Footings of Mention: We will be looking at legal, economical, cultural and infrastructural factors that could act upon our determination on the attraction of the states we have researched. Limits to this study include disparities and ambiguity in planetary information sing the states in inquiry.

Procedure: Information was gathered from internet research and group treatments. Extra information was from current personal businesss analysis.

Findingss: The four states that we are analyzing are China, Russia, Poland and France.

Political & A ; Legal hindrances and attractive forces:

Political System

Legal System

Evaluated Grading ( 1-4 )

China

Single Party Socialist Republic ( Communist )

Constitutional

3

France

Multi-party Democracy

Constitutional

2

Soviet union

Multi-party Democracy

Constitutional

4

Poland

Multi-party Democracy

Constitutional

1

China ‘s legal system can be ranked in degrees, the highest signifier of jurisprudence being wide and general. The Chinese legislative organic structure, the National People ‘s Congress are responsible for go throughing Torahs. Regulations issued by the province ministries form the following tableland, and are used in the reading and definition of the jurisprudence. The concluding degree is the steering sentiments, which are n’t binding and are used as commissariats ; the majority of the jurisprudence is in their certification. The chief Southern Cross of Chinese jurisprudence is ordinances and steering sentiments. Recently ( 2006 ) China started printing Torahs & A ; ordinances on how it should both reappraisal and potentially barricade, proposed foreign acquisitions which in its sentiment do n’t function general involvements of its economic system. There ‘s 2 chief policy ordinances that control the Foreign investing reappraisal ; The 2006 ‘Provisions for Merger and Acquisition of Domestic Enterprises ‘ by Foreign Investors which acts as the uttermost protection for pull offing foreign investing. These patterned advances are hailed as a good thing, and are said to do China more consistent with planetary rules of concern. The 2006 ordinances deem it necessary to hold authorities blessing if investing concerns national economic security, involves a major industry, or consequences in the transportation of celebrated hallmarks or traditional Chinese trade names. Breaching ordinances could do implemented surcease of trading in the state. Following is Chinese ‘Catalogue for the Guidance of Foreign Investment Industries ‘ , which purports to restrict foreign investing in specific countries. The Catalogue largely industrial policy and advisory for foreign investors. It is broken into 3 countries ; “ encouraged, restricted and prohibited ” and anything non in the guidelines is perceived as “ permitted. ”

France regulates foreign direct investing for national security considerations through Decree No. 2005-1739, implementing Article L. 151 of the Gallic Monetary and Financial Code. The Decree lists 11 specific sectors capable to foreign investing ordinance on the evidences of supporting France ‘s public order, public safety, or national defense mechanism involvements, every bit good as separating between EU investors and non-EU investors, with less limitations applicable to the former.

Harmonizing to the Gallic Monetary and Financial Code, fiscal traffics between France and foreign states are unrestricted. However, certain exclusions to this general policy relate to the ordinance of foreign investing for national security considerations. The codification states that the Gallic authorities may necessitate a scope of foreign exchange minutess, which includes amalgamations, acquisitions, and other types of foreign investing, to be capable to anterior blessing by the Gallic authorities if they may endanger public order, public safety, or national defense mechanism involvements.

Russia legislative subdivision wields much less power than the executive, and the presidential tally system leaves most power in the custodies of the president.

Under the 1999 Federal Law on Foreign Investments, the Russian authorities may barricade foreign investing to guarantee the defense mechanism of the state and the security of the province. However there has been no noteworthy ordinance or procedure to implement that jurisprudence. In old instances the authorities reviewed the minutess utilizing an informal procedure where affiliate authorities bureaus considered the quandary. Prior to this the State of the Russian Federation address in 2005 heard a call for statute law to officially ordain this procedure by reexamining foreign investing in sensitive economic sectors. As a consequence a version of the bill of exchange statute law was forwarded to Russian legislative for blessing in July of 2007.

Other Torahs and policies in Russia affect foreign investing ; based on a Presidential Decree, certain Russian state-owned endeavors and companies are away bounds to foreign investing. There is a list of around 1000 companies which are n’t feasible to foreign investing including, scientific, defense mechanism, and military mills and institutes ; media companies ; ports ; airdromes ; and transporting companies.

Poland ‘s, authorities construction consists of a council of curates led by a Prime Minister, typically chosen from the bulk alliance in the bicameral legislative assembly ‘s lower house. The primary act in Poland on foreign investing is the Economic Freedom Act of 2 July 2004. It regulates undertaking, running and shutting concerns on the district of Poland, every bit good as undertakings of the public disposal. Foreign individuals from the EU and European Free Trade Agreement zones belonging to the European Economic Area may set about and run concern on the footing of the same regulations applicable to Polish enterprisers.

