“ Male and Female Criminals are Portrayed Differently by the Media. Discuss ”
The thesis addresses ways in which male and female felons are portrayed in the media and the extent to which these representations have been linked to societal and cultural outlooks of work forces and adult females throughout history. Three cardinal instance surveies examine incompatibilities in the media’s portraiture of felons who have worked together in a twosome, and how these incompatibilities can be explained in visible radiation of societal and cultural tendencies. The deductions of these portraitures on condemnable justness policy and pattern are discussed, and recommendations for policy reform are put frontward. The thesis concludes that work forces and adult females who commit serious offenses with their spouses or hubbies are less likely to be treated laxly in the condemnable justness system and by the media.
We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!
The relationship between the media and the condemnable justness system has a long and celebrated history. The media has offered a agency of mediation between public sentiment and the condemnable justness system ; a vehicle through which societal and cultural tendencies and their impact on how the public perceive the intervention of felons can be seen. Over the last decennary, since the development of more sophisticated manners of planetary communicating, the presence of the media is progressively ineluctable. Online intelligence, wireless, and telecasting are a day-to-day portion of most people’s lives, and it is through these agencies that public apprehension of felons and their behavior is chiefly portrayed. The intervention of male and female felons has frequently tended to be different. This is due to the different societal and cultural outlooks that society has of work forces and adult females. This thesis seeks to analyze the differences in the media coverage of major instances and how they have differed between the genders of the people involved.
Within the context of differential intervention of gender in the media portraiture of gender the thesis will critically measure the deductions of this organic structure of research for condemnable justness policy and pattern, paying peculiar attending to issues of diverseness and anti-discriminatory pattern. The research worker will analyze how policy has sought to turn to the differential intervention of male and female felons, and to what extent farther policy reform might be needed. Media word pictures will be compared to what is known in criminological research about the world of gender differences in the types and causes of offenses.
The current research recognises that there has traditionally been a dearth of research that examines the intervention of felons by gender. This deficiency of research was noted by Grabe et Al ( 2004: 4 ) , in their publication that specified that ‘most research has focused on the portraitures of adult females in their most outstanding function in offense narratives, as victims of crime.’ The current research seeks to develop old research in this country by comparing the intervention of twosomes in the media to the intervention of a male and female coupling who are non a twosome. This will be done through the usage of three instance surveies of serious offenses.
Research for this thesis is secondary, and focuses on intelligence and amusement media, utilizing articles selected from on-line resources. Newspapers and magazines are analysed and relevant offense play are discussed. The major beginnings used for the literature reappraisal are books on media and condemnable research, and journal articles on the reading of the media by the sing pubic will besides be referred to. The literature reappraisal examines statistics taken from authorities web pages, and these are discussed in the analysis subdivision in the context of criminological theory. The instance surveies for the undertaking were chosen for their relevancy to the subject and the handiness of secondary stuff for research intents. Two instance surveies of violent offenses were selected, and one serious offense of misrepresentation was chosen as a comparative instance. The instance surveies are discussed alongside the literature reappraisal in the analysis subdivision.Chapter One:Literature Review
Condemnable justness policy and pattern
Condemnable justness policy seeks to make a just and merely judicial system in which felons are treated every bit, and non depending on differences in gender. The British Crime Survey ( 2003 ) states that work forces commit more offense than adult females. In all work forces consist merely under 95 % of the population detention. From between 1997 to 2003 the figure of adult females in detention increased from twelvemonth to twelvemonth. However, from 2004 the figure of adult females in detention has stabilised and in 2006 and 2007 the figure has decreased really somewhat ( Government Equalities Office, 2008 ) . Whereas the figure of work forces in detention has tended to increase twelvemonth on twelvemonth over clip. Most wrongdoers in the Criminal Justice System are given non-custodial sentences – the figures province that 97 % of all adult females wrongdoers and 92 % of all work forces wrongdoers are given non-custodial sentences. The nature of this sentence varies from individual to individual and between genders. Whereas adult females wrongdoers who receive a non-custodial sentence are more likely to be fined, work forces wrongdoers having a non-custodial sentence ( three quarters compared to two tierces ) are less likely to be fined. A farther contrast can be found in the fact that a greater figure of work forces wrongdoers having non tutelary sentences receive community orders compared to adult females. ( Government Equalities Office, 2008 ) . Condemnable justness policy has late been criticised for non taking into history the impact of tutelary sentences on adult females who have kids. Such sentences besides have deductions for societal services who are frequently put under excess strain to suit and care for kids whose parents are in gaol. Minister for Women Harriet Harman visited HMP Holloway, the UK’s largest all adult female prison, in spring earlier this twelvemonth and said the followers:
“When adult females are sent to prison, it’s non merely them who are punished, but their kids excessively. And many of these adult females need aid with intoxicant or drug jobs. That’s why the usage of community sentences is frequently a better solution for non-violent adult females wrongdoers. We have recognised that we can non keep the position quo and the Government is making of import work in this country. We are taking a different attack to the manner we treat female captives. ” ( Government Equalities Office, 2008 )
There is an obvious difference in the world of offense rates and the public perceptual experiences of offense rates and types of offenses committed. For illustration in the British Crime Survey over tierce of respondents ( 38 % ) believed the national offense rate to hold risen ‘a lot’ , and a farther 35 per cent believed it had risen ‘a little’ in the two old ages prior to interview. Whereas the entire figure of offenses reported to the BCS dingle by 17 % since 1999, 53 per centum of people still thought at that place had been an addition in the degree of offense in their local country. Furthermore, 43 per cent of those respondents who read tabloid newspapers thought that the national offense rate ( Mayhew, 1998: 127 ) had increased a batch, compared to 26 per cent of circular readers. In the context of this relationship between offense and newspaper readership, statistics show that adult females are a batch more disquieted about violent offense than work forces. In the BCS a one-fourth of adult females said they were really disquieted about being raped or physically attacked, and one-fifth ( 19 % ) really disquieted about being mugged. ( Mayhew, 1998:137 ) . Surveies have besides shown that interpersonal offenses committed by adult females are systematically over-reported compared to official statistics ( Naylor, 2001 ; Schlessinger, Tumber, & A ; Murdock, 1991 ) . Naylor ( 2001 ) besides found that interpersonal offenses committed by adult females were “more in demand of explanation” than other narratives because they radically challenged traditional constructs of adult females ( Grabe et al, 2004: 7 ) . Sara Sun Beale argues that commercial force per unit areas determine the content of the intelligence media and how it treats offense and force. Beale suggests that the resulting coverage has contributed to reshaping public sentiment, and finally, reshaping condemnable justness policy:
“The intelligence media are non mirrors, merely reflecting events in society. Rather, media content is shaped by economic and selling considerations that often override traditional journalistic standards for newsworthiness.” ( Beale, 2006: 397 )
The Government white paper of July 2003,Justice for Allprovinces that the purpose of the Criminal Justice System ( CJS ) is to present justness for all, “by convicting and penalizing the guilty and assisting them to halt offending, while protecting the innocent.” CJS aims to observe offense and convey it to justice, while transporting out the orders of tribunal, such as all right collection, and oversing community and tutelary penalty. The cardinal ends of the CJS are as follows:
- “To improve the effectivity and efficiency of the CJS in conveying offenses to justness ;
- To increase public assurance in the equity and effectivity of the CJS ;
- To increase victim satisfaction with the constabulary, and victim and witness satisfaction with the CJS ;
- To systematically roll up, analyse and usage good quality ethnicity informations to place and turn to race disproportionality in the CJS ; and
- To increase the recovery of condemnable assets by retrieving ?250m of assets acquired through offense by 2009-10” .
