Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were two of the great political theoreticians of their clip. They both provided fantastic philosophical texts on how our authorities should regulate us. This paper will demo the largest differences and some of the similarities between Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan and John Locke’s Second Treatise on Civil Government. Although they do hold some similarities. Hobbes and Locke have different positions on most of their political statements. and I will spread out on their differences on the province of nature. authorities. and societal contract.

Hobbes’ position of the province of nature and Locke’s position of the province of nature offer singular differences. Hobbes believed people act on their ain opportunism. and they would travel to any extreme to assist themselves. He believed we are ever in competition with each other for the best nutrient. shelter. money. and so on. Hobbes believed the best manner to protect citizens would be to hold a crowned head that is intimidating and almighty.

The position Locke had on the province of nature is conceptually different. Locke’s position of the province of nature says that worlds have bounds as to what we should or should non make. but he believed that worlds are by and large nice to one another. and we will non trouble oneself one another. Therefore. in Locke’s province of nature. worlds are peaceable. Hobbes. nevertheless. believes that worlds live in a province of war and battle with each other invariably.

Hobbes and Locke did non hold many of the same positions on authorities. Though it is non straight stated in his text. most historiographers believe Hobbes was a protagonist of absolute monarchy. He believed the authorities should hold absolute authorization over all the citizens. He believed if such a authorities did non be. we would populate in a universe of convulsion. The crowned head ( authorities ) has the duty of maintaining the peace and. when demand be. national defence. The autonomous establishes all the Torahs. and has complete legislative. judicial. and executive authorization.

Locke’s position of authorities is really different from Hobbes’ . Locke believes people should hold a say in authorities. and Hobbes would differ with this statement. Hobbes believes that the crowned head should have all the land. but Locke believes that belongings is private–God gave us this belongings. and we should utilize and bask it. Locke is besides a protagonist of the market economic system. He believes that when one invests his ain labour. whatever he makes should go his ain private belongings.

Government is really much linked with Hobbes’ and Locke’s positions on societal contract. Social contract binds the people and the authorities together. Hobbes thinks that citizens should release all of their rights to the crowned head. because the crowned head knows what is best for them. Theoretically. in Hobbes’ position. there really is no contract. because the citizens have no rights. His position of societal contract is more like a compact. The lone clip the citizens can state “no” to a crowned head is when the crowned head threatens self-preservation. For illustration. citizens may be interrogated for a offense. but they do non hold to squeal.

Locke’s position of societal contract is basically different from that of Hobbes–his position is non every bit good defined. Locke believes a societal contract is an understanding made between citizens who institute a authorities to forestall people from on occasion go againsting the natural Torahs. Locke believes the contract between the people and the authorities should be conditional. For the authorities to hold the obeisance and trueness of the citizens. the authorities must execute certain maps and act suitably.

Although they have several differences. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke do portion some of the same beliefs. Both Hobbes and Locke were passionate about political relations. and they both wanted to advance the common good. Both theoreticians believed in the province and Torahs of nature ; they merely had different readings of it. Besides. both Hobbes and Locke both believed that people are free and equal in the province of nature. Hobbes and Locke both believed that the primary intent of the authorities is to protect people. However. if the authorities does non protect the citizens. the citizens can revolt and travel against or above the crowned head. The most of import similarity between Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. nevertheless. is that their plants were influential in determining people and authorities in respects to how a society should run.

Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were the two most influential political theoreticians of their clip. However. they had opposing positions on about every political issue. Their theories stem from their dissenting sentiments about who should be the centre of authorities: Hobbes believed there should be a sovereign. while Locke supported Parliament. Examples of both men’s ideas and sentiments can be found throughout history. France and some other European states sided with Hobbes and had absolute monarchies. while England and subsequently the American Revolution used Locke’s ideas in developing their authoritiess. Hobbes and Locke wrote about and educated the citizens about the two extremes of running authoritiess. and their sentiments were so valuable that we still analyze them today. hence this paper.