistic communication and manner imparts pointedness to his amusing sarcasm. In malice of pungency and simpleness, Narayan manner is rich in evocativeness and suggestiveness.
The ulterior novel of the R.k Narayan are based on the classical myths-the inevitable triumph of the good over the immorality, the jurisprudence of life and the construct of karma, the construct of cyclical being and the four phases of human life. The ulterior novels The Man-Eater of Malgudi, The Painter of Signs embody the spiritual and cultural glorification of Hindu society. The novels are marked with adulthood in fictional imaginativeness.
The Man-Eater of Malgudi is an allegory screening that immorality is suicidal. In this novel, Narayan employs the Bhasmasura myth. The rubric of the novel is dry for cannibal in the novel is no tiger, but mighty adult male, Vasu, who non merely kills a figure of wild animate beings, but besides kills himself with a individual blow of his hammer- like fist.
The narrative is narrated in the first individual by its tragic-comic hero, Nataraj, a pressman of Malgudi. In his printing work he is assisted by Mr. Sastri, who is a typesetter, cogent evidence reader and a machine adult male, all rolled into one? Among his changeless comrades are a poet who is engaged in composing the life of God Krishna and Mr. Sen, the journalist who ever runs down Nehru. The smooth and congenial life of this little group is disturbed by the reaching of Vasu, who comes to remain with them as a renter in the room in the upper floor of the printing imperativeness. This tall adult male of about six pess, with bull cervix, cock fist and aggressive behavior arouses fear in the bosom of the Nataraj and his friends. Natraj tolerates him in his room upstairs boulder clay he makes himself intolerable by robbing Mempi forest of its wild life and roll uping dead animate beings in his room for stuffing them. When even Natraj ‘s neighbor compains to him about the insanitary conditions of the vicinity, he request Vasu to happen a new house for himself. The animal stuffer treats this as an abuse and sues him for hassling him and seeking to evict him by improper agencies. The timely aid from his clients, an old attorney, his ability to protract a instance beyond the widest dream of a litigator, saves Nataraj from the clasps of the jurisprudence. Soon after Vasu starts conveying Rangi, A ill-famed dancing adult female and some other adult females like her, to his room, to the great nuisance of all concerned. But Vasu cares excessively hoots for their feelings.
The crisis, nevertheless, comes to a caput when the pitiless animal stuffer threatens to kill Kumar, a temple elephant who is to be taken in a festival emanation organized to observe the poet ‘s completion of his spiritual heroic poem on God Krishna. Nataraj is really fond of the elephant, kumar. He becomes of course upset the minute he learns from Rangi that Vasu intends hiting it on the dark of the proposed emanation. Nataraj instantly posts the wicked purposes of Vasu to his friend, the poet, the attorney, and other of import people of the town. The affair is reported to the constabulary governments but they express their inability to take any action against him until the offense has been really committed.
The really idea of the temple-elephant, kumar ‘s slaying, drives Nataraj loony. Even while compelled to remain in his house owing to the agitated status of his head, he invariably thinks of the danger expecting Kumar. As the emanation passes in forepart of the printing imperativeness, his bosom begins to crush oppose a rap with fright. He is afraid of hearing the fatal gun shootings and calls of panicky people. He is surprised when the emanation passes off without any indecent incident.
Freed from a nagging concern, Natarj goes to his office in the forenoon. To his utter daze and discouragement, he learns that Vasu, the animal stuffer is dead. The constabulary governments of the town shortly start probes. Murder is suspected ; Nataraj, his friends and Rangi, the temple terpsichorean, are interrogated by the constabulary. From the medical study it is gathered that Vasu had died of a concussion received on his right brow from a blunt instrument. When the constabulary fail to happen any hint of the perpetrator, the affair is dropped. Rangi subsequently tells them that while striking a mosquito that settled on his brow, Vasu slapped his temple and died outright. He therefore died of his ain hammer-fist.
The novel has a well-set secret plan and a all right gallery of vivid, life like characters. The character of Vasu, the cardinal figure is a chef-d’oeuvre. The narrative is enlivened by Narayan ‘s amusing vision which really frequently and mingles with poignancy.
The Painter sings is evidently a novel which underlines the job originating out of it. The usage of an ancient Hindu fable is significantly obvious in the novel after The Man-Eater of Malgudi.
The usher is the most popular novel of R.K Narayan. It was published in 1958, and won the Sahitya Academy Award for 1960. It has been filmed and the movie has ever drawn packed-houses.
It narrates the escapades of a railroad usher, popularly Known as Railway Raju. As a tourer usher he is widely popular. It is this career which brings him in contact with Marco and his beautiful married woman, Rosie. While the hubby is busy with his archeological surveies, Raju seduces his married woman and has a good clip with her. Ultimately the hubby comes to cognize of the matter and travel off to the Madras go forthing Rosie buttocks. Rosie comes and stays with Raju in his one-roomed house. His female parent tolerates her for sometimes, but when things become intolerable, she calls her brother and goes off with him, go forthing Raju to look after Rosie and the house.
Rosie is a born terpsichorean, she practises on a regular basis and shortly Raju finds an gap for her. In her really first visual aspect she is a expansive success. Soon she is really much in demand and their earning addition enormously. Raju lives extravagantly, entertains a big figure of friends with whom he drinks and gambles. All goes good till raju forges Rosie ‘s signatures to obtain valuable jewelry lying with her hubby. The act lands him in gaol. Rosie leaves Malgudi and goes off to Madras, her home-town. She goes on with her dance and does good without the aid and direction of Raju, of which he was so proud. On his release from gaol, raju takes shelter in a abandoned temple on the Bankss of the river Sarayu, a few stat mis off from Malgudi and near to the small town called Mangla. The simple villagers take him to be a 3Mahatma, Begin to idolize him, and convey for him a batch of comestibles as nowadayss. Raju is rather comfy and performs the new function of a saint to flawlessness. However, shortly there is a serve dearth and drouth and the villagers expect Raju to set about the fast. The fast attracts much attending and people come to hold Darshan of the Mahatma from far and broad. On the 12th twenty-four hours of the fast, Raju falls down exhausted merely as there are mark of rain on the distant skyline. It is non certain whether he is really dead, or has simply fainted. Thus the fresh terminals on a note of ambiguity.