Within this model impressions of equality and anti-discriminatory guidelines are systematically being addresseed. Equality is a hard impression to implement because it is frequently merely noticeable through studies of inequlaity or unjust intervention – which come to visible radiation after the event. The strategic aim to ‘increase public assurance in the equity of the CJS’ has been a long-held aspiration of the CJS, but is an country of policy that is systematically worked towards instead than obtained. This is because societal and cultural factors are invariably determining the ways in which the populace perceive the CJS, so that the public’s relationship with the CJS is dynamic and mutable. The CJS has in topographic point a Strategic Plan for the following few old ages that proposes how the bureaus of the CJS in England and Wales will incorporate their attacks to supply a justness system that is:
- “effective in conveying offenses to justness, particularly serious offenses ;
- Engages the populace and inspires assurance ;
- Puts the demands of victims at its bosom ; and has
- Simple and efficient processes” ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www.cjsonline.gov.uk/the_cjs/aims_and_objectives/index.html )
If impressions of equality and an attack that does non below the belt distinguish between work forces and adult females is to be obtained so the CJS needs to beef up public sentiment through illustration. If work forces and adult females are treated every bit in the tribunals so the media has less stuff to utilize as propaganda.
Existing research shows that the type of offense type and the motive for perpetrating offense are important in finding how work forces and adult females felons are portrayed. Petty offenses committed by adult females are more frequently overlooked, while adult females who have committed violent offenses are more harshly punished and publically demonized in order to function as an illustration to adult females about the hazards associated with male force ( Chesney-Lind, 1999: 133-134 ) . Birch ( 1994 ) suggests that this tendency is grounds that the condemnable justness system’s intervention of adult females is such that it enforces stereotyped female sex functions that perpetuate patriarchates, while Weimann and Fishman ( 1988 ) suggest that the print media were more indulgent in their intervention of female felons because they ‘present female offenses as a consequence of circumstantial factors beyond single control, including being the pawns of male felons ( see besides Steffensmeier, 1983 ) .’ ( Cited from Grabe et Al, 2004: 6 ) . Condemnable Justice Policy has undergone considerable alteration over the last 10 old ages to seek and travel off from distinction in lenience between work forces and adult females, their types of offense, and between ‘couples crimes’ . For illustration, the standardization of policy execution coupled with recent acknowledgment of the force per unit area that punitory policies have had on the prison population has sought to readdress the thought of making a necessary balance between effectual sentencing and preventing offense rates from increasing, while besides detering the sensationalising of violent offenses in the media. The thought of judicial discretion exercising an ‘unfair’ sum of influence over a criminal’s sentencing has besides been an issue that has been addressed over the last 10 old ages. As highlighted by Grimshaw ( 2004: 2 ) these alterations have included compulsory minimal sentences, such as ‘life imprisonment for a 2nd serious offense, seven old ages for a 3rd drug trafficking offense, and three old ages for a 3rd domestic burglary.’
Representation of Criminals in the Media
The motives and causes of offenses are now more widely understood and discussed in the media. For illustration, some of the more serious domestic force offenses are now considered to be a batch more complex, affecting variables such as the effects of systematic maltreatment over clip and even hormonal alterations. The media now has an even greater grade of engagement in tribunal proceedings, so that the content of instances and their treatment can be facilitated in the public sphere. With the development of digital media, this component of public treatment has all of a sudden changed from local chitchat to planetary treatment. Unfortunately, every bit good as advancing right information and scene records directly, the openness of information act has frequently lead to misinformation being given and wrong public sentiments encouraged.
Over the last two decennaries at that place has been an addition in recorded offense, and an addition in the sum of media coverage of reported offense ( Biressi, 2001 ) , and besides of unreported offense. Biressi suggests that sensing rates have been falling, and the Criminal Justice System has alternatively been trusting to a great extent on more terrible punishments. This is portion due to a deficiency of available support, but besides due to the defects of condemnable justness policy. The media has besides been reflecting the increasing accent on the position of victims of offense, along with community responses. This has exacerbated other tendencies in media coverage of offense, such as distinction between male and female felons.
Through deceit the media can reenforce wrong attitudes amongst the general populace. For illustration, due to the accent that the media has placed upon juvenile offense and its addition and impact on local countries, the 1998 British Crime Survey found that merely 16 % of respondents realized that most ‘known’ wrongdoers are grownups, non juveniles ( Mattheson and Mirlees-Black ) . Over two-thirds believed that immature people were going progressively involved in offense between 1995 and 1997. Yet official statistics show that the figure of known juvenile wrongdoers remained changeless or fell during this period. ( Mattheson and Mirlees-Black ) . In relation to gender – while most people ( 68 % ) knew that juvenile offense was committed preponderantly by males, about a 3rd idea it was committed every bit by females.
In concurrence with this tendency it appears that the media has for the last 10 old ages progressively sought to stand for the force of adult females, in conformity with similar tendencies in popular civilization ( eg: the work of Susan Faludi ) . In world, adult females have merely contributed from 10 – 15 % of all homicides over the last 10 old ages, with estimations that this figure is falling, by every bit much as 25 % ( Holmlund, 1994. Cited by Chesney-Lind in Ferrell and Websdale, 1999: 115 ) . This suggests that people are reassigning impressions of equality onto their perceptual experiences of offense rates, doing them to falsify existent figures.