The same regulations besides apply to aliens populating outside the EEA who: received a license to settle on the Polish district, a consent for tolerated stay or a position of refugee granted in the Republic of Poland, enjoy impermanent protection within this district. Other foreign individuals have the right, unless international understandings province otherwise, to set about and run concern activity merely in the undermentioned signifiers: limited partnership, limited joint-stock partnership, limited liability Company, and joint – stock company. They have besides the right to come in these sorts of partnerships or companies and buy their portions. Furthermore foreign enterprisers may run concern activity in the signifier of subdivision office, and besides set up representative offices on the district of Poland.

State

Power Distance

Individuality

Uncertainty Avoidance

Maleness

Long term orientation

France

68

71

86

43

China

80

20

30

66

118

Soviet union

93

39

95

36

Poland

50

58

73

60

32

( Worldpress, 2009 ) and ( Itim International, 2003 )

*figures merely published in LTO for 23 states

State

Democracy

Corruptness

France

16

16

Poland

46

29

China

57

121

Soviet union

115

125

*Scores shown are universe rank and relate to 179 states surveyed.

( World Audit, 2007 )

Cultural

State

Evaluated Grading ( 1-4 )

China

1

France

3

Soviet union

2

Poland

4

Culture can be regarded as the beliefs, values, behaviors and feature of a peculiar societal, cultural, or age group, this is of utmost importance when incorporating a new merchandise into a foreign market. Cultural differences occur in each of the states discussed, act uponing the merchandises rating, designation, choice and purchase.

As our merchandise ‘s mark market is the younger coevals the construction of each state is of import. The state with the highest growing rate and largest 0-14years old age construction is China, followed closely by France. Sing as the mark market is younger, China would be preferred to Russia. China has the largest population growing rate followed by France, Russia and Poland, hence hitting a market with increased pool of consumers

In Poland and France their buying wonts focus on importance of localized or domestic trade names and merchandises. With Russia this is besides the instance, but as income additions they will return to international trade names supplying chance for new entrants.

When come ining foreign markets China seems the most successful when following foreign trade names and merchandises leting acceptance of international trade names picking up the English linguistic communication. Russia is get downing to develop internationally with the willingness to follow transnational trade names and merchandises. France and Poland are increasing their international trade name exposure easy but still strongly favour and back up their traditional and local trade names.

When linguistic communication is concerned English is the concern linguistic communication worldwide and most dominant. We must see interlingual rendition of merchandise name and reading along with how easy it will be adopted. Meanings may assist gross revenues in one state but may impede in another. When looking at the tabular array the varied linguistic communications present possible linguistic communication barriers. China has become a more planetary, spread outing state more accustomed to English linguistic communication whereas the staying states have many traditional and varied regional linguistic communications, such as France and Poland which may do jobs.

In Poland the rural population normally has the most purchasing power as personal contact with client is critical, success in this market typically requires an in-country presence such as an agent, distributer or representative office. Exporters have found considerable success aiming competitory niches in France and Poland utilizing effectual market entry schemes and diligently following up marketing and gross revenues.

When sing selling when come ining new states cultural facets such as faith, linguistic communication and values are highly of import. It may be easier for a company to establish a merchandise into a state similar to that of their beginning as they will hold an increased apprehension of the other states construction and more personally, their demands

China

Poland

France

Soviet union

Population

1,338,612,968

38,482,919

64,057,792

140,041,247

Age construction:

0-14 old ages: 19.8 %

15-64 old ages: 72.1 %

0-14 old ages: 15 %

15-64 old ages: 71.6 %

0-14 old ages: 18.6 %

15-64 old ages: 65 %

0-14 old ages: 14.8 %

15-64 old ages: 71.5 %

Median age:

entire: 34.1 year

male: 33.5 year

female: 34.7 year

entire: 37.9 year

male: 36.1 year

female: 39.7 year

entire: 39.4 year

male: 38 year

female: 40.9 year

entire: 38.4 year

male: 35.2 year

female: 41.6 year

Population growing:

0.655 %

-0.047 %

0.549 %

-0.467 %

Religions:

Daoist, Buddhist, Christian, Muslim

Roman Catholic, Orthodox, Protestant,

Roman Catholic88 % , Protestant, Jewish, Muslim

Russian Orthodox20 % , Muslim, Christian

Languages:

Chinese, Mandarin

Polish 97.8 % , other and unspecified 2.2 %

Gallic 100 % , worsening regional idioms and linguistic communications

Russian, many minority linguistic communications

( CIA, 2009 )

Economic

State

Evaluated Grading ( 1-4 )

