Oedipus Tyrannus is deemed as Sophocles’s magnum musical composition and is doubtless the most celebrated of all Grecian calamities. Aristotle went to the extent of naming it a perfect drama. It was foremost performed in around 425 b. c. . merely merely after a pestilence that had wreaked mayhem on Athens. Oedipus Tyrannus was set in Thebes. a metropolis which was besides confronting the same calamity. King Oedipus was informed by the Creon. the brother of Oedipus’s married woman. Jocasta that the metropolis will stay a sick person unless and until the killer of the old male monarch is convicted.

Oedipus promised to detect the killer’s individuality and to prosecute him. Ignorant of the fact that he himself was the liquidator. Oedipus unremittingly trailed the truth until he found his ain guiltiness and blinded himself so he might ne’er catch the sight of his male parent in the afterworld. A Freudian analysis of Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex ( the King ) would indicate out that Oedipus genuinely had an incestuous nature. This was exposed non merely by Oedipus’ matrimony to his ain female parent. by whom he had kids. but besides by his unreasonable penchant for his girls. Antigone and Ismene.

While the attending he showed to his girls was profound and braced with gender. he dismissed his boies as animals who are able to look after themselves. Although he was unconsciously attracted to his girls. he besides had this fright in his head that his girls would go outcast and will be unable to get married.

Freud thought that all the work forces since birth seaport non a natural repulsion to incest. but the contrary which is an natural sexual attractive force to the female parent. He says. “ [ The experiences of depth psychology ] have taught. . that the first sexual urges of the immature are on a regular basis of an incestuous nature” ( Totem and Taboo. p. 160 ) . He besides emphasized that each male anchorage open feelings towards their male parents. “But certainly I must fear my mother’s bed? ” ( Oedipus Tyrannus. line 576 ) When Oedipus throws this inquiry to his married woman Jocasta. he is wholly unmindful of the reconditeness of his words. The Messenger has merely informed him about the slaying of King Polybos of Corinth. Oedipus’ supposed male parent.

Now free in his head from the bullying of Apollo’s foretell that he would kill his male parent. Oedipus here desires to formalize with his married woman that. as his conjectural female parent ( the queen of Corinth ) is still populating. he must still look into that for fright that he sleep with her. as the prophet besides foretold. But his words touch a more primary issue: Why is the prognosis that he will kip with his female parent so dreadfully endangering and vile? Oedipus is really calmed and contented about the natural decease of his supposed male parent Polybos. as in his head this frees him from the concern that he will someday kill his male parent.

Freud had suggested an interesting account of the beginning of the tabu against incest and parent slaying. In the crude civilisation. people lived in groups dominated by the most powerful male. the male parent. who hold a sexual monopoly over the group. When each of his boies grew to an age where he would dispute the father’s domination in order to acquire a portion of the action. so to dispute. the male parents forced them to go forth the group. After so many boies had been so treated like this. they resolute to collaborate in order to take from power their male parent and acquire clasp of the females. their female parents. for themselves.

With their corporate strength. they killed the male parents. In civilised society. Freud observed. prohibition against such offenses go unexpressed. but this is non grounds that we no longer harbour such wants. The scruples of world which now appears as an familial mental force was acquired in connexion with the Oedipus composite. However. from Sophocles’ text. it would look that Oedipus does everything in his power to debar these two offenses.

Freud excessively examines the drama from this vantage point although. under the fresh construct of unconscious motive. moral disapprobation gives manner. Freud’s position added another dimension to old simplistic differences as to whether an action was freely willed. and therefore capable to moral injunction. or determined by destiny. Freudian intentionality implied that there were actions which. though non intended ( consciously ) . nevertheless were compulsive passages of interior latent wants ( Hamilton 1993. p. 209 ) .