The altering importance that the media has assumed in academic survey has give rise to a figure of new countries of survey into media and its effects. It is now good documented that detecting certain types of scenarios on-screen can further certain behaviors in kids and grownups. Most pertinent to this thesis is the impression that the media can straight impact the ways in which people socialise and the respect they have for others. McGuire ( 1986 ) highlighted his chief countries of involvement to be “ ( a ) the consequence of media force on aggressive behaviour, ( B ) the impact of media images on the societal building of world, ( degree Celsius ) the effects of media prejudice on stereotyping, ( vitamin D ) the effects of titillating and sexual stuff on attitudes and obnoxious behaviours, and ( vitamin E ) how media forms affect cognitive activity and style.” ( Cited in Perse, 2001: 1-2 ) . Whereas McQuail ( 1994 ) emphasises “ ( a ) cognition addition and distribution throughout society, ( B ) diffusion of inventions, ( degree Celsius ) socialisation to social norms, and ( vitamin D ) establishment and cultural versions and changes” ( in Perse, 2001: 2 ) . Indeed, by puting greater accent on more serious offenses such as homocide, the intelligence media are said to falsify public perceptual experiences of the earnestness of other, less terrible and unrelated offenses ( Gebotys, 1988 ) . Within this extended model of coverage the media has the freedom to differ its intervention of male and female felons, harmonizing to public tendencies and anxiousnesss, political alteration, and harmonizing to how it shapes gender difference that has occurred over clip. It is understood that work forces and adult females have frequently been stereotyped into specific functions throughout history. Whereas work forces are frequently characterized as being more violent than their female opposite numbers, adult females are portrayed as being delicate and frail. When adult females feature in mediated offenses they are frequently over-represented as victims of offense ( Chermak, 1995 ; Surette, 1998. In Grabe et Al, 2004 ) , and in instances where work forces and adult females are twosomes it is frequently emphasised that the adult female was ‘ed astray’ by the adult male. Several major surveies into the representation of male and female felons have shown that telecasting intelligence ( Entman, 1992 ; Gilliam & A ; Iyengar, 2000 ; Grabe, 1999 ; Grabe, Zhou, & A ; Barnett, 2001 ; Kilgard & A ; Craft, 1995 ; Whitney, Fritzler, Jones, Mazzarella, & A ; Rakow, 1989 ) and newspapers ( Davis, 1952 ; Naylor, 2001 ; Roshier, 1973 ; Smith, 1984 ) have a higher representation of male criminalism and victimization of females ( Grabe et al, 2004 ) . Furthermore, work forces are most frequently seen as the adventuresome innovators while adult females do non presume functions of leading ( ‘Women Criminals’ , 2007 ) .
The media’s intervention of felons harmonizing to gender difference is per se related to the history of specific topographic points, landscapes and states. For illustration, Arizona one time had a solid repute as portion of the “ Wild West ” , which associated it with stagecoach robberies and barroom battles. Whereas most narratives of Arizona’s disruptive history involve work forces:
“Men were typically cast both as the cryptic bad cats who robbed the phase, and as the baronial sheriffs who struggled to continue the jurisprudence. Womans, when they were remembered at all, were most often cast as virtuous innovator adult females, fighting to retain muliebrity in the unsmooth Arizona frontier, or as motiveless barroom adult females with few delivering characteristics.” ( ‘Women Criminals’ , 2007 )
It appears that the ways in which the media treated Arizonan adult females felons greatly depended upon societal and cultural perceptual experiences of adult females as being pure, gentle, and guiltless. This created a procedure of common support whereby adult females broke the mold of stereotyped passiveness, merely to be treated favorably by the media and so laxly in the tribunals. For illustration, the ill-famed Pearl Hart who held up a stagecoach in the late 1890’s with a male confederate received merely five old ages for her offense, in contrast to the 30 old ages that her confederate received. It took a 2nd jury to make up one’s mind upon this sentence, the first holding acquitted Hart wholly – due to her holding ‘won them over’ with her feminine appeals. However, non all the imperativeness were so sort to Hart. Whereas some newspapers were sympathetic to her larceny because she had no money after her hubby left, and needed the money for her ill female parent, other newspapers criticised the jury who acquitted Pearl, claiming that “the finding of fact would make the repute of Arizona considerable sum of hurt, as it will corroborate many Eastern people in the thought that the people of Arizona have a sneaking understanding for offense when it assumes new and picturesque phases.” (Ibid ) .It surely seems that Pearl Hart gained ill fame because she was a adult female who committed offenses normally associated with work forces, and while demoing resiliency and strength of character Hart was of a bantam and feminine visual aspect that ‘confused’ people in the condemnable justness system as to how to handle her. Furthermore, it was the incongruousness of Hart’s actions with the modern-day Victorian impressions of adult females that shocked and surprised people – adult females were far less likely to perpetrate a offense in 1890’s Arizona due to the high outlooks that society had of them.
In contrast, the societal outlooks of adult females in modern-day British society are far wider ranging and far less dictatorial in their application. Contemporary portraitures of adult females felons by the media appears to hold an undertone of surprise at flooring or dishonest behavior, whereas this kind of behavior in work forces is represented as being less flooring. This is because we live in a civilization that somehow still expects adult females to move with more decorousness or decency than their male opposite numbers – despite being a society that promotes equal chances and non-differential intervention between genders. This attack by the media on foregrounding the daze at certain types of behavior by adult females can be seen on a lesser, yet still important graduated table, in the media representation of adult females famous persons, who if caught rummy and disorderly on camera receive a far more negative media response than do work forces of the same age and business. These ways of stand foring adult females in the media come as a reaction to what Biressi footings a ‘network of dominant discourses, which aligns adult females with exposure and victimhood.’ ( 2001: 136 ) . The behavior of adult females felons is perceived to be an utmost manner of withstanding these discourses and therefore actively reshapes them into something new. Biressi recognises that a sensed being of violent offense among the working category from work forces onto adult females, has been ‘the inevitable corollary of category formation ( instead than of sedimented gender dealingss ) ’ ( 2001: 136 ) – and is profoundly engrained within mundane historical consciousness.
