Compare and contrast the theories associating to male and female exploitation.

Victimology is the overall survey of exploitation, this is understood as an act that exploits or victimizes an person. Victimology focuses on the victim and the overall mental, physical and economic consequence had on those persons involved after such an juncture. It focuses on who the ideal victim is and on the different personal and sociological facets as to why person could go a victim such as gender, race or societal category ( Walklate, 2007 ) . These surveies are carried out as an effort to protect those who are most at hazard of going a victim in society. This essay aims to concentrate on gender and the effects society has on who is perceived as the ideal victim and in world who is the existent victim. Making so by comparison and contrasting the different theories associating to male and female exploitation. First, through concentrating on gender functions within society, the features of the ideal victim and most significantly analyzing each gender individually utilizing theories such as societal larning theory, hegemonic gender and extremist feminism to associate and distinguish between males and females. Overall it is of import when sing the different theories associating to male and female exploitation to concentrate on the sociological differences between sex and gender. Firstly sex is biological ; it’s what makes up our familial makeup, endocrines and our organic structure parts particularly our sex and generative variety meats. Gender on the other manus refers to the expected gender functions, behavior and attitudes within society (Gender and Gender Identity, 2015 ) .

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

The most influential victimologists, Benjamin Mendelsohn and Hans Von Hentig and Wolfgang are frequently said to be the laminitiss of the subject of victimology introduced in the late fortiess ( Davies, Francis and Jupp, 2004: pg 28-30 ) . In 1957, Marvin Wolfgang carried out an probe into a series of homicides in Philadelphia, when analysing the slayings Wolfgang discovered that many had resulted in interaction between the victim and wrongdoer prior to the actions from the wrongdoer which contributed to their decease therefore this introduced the thought of victim precipitation which meant that the victims either precipitated or provoked their ain victimization ( Davies, Francis and Jupp, 2004: pg 28-30 ) . Similarly Mendelsohn ( 1963 ) was concerned with look intoing the duty of the victim for a condemnable event happening besides, this liability of the victim has been surrounded by much argument because of the construct of doing the victim responsible for their ain bad luck ( Davies, 2010 ) . Alternatively, Hans Von Hentig ( 1948 ) focused on the function the victim played in the commission and hence the creative activity of the condemnable offense, Von Hentig believed that there were some people, based on their socio-economic features that made them more likely to be victims, this impression was called ‘victim proneness’ ( P. M. Davies, Francis and Greer, 2007 ) . All three influential authors where concerned non with detecting who was ‘born victim’ instead set uping the differences between possible victims and those non-victims.

Gender socialisation starts from birth and gender functions are established from an highly immature age from assorted different influences that will impact that person’s features such as household, instruction, equal groups and the mass media. Albert Bandura’s ( 1977 ) societal larning theory is a cardinal facet which links both male and female’s gender functions and how at that place beliefs, behaviours, and features are learned from observation of those around them ( Bandura, 1977: pg3 ) . Interactions with others is what is Bandura believes shapes our features, we learn how to act from others, typically through parents and those close to us at a immature age, learning us what behavior is appropriate and what is ( Bandura, 1977 ) . Even in today’s modern society, both males and females are still subjected to implementing traditional household traits associated with gender functions. Young females are normally influenced by their female parents, ‘typical’ expected functions of the female are cooking, cleansing and caring for their kids. Overall, adult females are seen as the more lovingness, vulnerable sex because of their emotions and endocrines. Young males are normally influenced by the male parent or male function theoretical accounts, their typical functions are to be the bread victor and provide and protect those around them particularly their household. It’s common for them to demo small emotion other than choler or aggression which they are frequently bucked up demoing. Children learn to accommodate their behavior, so that they stop or even conceal behaviors that they might be punished, ridiculed or shamed for ( Bandura, 1977 ) . An illustration of this would be if a male was call or demo his emotions, as this is usually associated with being a female trait, males are frequently mocked for ‘acting like a girl’ therefore they tend to conceal their emotions so non to be ridiculed by their equals. Therefore kids are encouraged to follow the assigned gender functions embedded by society as to suit in.