China

2

France

4

Soviet union

3

Poland

1

China is the “ 4th largest economic system in the universe ” and has a “ sustained growing of over 9.5 % for the past 26 old ages ” ( GlobalEDGE, 2009 ) . This rapid growing, nevertheless, has been accompanied by lifting income inequalities. The disparity in income degrees may show deformations and troubles for measuring the attraction of the state. The Chinese authorities has focused on foreign trade as a major medium for economic growing. From Table1 we can see that consumer goods are non widely imported by China ‘s consumers. China ‘s chief importation spouses are Japan, Korea and the US ( Table 1, GlobalEDGE, 2009 ) with trade with the UK merely accounting for a 0.94 % portion of China ‘s importing spouses. However, import trade from the UK has increased by 92.59 % ( GlobalEDGE, 2009 ) . China operates an “ unfastened door ” policy decentralising and deregulating control over its foreign trade alining with the WTO. Four import duties used, such as, general, Most-Favoured-Nation and particular preferential. Import duties, capable to value-added revenue enhancement at 17 % must be paid except on certain goods ( CBBC ) . 15 free trade zones are available and should be considered as discriminatory intervention for import responsibility and import-related revenue enhancements is offered ( CBBC ) .

Russia despite “ enormous emphasis in the 1990s ” ( GlobalEDGE, 2009 ) its economic system has experienced more than nine old ages of “ sustained growing averaging about 7 % ” ( GlobalEDGE, 2009 ) . Before the economic crisis Russia ‘s economic system ‘had been developing at high velocity ‘ ( Xinhua, 2009 ) . 52.9 % of trade in Russia is between themselves and the EU ( European Parliament, 2007 ) , doing possible concern with the state a feasible thought. The UK is non presently one of Russia ‘s top importation spouses ; these being Germany, China and the Ukraine ( Table3, GlobalEDGE, 2009 ) , potentially presenting a job in making demand for UK merchandises. Russia charges a general rate of responsibilities and revenue enhancements of 30 % of the imposts value. Extra revenue enhancements will be added on imports above the value of 650 1000 rubles ( VisaHQ,2009 ) . Import responsibilities, such as 20 % value added revenue enhancement and excise revenue enhancements on imported goods could besides curtail the demand for imports into Russia. Foreign direct investing in Russia is low, uncertainness in the banking industry and its deficiency of resources has discouraged investors. In the current clime, FDI has decreased by a immense 45 % ( Nicholson and Abelsky, 2009 ) . Despite all this the “ Russian market retains its attraction for British investors ” ( Mandelson, 2008 ) . Peter Mandelson has remarked ‘significant activity ‘ in ‘finance, foodstuffaˆ¦etc ‘ ( Mandelson, 2008 ) .

Poland is ‘one of the fastest turning economic systems in Central Europe ‘ ( Foreign and Commonwealth Office, 2009 ) and has been described as “ a important trading spouse for the UK ” ( Foreign and Commonwealth Office, 2009 ) . With a 6 % growing in GDP in 2009 and 5 % growing in 2008, during the recession, shows that it has a moderately stable economic system. As Poland is a member of the EU, trade between member provinces, i.e. the UK, ‘is free and non capable to any responsibilities ‘ ( Polska, 2008 ) . The bulk of Polish imports are capital goods ( Table3, GlobalEDGE, 2009 ) instead than consumer goods, therefore there may potentially be a deficiency of demand for consumer goods. Poland has been described as an “ investing friendly clime ” ( GeographyIQ, 2009 ) nevertheless, investors have complained that province ordinance is non crystalline or predictable. A major ground many companies invest in Poland is the handiness of a ‘much cheaper, but skilled and educated work force ‘ ( Polska, 2008 ) .

France is a assorted economic system and is the 5th largest in the universe and 2nd largest merchandising state in Europe. Trade with the EU histories for 60 % of France ‘s overall trading minutess. As a member of the EU it besides benefits, like Poland, from a common duty and quota strategy. The UK is already one of France ‘s chief importing spouses, doing possible trade an attractive option. France ‘represents a market of 63 million consumers ‘ and is besides the ‘5th prima exporter of goods ‘ ( Invest In France Agency, 2007 ) doing possible investing from a UK concern appealing.

Table 1: Economic statistics by state

State

GDP, 2008 est.

( 1000000s of US dollars )

( Worldbank )

GDP alteration, 2008 est. ( % )

( CIA.gov )

Inflation, 2008 est.

Ease of Doing Business

Global Competiveness

China

4,326,187

9

5.9 %

83/181

30/134

Soviet union

1,607,816

5.6

14.1 %

120/181

51/134

Poland

526,966

5

4.2 %

76/181

53/134

France

2,853,062

0.3

2.8 %

31/181

16/134

( GlobalEDGEa„?,2009 ) , ( Worldbank, 2009 ) and ( CIA, 2009 )

Infrastructure

State

Evaluated Grading ( 1-4 )

China

2

France

1

Soviet union

4

Poland

3

Infrastructure will play an of import function in on the determination to export or straight put in a Country. Depending on a states transit substructure it may be more practical and cost effectual to export or straight invest, for case, if a state has extremely developed transit links across the state direct investing may be more suited as administering the merchandise will come easy.