Annette Ballinger besides postulates that the differential intervention of adult females and work forces felons has a historical footing in the ways in which adult females felons have been intervention in Britain over clip. Ballinger ( 2000 ) examined the executing of adult females in 20th century Britain, proposing that ‘if the reluctance to put to death adult females for infanticide persists into the modern epoch, by contrast adult females guilty of slaying an grownup are more likely to be hanged than are work forces who have committed a similar offense. The ground is that such adult females demonstrate an unsuitableness for the ‘motherly ‘ , caring image that work forces demanded.’ ( Cochrane and Melville, 2004: 85 ) . As Ballinger is quoted as stating:
The mere fact that a adult female has broken the jurisprudence ensures that she will be regarded as person who has failed to carry through gender function outlooks, and if this is overlaid by a refusal to show her committedness to conventional female functions in her personal life, particularly in the countries around gender, reputability, domesticity and maternity, she can anticipate to happen herself at the having terminal of the full force of…’judicial misogynism ‘ [ i.e. hatred of adult females ] [ Women liquidators ] fell victim to cultural misogynism in general and judicial misogynism in peculiar. ( 2000, p. 3. In Cochrane and Melville, 2004: 85 )
Britain’s modern-day media representation of offense emphasises the thought that much more force occurs within interior metropolis countries, and much force occurs ‘underground’ – go forthing the media small or no grounds to discourse. However, when a state of affairs comes to light through misguided individuality – for illustration, the instance of Rhys Jones – so the media focal point on the lives and histories of the young person involved. For illustration, a recent article inTelegraphabout Sean Mercer, Jones’ slayer, has insinuated that his violent run is familial, detailing how a relation of his was hanged for slaying last century. The article describes Mercer’s neglecting to turn himself in, and slightingly provinces that he ‘continued to tittup around his council estate with other pack members for around six months afterwards as investigators gathered adequate grounds to bear down him.’ ( Simpson, 2008 ) . The media, particularly newspapers, repeatedly reinforce the negative facets of societal want, and therefore promote procedures of generalization and support in the heads of readers that these qualities are true and universally applicable. In many instances of violent offense, the media will be given to ‘side’ with the populace, in resistance to gang-related offense – whether or non the pack member has yet to be proved guilty. The portraiture of peculiar persons in the media can hold a major impact upon their quality of life, and it is one of the aims of the CJS to seek and protect both victims and culprits within the judicial system, so that they are non made vulnerable in the outside universe. A good illustration of how work forces are ‘branded’ with constructed individualities due to their association with a peculiar offense is work forces who are on the sex wrongdoers register. Due to increasing public force per unit area non to allow sex wrongdoers remain anon. , individualities have late begun to be made public. However, this has led to greater struggles between sex wrongdoers who have been seeking to do new lives for themselves and the attitudes of people in the country that they move to. The media has the power to bring forth peculiarly detrimental and bad promotion for the victims involved.
Biressi ( 2001 ) orientates her publication around the premiss that the media contributes towards bring forthing “certain cognitions and peculiar narratives about offense, patroling, disciplinarity and societal control” and that the academic survey of the historical and political discourses of offense can assist us to better understand ways in which impressions of “lawlessness, of citizenship and single duty have been articulated and perpetuated, underpinning the rhetorical division between the moral topic and its others.” These constructs, argues Biressi, have become particularly pertinent in visible radiation of Rawlings’ claim ( 1999 ) that public perceptual experience of condemnable justness policy is returning to ‘eighteenth-century values’ – by puting accent on community responses to offense, on private policing and on the disincentive of felons through imprisonment.
An overruling tendency in media coverage is one of the ‘Bonnie and Clyde’ consequence ( Grabe et al, 2004 ) whereby male and female twosomes receive a much more barbarous representation in the media than a male and female who are non a twosome. Grabe et al suggest that the gallantry hypothesis features conspicuously in media portraitures of work forces and adult females, whereby adult females receive more indulgent intervention in the condemnable justness system, but that this hypothesis was less outstanding in the intervention of work forces and adult females felons who had been a twosome. The “chivalry hypothesis” suggests that because adult females are viewed as weak and irrational that jurisprudence hatchet mans and the condemnable justness system are more indulgent in their intervention of adult females ( Anderson, 1976 ; Pollock, 1950 ) . Grabe et al province that ‘in recent decennaries, some surveies have offered partial support for the gallantry hypothesis ( Bernstein et al. , 1979 ; Moulds, 1980 ) , while others have challenged the thought ( Farrington & A ; Morris, 1983 ; Edwards, 1984 ; Eaton, 1986 ) . Research has besides shown that gallantry is non every bit showed to all female felons ( Chesney-Lind, 1999 ; Crew, 1991 ; Feinman, 1980 ; Kruttschnitt, 1982 ; Bernstein, Cardascia, & A ; Ross, 1982 ; Morris, 1987 ; Rafter, 1990 ) , particularly when female felons are paired in a twosome with a male felon.
Crime in Television Programming
Rhonda Estep and Patrick McDonald ( 1984 ) conducted an empirical survey about primetime offense on Television from 1976 to 1983 that highlighted the difference between media representation of criminalism and the world of criminalism. They suggested that felons were portrayed as more violent than they really were, with an over-representation of white, middle-aged and middle-class felons. Estep and MacDonald besides observed that over clip prime-time telecasting has devoted at least one-third of its clip to offense, with slaying consisting 26 per centum of prime-time
offenses, robbery 19 per centum and assault 11 per centum.
Danielle Soulliere states that offense and jurisprudence enforcement plans have been extremely popular in telecasting scheduling for the past four decennaries and have included such plans as “The Avengers, Mod Squad, Kojak, Baretta, Hawaii Five-O, The Rockford Files, Dragnet, Starsky and Hutch, Colombo, Hill Street Blues, Magnum, P.I. , Cagney and Lacy, Simon and Simon, Miami Vice, T.J. Hooker, In the Heat of the Night, Murder She Wrote, L.A. Law, The Commish, NYPD Blue, Walker: Texas Ranger, The X-Files, Homicide, Law and Order, The Practice, Nash Bridges, JAG,andJudging Amy.”( 2003: 12 ) . Barak ( 1994 ) focused on three major subjects in the media portraiture of work forces and adult females felons in the 20Thursdaycentury. He highlighted these as being the development of the marauder felon as a media icon, the word picture of sexually violent offenses against adult females, and the representations of high-profile police-citizen brushs. Barak suggests that these representations of high spot the “ entropy ” and “ impersonal ” nature of condemnable action and progressively emphasizes the “ violent ” responses by felons, both male and female. However, Perse ( 2001 ) argues that popular telecasting plans and films are non the most violent, and that most people do n’t happen media force appealing. However, this is non to ignore the popularity of force amongst certain demographic groups—such as mark audiences of people age 18 to 49. These groups are exploited through media advertisement, and Perse provinces that “young people are the largest market for media violence” mentioning research by Hamilton that “nearly 75 % of the heavy viewing audiences of force programming [ e.g. , fictional offense, real-life constabulary plans, and action-adventure movies ] are concentrated in three of the demographic groups, males 18–34, females 18–34 ( 21 % of heavy viewing audiences ) , and males 35–49 ( 19 % ) ” . ( In Perse, 2001: 200 ) .