The ideal victim theory introduced by Nils Christie in 1986 can besides lend to how gender affects exploitation. This thought of the ‘ideal victim’ was who Christie believed to be the ‘ultimate victim’ a individual who to the full meets the conditions to be labelled the term ‘victim’ ( Walklate, 2007: pg91-94 ) . Some features of what might be perceived as the ‘ideal victim’ could be, that the victim is vulnerable and perceived as weak for illustration females, immature, old, disabled or ill. Person who was transporting out a reputable activity when the offense occurred for illustration traveling about their day-to-day concern. That there is no manner that person could be blamed for their exploitation for illustration they did non arouse the wrongdoer and eventually that the wrongdoer was a alien to the victim and seen as an immoral and evil person ( Walklate, 2007: pg91-94 ) . Although these features may non cover every individual class of meriting victim, it does nevertheless make a slightly criteria that’s most normally associated with the alleged ‘picture-perfect’ victim that is so frequently used by the media which is intended to assist maintain the narrative simple, the wrongdoer being bad and the victim being good. Overall, from concentrating on this ‘ideal victim’ standards it would be accurate to presume that adult females fit more with the characteristics than work forces as they are frequently perceived as vulnerable and weak, adult females are besides by and large less likely to be involved in condemnable behavior and besides perceived as the more gentler, caring sex hence less likely to arouse an intended onslaught. However despite society’s attitudes work forces are more likely to be the victim over adult females in all offenses except sex offenses, in world bulk of all offenses committed against males have been committed by another male ( Office for National Statistics, 2013 ) . The ensuing paragraphs purpose at discoursing why these stereotypes exist, associating theories and the worlds about the relation between gender and exploitation.

In today’s society there are legion misinterpretations around work forces and maleness. It is more frequently the instance that when concentrating on exploitation males are seen as being ‘non-victims’ they physically can non be accepted as victims because of the sensed stereotypes embedded by society and the mass media ( P. Davies, Francis and Greer, 2007 ) . In world, work forces are really more frequently portrayed at the victimizer instead than the victim ( Wilson, 2009 ) . When analyzing what maleness is, many of the same responses recur, the masculine ideal is that work forces are the staff of life victors, competitory, aggressive, independent and unemotional, these are merely some of the manful traits associated with the male gender. This relates to the hegemonic maleness theory foremost introduced by sociologist R.W. Connell ( 1987 ) which refers to the cultural kineticss a certain societal group holds within society ( Wilson, 2009 ) . In this instance its mentioning to the ideal signifier of ‘manhood’ and the associations with being male and how the antecedently mentioned traits are what work forces are encouraged to subscribe to as agencies of exercising power over adult females and keep male laterality ( P. Davies, Francis and Greer, 2007: pg151-153 ) . However this theory has been capable to much argument as this cultural idealised signifier of ‘manhood’ is non ever the instance, non all work forces can be stereotyped into the same group as non all work forces carry these features hence making a divide and doing some males feel excluded from society. There is an embedded outlook of what it means to be a ‘real man’ and this is reflected through assorted societal dealingss as antecedently mentioned, this reading of the ideal adult male relates back to childhood and the influences from those around them. Overall these traits are considered the most honoured manner of ‘being a man’ and is seen as the criterion that all work forces should endeavor to be like ( Wilson, 2009 ) . Normative heterosexualism refers of the ideal type of manhood, the thought that heterosexualism is the lone sexual orientation and that this is the norm which is excludes many other males besides. In footings of research and probe into gender exploitation, males are highly underrepresented. Males are frequently categorised as the victimizers alternatively of being victims themselves. One of the traits traditionally associated with work forces as antecedently mentioned is the fact they seldom show emotion, hence, work forces are much less likely to describe being victim of a offense than females, this could be because males see it as weak acknowledging to being a victim or ashamed that others i.e. household members or equals will roast them.

Females are besides faced with similar jobs in footings of the stereotypes that are forced upon gender from society. Alternatively females are frequently categorized as gentle, submissive, caring and non-criminal and because of this and other lending factors they are seen as more likely to be victims over work forces. Feminist victimology was introduced in the 1970’s, frequently adult females were being forgotten about and ignored when it came to criminology due to the fact females are much less involved in the overall condemnable justness system than work forces. Feminism is a scope of different thoughts on the place of adult females within society ; it overall purposes at battling sexism, promotes gender equality and battles for women’s rights ( Fisher and Lab, 2010 ) . There are 4 different political orientations, extremist feminism, broad feminism, sociologist feminism and postmodern feminism. Each rule offers different point of views when sing the assorted political and policy schemes refering adult females in society. Extremist feminism is considered the most influential, this is the position that adult females are straight affected and made to experience powerless by male laterality it focuses non merely patriarchy but how to get rid of it ( Fisher and Lab, 2010 ) . Although work forces are more likely to be a victim of offense than females, females are more likely to victim of a sex offense than males ; extremist feminism focuses on sex offenses for illustration, sexual force and torment, colza and domestic force. Overall, women’s rightists reject the thought of victim precipitation that adult females could lend in any manner to their ain exploitation. Besides the rejection of the label ‘victim’ could intend that females are perceived as weak and vulnerable hence some women’s rightists refuse to be referred to as victims ; they prefer the term subsister as a manner of demoing finding and positive attitude to help recovery ( Fisher and Lab, 2010 ) . Womans are frequently categorised as the victim and face certain stereotypes that are they find hard to interrupt from. The benefit of the attending feminism has received is that it has exposed the different sex offenses against adult females and made the offenses be taken more earnestly, which has non merely led to improved consciousness of such offenses but encouraged adult females to come frontward and describe such demeaning offenses.