Below are the assorted conveyance inside informations associating to four signifiers of transportation, air, route and train giving an idication of the methods used within each state.

( CIA, 2009 ) -Although, these are non comparative to population hence should non be used a transverse state comparing variable.

Russia has a reasonably developing substructure, with the railroad being the chief commercial draw beginning. Poland has a to a great extent route based substructure, although little in sum of Km compared to the other states due to size. France has extremely developed transit system, with transportation and inveigh seeing the most usage. China ‘s commercial conveyance is a mix of air, transportation and rail which contributes about 50 % of the states traffic ( Nations Encyclopaedia ) .

Good Communication is needed as concern demands changeless and effectual contact with providers, distributers and clients. Internet has become built-in to this, the figures below show internet users per 100:

( World Bank )

By and large all of our chosen states have developed communicating substructure. France had the most internet users, this would let our concern to make a larger sum of clients in that state. Poland ‘s has been accelerated and finished in 2003, France has a extremely developed communicating system with fibre optics in urban countries. Russia has seen some important alterations, with installing of digital lines in urban countries, needed for the market economic system. Finally, China has an of all time spread outing planetary substructure, particularly for the private sector ( Nations Encyclopaedia ) .

Executive Summary:

State

Political & A ; Legal

Cultural

Economic

Infrastructure

Total*

China

3

1

2

2

8

France

2

3

4

1

10

Soviet union

4

2

3

4

13

Poland

1

4

1

3

9

*The lower mark indicates higher desirableness.

From a legal and political standing Poland ranks extremely as its portion of the EU and we would therefore benefit from free trade understandings, its political construction is strong and its democracy and corruptness ( D & A ; C ) rank fared good globally. Secondly is France which for similar grounds would be favorable and its likened to the UK in many respects. With the best tonss on the D & A ; C rank of the selected states. The logical thinking for China non fairing peculiarly good in this regard could be attributed to its communist system of authorities, and the extremely graded corruptness evaluation. Lastly Russia ‘s system of authorities has struggled to retrieve from the incredibly corrupt Soviet brotherhood, in making so the balance of power there is laughably one sided, for these grounds and the fact that Russia has little in the manner of helping foreign investing makes it least desirable.

China was chosen as the best tantrum for cultural attraction as it is more multi cultural exposed to trade names hence may be easier to as they may be more adopting in the sense of a new merchandise in their market, along with this secondly its argued that Russia is 2nd as even though Poland and France are in forepart of its development economically culturally Russia seems more attractive to incorporate into as they are cognizant for demand of international trade and integrating and are progressively accepting this within their civilization whereas Poland and France have strong traditions desiring to maintain their strong cultural individualities, back uping local trade names and merchandises. Therefore Supporting the Countries attractive rating refering establishing this merchandise.

From looking at the economic certificates of the 4 states researched we can now speak about the attraction of each one in footings of possible concern. Overall Poland has been rated top as by non merely holding a truly cardinal location giving investors “ easy entree to 250 million consumers ” it has been described, by the Boston Consulting Group as “ going the fabricating hub of Europe ” ( Polska, 2008 ) . China ‘s attractive growing rate makes it an appealing market to spread out into ; this is why I have rated it 2nd in the overall attraction of the state. However Ernst & A ; Young have said that Poland could be a great alternate to China or India in footings of investing ( Polska, 2008 ) therefore reenforcing the logical thinking behind Poland ‘s evaluation. Russia has big untapped potency which could be capitalised on but this attribute entirely does non do it every bit attractive as the other two states. From the research France fared worse merely due to the fact of its similarities economically to the UK and therefore non making much existent chance in footings of investing or international concern.

Infrastructure across all of the states are really similar with engineering and transit invariably bettering within each. France has been placed first chiefly due its similarity with the UK, Russia has the most communicable up to make chiefly in footings of communicating entree and transit quality and links. Poland and China are similar in footings of steadily progressing both their communicating engineerings, and reasonably solid transit substructure.

Recommendations:

After our executive drumhead foreign direct investing in Poland seems to be the most attractive chance due to its low ranking, and our prioritisation towards economic and legal/political factors, whilst its somewhat higher ranking in other factors suggest growing will be possible. In footings of exporting our merchandise we feel that China would be the most comfortable as, although its political/legal rank was hapless, by exporting you avoid the major hazards in that sense and its fairing was positive with consideration to the other factors. Sing the other two states we feel that exporting to France would be suited, as similarities with the UK would intend that some additions should be made. Russia, nevertheless, poses excessively much of a hazard across all of our considered factors as bad tonss indicate jobs could easy originate.

Word Count: 2173