Case Study One: Rose and Fred West
The continuance and badness of the West slayings in Gloucester proved to be a instance that shocked the media and the constabulary force involved, every bit good as the populace who learned the inside informations second-hand. Fred West has become a high-profile felon, non least because of his self-destruction in 1994, go forthing his married woman, Rose West, to take to stay in gaol for a life-sentence for her engagement in the slayings and colza of over 20 victims. There has surely been a greater sense of enigma environing Rose’s engagement in the instance – 1 that has been exacerbated by the media over the old ages since the test in the early 1990’s. Part of the ground that the twosome have been treated so otherwise by the tribunals and by the media is due to Fred’s confessions- that cast him in a different visible radiation. On the one manus doing hello to be portrayed as a slayer who confessed to killing, and besides as a slayer who boasted about his violent deaths. West, frequently described as ‘perverted’ and a ‘sado’ by the media had utmost sexual gustatory sensations and sexually abused adult females and kids. It is thought that West suffered head hurts in an accident in his teens severe plenty to change his personality. Old ages after Fred West’s decease accounts for his motivations and methods of killing are still being offered. For illustration, in 2002 a Scots forensic psychologist Dr. Keith Ashcroft put forward his sentiment that Fred West ‘s insatiate sex demands were in fact caused by the terrible caput hurt after the bike accident that occurred when he was a adolescent. In contrast there has been less focal point on the causative factors of Rose West’s engagement in the instances. It is known that Rose West’s female parent endured electric daze intervention while she was pregnant with Rose and that as a kid Rose was seen as ‘slow’ and grew up to be a promiscuous adolescent who finally got raped by an older adult male. In an article in theNews of the Worldin 2008 West is criticised for her engagement with a pen buddy through composing letters in prison. The tone of the article is barbarous and ridiculing, naming West an ‘absurd fiend’ and ‘vile killer’ ( Thurlbeck, 2008 ) . It seems that without Fred West still alive to take his portion of the public choler and incrimination, that Rose West has become what she footings a ‘scapegoat’ for Fred West’s actions.
Much contention surrounds the West instances because of what happened to the grounds after West’s decease in 1994. As West did non go forth a will the sensitive stuff did non travel to the British Government but alternatively was sold to the highest bidder, that happened to be ‘Creative Consortium’ – a movie production company. The stuff included interviews with West about his slayings and elaborate descriptions of his actions over the twenty-year period. The resulting productions caused daze and indignation, and were said to falsify and hype inaccurate allegations. For illustration, after watching a 3-part Channel 5 docudrama on Fred & A ; Rose West in early October of 2001, Gloucestershire ‘s main constable Tim Brain told the BBC that he thought it was “ sickening and undue. ” ( Bardsley, 2008 ) . This evident loop-hole exposed by the media was the topic of a measure introduced in March 2002 by Gloucester MP Parmjit Dhanda that prohibited the sale of condemnable grounds. Dhanda is quoted as stating to the House of Commons that: the programme content “showed Fred West depicting his offenses in great item. It showed images of victims, faded in and out against images of their skeletal remains. It shows Rose West discasing in forepart of the camera and in bed with her clients.” (Ibid ) .The Broadcasting Standards Commission ( BSC ) in March of 2002 reported that the 3-part series “ was a serious, unsensationalised attempt to understand the Wests ‘ condemnable behavior” and defended the usage of the stuff. The BSC seemingly told BBC News that “ the thought of the series was to put the violent deaths in context to derive an penetration into why they took topographic point and how Fred West evolved from a sex wrongdoer to a consecutive slayer. ” ( Bardsley, 2008 )
An article inTime Magazinein 1995 depicted West to be in great contrast to traditional impressions of muliebrity and beauty. For illustration, the article states that ‘last hebdomad the sensational seven-week test in Winchester, England, mercifully ended, and a female parent of eight entered the condemnable annals as Britain ‘s most fecund female consecutive killer’ ( Gibson, 1995 ) . The fact that West was a female parent to so many kids is mentioned foremost, and in the same sentence as the fact that she is the UK’s most ‘prolific killer.’ This placing of the information serves to make a more lurid disclosure to the reader. West is besides derogatorily presented as gazing ‘behind oversize glasses’ as the justice pronounced 10 life sentences, and is devoid of emotion or characteristics that distinguish her as either female or male. It appears that Fred West’s character is portrayed in the media as holding been systematically cheerful, instead than him externally portraying himself as any sort of male parent figure. For illustration inTime MagazineFred West is described as ‘friendly Fred’ while Rose is ‘motherly Rose, ’ despite Fred West holding more kids than Rose from a old relationship.
The issues that have arisen from the portraiture of the West instance in relation to policy and pattern are varied and still really much relevant. Condemnable jurisprudence is meant to assume that each person is guiltless until proven guilty, while the degree of cogent evidence that is required is that grounds should set up the person’s guilt ‘beyond sensible doubt’ ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www.direct.gov.uk/en/CrimeJusticeAndTheLaw/Thejudicialsystem/DG_4003097 ) . However, Rose West was imprisoned for her portion in the slayings despite there being a dearth of grounds, beyond circumstantial, to convict her. A great trade of guess has occurred since the decease of Fred West into the grade to which the weaknesss of the Gloucester Police have been sought to be compensated for by taking a tougher line in the indictment of Rose West. For illustration, Rose West has put frontward legion entreaties all of which have been refused. It appears that the Justice System has to a certain grade taken the side of the populace against Rose West because of her ill-defined engagement in such a horrific and extended figure of slaying instances – which went undiscovered for so many old ages, and for so many old ages afterwards. Furthermore, there were apparent weaknesss of the Gloucester Police – even when one miss named Caroline reported that she had been abused by the West’s and the instance went to test. It seems that the tribunal were swayed by the West’s protestation of their artlessness, and merely fined them.