Bing the victim of a offense can be highly unsettling and nerve-racking, when it comes to get bying with such an experience and what’s available as agencies of support to assist acquire through, work forces are particularly disadvantaged. There is deficiency of services suited to their demands, hence many males turn to other ways of get bying with the psychological challenges faced, for illustration privacy or alcohol addiction both earnestly harmful for that person. Womans have entree to back up non merely from household and equals but support groups and mental wellness entree to assistance in the recovery procedure depending what clip of offense they were victim to. For illustration Rape Crisis is a specialist service created to assist and back up adult females and immature misss who had fallen victim to any signifier of sexual assault and are at that place to raise consciousness and work towards get rid ofing sexual development of females (Rape, 2015 ) . The job with ‘gender’ is the force per unit area it puts on persons by society to populate by certain features or traits strictly based on their sex. It is obvious that in today’s modern society work forces are non all the same, intending they do non all carry the same traits. Merely as adult females fight so non to be categorized as weak and vulnerable, work forces should be making the same. Feminists put themselves into the public oculus to contend for their right for equality whereas work forces either seek to populate up to the stereotype or are either excessively cowardly or ashamed to contend against it. Females receive media attending, runs and support groups to raise consciousness of female exploitation which is positive in that it raises consciousness in concerns to sexual exploitation, but when sing who the existent victim is, males, they receive small to no research into their jobs based strictly on the fact that they don’t fit the victim standard. Overall, work forces are encouraged to remain within the stereotype whereas adult females are encouraged to interrupt free from it.

In decision, through comparison and contrasting theories such as societal larning theory, the ideal victim, hegemonic maleness and extremist feminism it is clear that gender-related exploitation is disproportionately concentrated on adult females. Through gender socialisation, stereotypes curtail both genders to delegating to rigorous traditional functions. On one manus adult females are encouraged to interrupt free from the categorization of the ‘ideal victim’ and are empowered by each other to stop gender inequality through extremist feminism, whereas work forces feel confined to the stereotypes typically associated with the hegemonic gender theory and are encouraged to idealise the male stereotype. Although they each have similar jobs in that they both face restraining stereotypes which they both want to get away from. Work force are seen as non-victims whereas adult females are seen as the ideal victim therefore encouraging fright onto adult females that they will go victims. Although it is blatantly obvious that work forces are more victim to offense than adult females they still do non have appropriate acknowledgment for their fortunes.


Bandura, A. ( 1977 )Social acquisition theory. United States: Englewood Cliffs, N.J.aˆ? : Prentice Hall, c1977

Davies, P. ( 2010 )Gender, Crime and Victimisation. United Kingdom: Sage Publications Ltd

Davies, P. M. , Francis, P. W. and Greer, C. ( 2007 )Victims, offense and society. Edited by C. Greer and P. Francis. United Kingdom: Sage Publications Ltd

Davies, P. , Francis, P. and Greer, C. ( 2007 )Victims, offense and society. United Kingdom: Sage Publications Ltd.

Davies, P. , Francis, P. and Jupp, V. ( 2004 )Exploitation: theory, research and policy. United States: Palgrave Macmillan.

Dowd, N. ( 2010 )The Man Question: Male Subordination and Privilege. United States: New York University Press.

Fisher, B. S. and Lab, S. P. ( 2010 )Encyclopedia of Victimology and Crime Prevention 2 Volume Set. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications Inc.

Gender and Gender Identity( 2015 ) . Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: // ( Accessed: 16 March 2015 ) .

Rape Crisis( 2015 ) . Rape Crisis – England and Wales. Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: // ( Accessed: 16 March 2015 ) .

Office for National Statistics. ( 2013 )The likeliness of going a victim of offense. Office For National Statistics. Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: // ( Accessed: 16 March 2015

Walklate, S. ( 2007 )Handbook on Victims and Victimology. United Kingdom: Willan Publishing ( UK ) .

Williams, B. , Chong, G. and Hannah, . B. ( 2009 )Victims and Victimisation: A Reader. United Kingdom: Open University Press

Wilson, J. K. and editor. ( 2009 )The Praeger enchiridion of victimology. Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger Publishers Inc.