The Moors slayings of the 1960ss by Ian Brady and accomplice Myra Hindley have been said to put a ‘benchmark for evil’ in British society ( Chaundy, 2008 ) . As in the West instances the slayings besides involved sexual assault and utmost anguish of really immature and guiltless victims of both sexes, non merely adult females.
The intervention of Ian Brady in the newspapers is non so evidently barbarous. This is possibly due to the oversight of clip since Brady’s offenses. For illustration in an article written for the BBC intelligence in 2008 Brady is presented as a instead sorrowful individual who has tried to reshape some kind of being for himself, through composing books in Brail, and wishing to donate a kidney, but that these attempts were rejected ‘without reason’ by the Home Office ( Chaundy, 2008 ) . Brady’s instance has been so high profile that he has become an illustration – one that governments do non wish to advance or to pull media attending to. Brady speaks of this phenomenon in letters that were partially published in 2008 in theDaily Mail.
The portraiture of Hindley in the media has been different to Brady. Hindley died in 2002, aged 60, and since her decease she has featured abundantly in the media, non least for her failed entreaties to be moved to an unfastened prison. Newspapers took a peculiar involvement in the attempts of high-profile figures, such as Spike Milligan who wrote to the authorities on her behalf in 1997 requesting that she moved to an unfastened prison. Milligan’s missive was portion of a file of 600 gathered paperss associating to Hindley and which have been transferred to the National Archives in Kew, west London, from the Home Office. Milligan’s attempts were featured in theTelegraphin June ( 2008 ) in which it is stated that “He told the Tory Home Secretary: “ Myra Hindley was merely an confederate to the slayings of the kids and whereas the parents of the kids intelligibly would merely settle for Myra Hindley ‘s hanging, I think you should demo Christian compassion with a determination of Myra Hindley being transferred to an unfastened prison. ” As in the instance of Rose West there is still a sense of impending justness in the manner in which the media portrays the character – it is as if no punishment can do for the hideousness and badness of the offenses with which she was associated. TheTelegraphwas besides acute to indicate out that “correspondence from other high profile figures naming for clemency for Hindley are contained in the documents, including Lord Longford.” Again, it appears that these statements are presented in order to be combative. The response of the condemnable justness system to these entreaties was to travel Hindley to a average security unit in 1998, the twelvemonth after Milligan ended his run.
Over the old ages since the Moors slayings were committed there has been extended media coverage of how the twosome met and how they came to perpetrating their offenses. It appears that the media have sought to contextualise the couple’s crimes – more so than if they had committed the offenses on their ain. This is in no manner suggestive of any signifier of leniancy – instead the contextualsiation seems to seek to explicate the motivations more clearly and therefore show a more terrible image of premeditated and inhuman behavior.
The Kidnap of Shannon Matthews
Earlier in 2008 the disappearing of schoolgirl Shannon Matthews led to a multi-million lb hunt by constabulary across the UK. When it was revealed that the girl’s female parent, Karen Matthews, had staged her ain daughter’s abduction with a friend of the household, Michael Donovan, the intelligence sparked a media craze that attacked Karen Matthews, her life style, and her societal category, handling her far worse than her confederate, Michael Donovan.
A peculiarly pertinent subject of the media, particularly over the last five old ages, has been the word picture of dwellers of socially deprived countries of Britain and the ‘problems‘ that they represent in society. These jobs include economic troubles, unemployment, – and as more late highlighted by the instances of Shannon Matthews and ‘Baby P’ – jobs with child maltreatment. Yet there is a readily distinguishable difference in the manner that Matthews was treated in comparing to Donovan who planned the kidnap with Karen, and who forcibly hid the miss on his premises.The Daily Mailcalled Karen Matthews ‘lazy’ and ‘sex-mad’ – a symbol of ‘broken Britain’ ( 5ThursdayDecember, 2008 ) . It appears that Matthews fits easy fits into the mold of outlook that the media have created around benefit Dendranthema grandifloruoms and adult females who have several kids by different male parents. For illustration, in most articles about the instance Matthews is about ever described as holding seven kids by five male parents, whereas the household fortunes of Donovan are seldom if at all mentioned. Since the bustle of newspaper studies into the ‘morality’ and life style of Ms Matthews, the media has hooked onto the latest authorities attempts to reconstruct the economic system by look intoing the lives of households who live on benefits and who have non been working. In consequence, the media have precipitated a signifier of moral terror about socially deprived countries in Britain – a concern that has been constructing over the last few decennaries due to contention about the handiness of the public assistance province and people’s maltreatment of the public assistance system.
The media picked up on a remark by the detective – who was in charge of the instance – who called Ms Matthews ‘pure evil’ for her portion in seeking to organize the abduction of her kid. Although possibly more due to simpleness than her really showing a danger to society, this term became affixed to Matthews. Smith ( 2008 ) states that this detective’s remark created a ‘grandstanding for the media’ that ‘struck a chord.’ The paper was since ‘bombarded’ with exposure of Matthews that ‘show her as slumped, corpulence and looking more like a adult female in her 50s than her existent age of 33.’ In consequence, the ‘ greatest ‘danger’ of Matthews was that she represented what people were afraid Britain was going.
Although intelligence articles have since recognised that the remark about Matthews being ‘evil’ was inappropriate for a member of the constabulary to state, and that the term is merely applicable in utmost fortunes frequently affecting unmitigated force or horror, the negative intensions of the remark have remained. What this shows is that Shannon Matthews’ female parent has been highlighted as an illustration of a ‘problem’ that has easy been coming to a caput for a long clip. ‘Working-class households – particularly immature parents – are frequently depicted as ‘chavs’ by the media, and in on-line environments – eg: the web site called ‘Chav Towns’ – that explicitly ‘warns’ people about the presence of ‘chavs’ in towns across the UK. In the instance of Matthews it appears that non merely have socially deprived groups of people been made an illustration of, but there is a clearly different attack by the media towards the representation of the adult male in the instance, Donovan. The instance as a whole has been promoted as an illustration of the type of effects that might originate from turning up in socially deprived countries, where good relationships between parents and kids are non fostered.
The media attending on Matthews was far more aggressive and grim than it was for her male confederate. There is no grounds that the gallantry hypothesis was applicable to Karen Matthews’ intervention in the media. Rather, the fact that she wasnonin a relationship with her confederate was portrayed as a negative, whereby she was accused of pull stringsing him because he had a low IQ. Karen Matthews’ negative promotion is in portion due to the fact that Matthews assumed a more outstanding function in the instance, looking up to the media and intelligence squads across the state in her entreaties to happen her girl. Julian Goose, QC, for the prosecution, told Leeds Crown Court that Karen Matthews, 33, and her confederate Michael Donovan, 40 ‘maintained a colossal prevarication in a command to claim the wages money offered by the imperativeness, which at its tallness reached ?50,000.’ (Timess,Nov, 2008 ) . Mr Goose besides stated that “ The prosecution say that Karen Matthews is a consummate and convincing prevaricator [ .. ] while Karen Matthews was misdirecting the constabulary and the populace, Michael Donovan kept Shannon hidden.’ Surpirsingly small has been discussed in the documents about Donovan’s function. For illustration, the Times merely states that Donovan ‘was watching the hunt and the promotion as it was covered in newspapers which he bought from clip to clip until he was finally arrested’ and planned to ‘discover’ Shannon in order to claim the wages.
To seek and forestall imbalanced intervention of male and female felons at that place needs to be specific condemnable justness policy amendments, some of which have already begun to turn to issues of inequality and anti-discrimination. Grimshaw ( 2004 ) notes that ‘while the UK-USA theoretical account is preoccupied with signifiers of segregation and ever-longer periods of ‘prisonisation’ , the European theoretical account is restrained and ‘mild’ , using criterions of rights that are designed to uphold criterions of decency and humanity.’ It is possibly this more ‘mild’ attack to policy that encourages the sensationalizing of violent offense by media and in public responses: the thought that people can ‘get away’ with serious and violent offenses and be ‘looked after’ in prison on revenue enhancement payer’s money. In the intelligence points discussed there is surely a sense that no justness available in the system is ‘enough’ for the earnestness of the couples’ offenses. In partial response to this national attitude a distinguishable deficiency of lenience has been shown to felons such as Hindley and Brady, who were non allowed to travel to Open Prisons, despite over 40 old ages holding elapsed since their offenses were committed. However, the justness system has had to counterbalance for the high profile nature of these instances by seeking to maintain media attending to a lower limit. This has meant that twosomes such as Hidley and Brady have been treated otherwise to other felons who have committed serious offenses – who are frequently released early or who receive different sentencing.
To seek and advance better criterions of equality between the intervention of male and female felons at that place needs to be more chances for adult females to work in senior places within the justness system. In the constabulary force excessively senior places need to be made more accessible to adult females. By advancing equal chances and equal gender representation at such a high degree in both the constabulary force and the judicial system the domain of influence of these determinations will lend towards keeping a better equilibrium in the intervention of felons – both in the justness system and in the media. The CJS besides needs to work towards the publicity of anti-oppressive pattern in justness bureaus and schools. As recommended by The Home Affairs Committee ( 2008 ) this can include educational programmes for all kids to advance diverseness, inclusion and anti-discriminatory behavior, and developing programmes that aim to construct up trust and regard between justness bureaus and immature people.
Sara Beale’s article is utile in this analysis because it addresses the typical cultural differences of American people as a major lending factor to the continuity of punitory condemnable justness policy – and might function as a theoretical account for the survey of the influences of English public attitudes on British condemnable justness policy. Beale emphasises the traditional American cultural values as being individuality, autonomy, and personal duty – which is “consistent with an apprehension of offense as an single pick instead than the consequence of socioeconomic conditions.” Thus, Beale states that decision that it is the general belief of American society that offense should be punished more harshly in order to discourage it, “while at the same clip stressing personal duty instead than the inordinate leniency of broad plans such as welfare.” The intervention of female felons in the media does non look to advance non-custodial sentences, even in instances where adult females have kids. This is linked to Beale’s apprehension of cultural outlook – the thought that “you do the offense you do the time” doctrine. Beale argues that this is an American ideal – yet with English civilization holding been Americanised in many ways, and the planetary interaction between states via digital communications, such ideals are no longer easy defined as belonging to a peculiar state.
The instance surveies have shown the fluctuation of engagement that the media assumes in condemnable instances. They besides show that female felons are more likely to be negatively represented in the media than their male confederates, despite holding equal or less involvement in the same offenses. Furthermore, there is grounds that the ‘Bonnie and Clyde’ consequence remains a strong influence on the ways in which ‘couples’ offenses are portrayed in the media and ways in which these offenses are addressed in the condemnable justness system. This consequence can be seen in the manner that the coupling of consecutive slayers Hindley and Brady, and the Occidents have become ill-famed, whereas adult females with male confederates, such as Karen Matthews are made more of an single illustration of.
The female felon who is a female parent receives far worse coverage by the media, and seemingly is non conceded to by the condemnable justness system. As suggested by Grabe et Al ( 2004 ) research has shown that: “Whether female felons are portrayed as bad, huffy, wicked or weak, they are cast outside the kingdom of normality. This casting is peculiarly true for adult females who commit force in the context of confidant, caring relationships ( eg: Ballinger, 1996 ; Berrington & A ; Honkatukia, 2002 ; Hasian & A ; Flores, 2000 ; Morris & A ; Wilczynski, 1993 ) . ( Grabe et al, 2004: 7 ) . Whereas Naylor ( 2001 ) puts forward that intelligence manufacturers treat violent female criminalism as the ‘most pervert, anxiety-producing, and transgressive of all offense scenarios.’ ( Ibid ) . The instance of Rosemary West is a good illustration of how the motherly function of adult females is focussed on in the intervention of adult females felons. Whereas Fred West raped his ain girls and killed them he received less imperativeness about being a bad male parent than Rose West did for being a hapless female parent. The findings of the instance surveies are consistent with findings of feminist criminologists that have demonstrated that it is the type of offense instead than the earnestness of the offense that determines how adult females are treated in the condemnable justness system. For illustration Grabe et Al ( 2004 ) province that ‘female felons who commit unfeminine Acts of the Apostless ( e.g. , behave violently or victimise kids ) are treated much more badly than their opposite numbers whose illegal activity conforms to the criterions of muliebrity ( e.g. , stealing nutrient for one’s household ) .’ This attack is surely applicable to Rise West who failed to carry through traditional impressions of maternity and muliebrity by slaying her ain girl. Furthermore, in portraying the colza of the West’s girl many newspaper study emphasise the fact that Rose West held her down while her male parent raped her – deducing both the grade of Rose West’s engagement in and cognition of the offenses, but besides her failure as a female parent to protect and foster her kid.
Many documents provide ocular stuff in their portraitures of the West’s. Thorson ( 1995 ) has demonstrated the importance of ocular stuff in helping information callback and found that readers are more likely to read articles that are accompanied by ocular shows ( in Grabe et Al, 2004 ) . In the portraiture of the consecutive slayer twosomes there are frequently many images of the couple’s lives together. The coverage of both couple’s offenses has been criticised over the last 10 and twenty old ages for its holding been sensationalised – as evidenced by the contention over the taped stuff that appeared in a docudrama. As stated by Grabe et Al ( 2004: 5 ) “a big headline size and arrangement of an article as the lead narrative signals the prominence of a narrative and is frequently associated with sensationalism.” It surely seems that the sum of promotion received for the offenses received did negatively impact the ways in which the twosomes were treated by the condemnable justness system. In other instances where offense has been suspected by a twosome but non proved at that place have been similar tendencies. For illustration, the intervention of the parents of Madeleine McCann has been notoriously criticised since the girl’s disappearing last twelvemonth – to the point where the media were portraying them as guilty of slaying and its privacy ; something that was wholly ‘suggested’ by circumstantial grounds.
The findings of the literature reappraisal are consistent with other researches into programme content of crime-related programmes – such as American offense detective seriess, includingColumboandLaw and Order( eg: Grabe et Al ( 2004 ) . These researches suggest that in fictional offense play the media portrays a comparatively accurate word picture of felons and condemnable behavior. It appears that in existent life the intervention of felons is frequently sensationalised and become so high profile that the justness system seek to understate the media attending on the topics ( as evidenced by the instance of Ian Brady ) . The ways in which the populace position justness has been explained by several major theoretical attacks. For illustration, the Marxist attack to understanding penalty suggests that it works in the involvement of some groups more than others and focal points on how penalty is imposed on and directed against peculiar subdivisions of the on the job category. Marixst approaches highlight the relationship between the labor market and different manners of penalty, with adult females frequently seen to be encouraged to work at certain times – known as portion of a ‘reserve ground forces of labor ‘ ( Cochrane and Melville, 2003: 45 ) . Hudson ( 2003 ) suggests that the favouring of certain groups should take to a ‘recognition of the significance of gender for the sociology of penalty ‘ . ( in Cochrane and Melville, 2004: 45 ) . This has caused several feminist attacks to turn to the penal intervention of adult females, although Cochrane and Melville province, “such work has tended to stay ‘on the borders of poenology and criminology’.” (Ibid ) .Cochrane and Melville argue that if the Marxist statement is non flawed so there should be a discernable nexus between rates of imprisonment of adult females and the labour market state of affairs of adult females. There is limited research in this country, which does so underscore adult females ‘s of import parts to the capitalist system in relation to their socialization and educating functions. Research by Eaton ( 1986 ) on the imprisonment of adult females suggests that holding a household to look after does promote lenience in penalty – this is in conformity with the Marxist thought of the household as reproducing a disciplined and basically submissive work force. However, as pointed out by Cochrane and Melville in the context of the comparative punishments given to adult females and work forces, the Marxist attack does non really address why adult females wrongdoers are more frequently portrayed as mad instead than bad, and punished consequently ( Cochrane and Melville, 2004 ) .
To put the research undertaking in context – while proposing that the media does hold an of import portion to play in promoting disciplinary condemnable justness policy, there are other factors that contribute towards this tendency. For illustration, the ways in which societal and cultural universes interact with the intelligence media is a critical difference between the influences of condemnable justness policy on the lives of felons in the States in comparing to Europe. Beale suggests that the American penal system is harsher, and the ways in which the intelligence media interacts with the public reinforces support for punitory policy ( Beale, 2006 ) .
Part of the ground that the media actively seeks to handle work forces and adult females felons otherwise is that it inspires typical and predictable reactions and rifts in the reading populace. The media thrives on making tenseness and struggle and will travel to great lengths to concentrate on a negative remark or reaction if there is possible to work it to increase gross revenues. There exists a broad organic structure of research that proves the relationship between media content and societal tendencies. For illustration the impression that violent media content contributes to violence in society is supported by anecdotal studies of felons ‘ media usage and the media studies of “copycat” offenses ( Perse, 2001 ) . Whereas violent scenes in movies have been linked to “imitation crimes” ( Surette, 1998. In Perse, 2001: 199 ) .
The research collected for this thesis has provided support for the presence of the ‘chivalry hypothesis’ in the ways in which adult females are treated in the condemnable justness system. However, when adult females criminals commit offenses with male spouses the gallantry hypothesis is improbable to be a causative factor in the manner in which adult females felons are treated in the condemnable justness system. This tendency can be partially explained by the societal and cultural outlooks that Western society topographic points upon adult females. In a society that promotes equal chances, particularly in the workplace, adult females are still expected to carry through fussing functions, and autumn short in people’s appraisals if they fail to carry through impressions of muliebrity that are embedded in our historical consciousness. In the intervention of male felons in the media who committed offenses as portion of a twosome the thesis found support for the thought that there is far less grounds to propose that work forces are criticised by the media and subjugated to more terrible intervention by the condemnable justness system in visible radiation of sensed failures to carry through traditional male functions – such as being a male parent figure. The significance of the Chivalry hypothesis for Criminal Justice Policy has been that more frequently rough sentences have been passed on adult females. This is suggested by the intervention of the three female felons examined in the instance surveies. Policy reform in these countries is already afoot. However, policy demands to be tighter in order to forestall the justness system being swayed by public sentiment or by the sum of media attending on a instance in order for better criterions of equality and anti-discrimination to be achieved.
Research into the media and its effects on the sing public suggested that while a 3rd of programme content involved the representation of offense the response of offense was non significantly positive. In other words, people tended to accept that offense is in the media instead than bask watching it, and had by no agencies become desensitised to offense through its presence in the media. The sensationalism that followed the finds of the offenses by Hindley and Brady, and by the Wests surely contributed to the manner in which their instances were handled in the condemnable justness system, and the ways in which the instances have been represented in the media since.
Although it is a common construct that the media have contributed towards promoting and sensationalising force and making a violent civilization it is necessary to retrieve that the media is merely portion of a more general cultural motion off from spiritual conformance and big centrali